Top-Ten Posts
- Facts Everyone Should Know about Desertion (20983)
- Fathers rights organizations in Winnipeg, Manitoba (2900)
- Verdict expected in Catherine Kieu Becker case (1868)
- Is the MGTOW phenomenon a good thing or not? (1776)
- O2 and Symantec recognize FR blog (1455)
- Second World War – Bombing of the German Cities (1442)
- Divorce causes escalating suicide rates (1271)
- Tom Ball’s last statement a message for all (1079)
- School Problems Then and Now — No improvement (1035)
- Sources of Indian rape statistics deplorable (990)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Top-Ten Posts – Today
- Anorexia Nervosa kills very rarely (1)
- Why men are paid more — gender wage gap issue persists (1)
- School Problems Then and Now — No improvement (1)
- The Intellectual Perversion of the VAWA Mafia (1)
- Violence, gang warfare – what has gone wrong… (1)
- Climate Crisis, Warming or the next Ice Age, Depopulation (1)
- Chick-fil-A founder shows mercy to vandals (1)
- Domestic-Violence equivalent of the Berlin Wall crumbling? (1)
- Violent women cause problems largely ignored (1)
- The Catalog of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics (1)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Site lock
Subscribing and logging-in: Disabled
Comment at or visit dads&things on FB
Recipient of the O2/Symantec Recognition Award
Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blogs are being slandered and censored.
Whether you are a fathers-rights activist, a pro-family activist or a skeptic of environmental alarmism, it is quite likely that your website or blog is being slandered and censored, too. It is being done on the sly. No one will tell you about it. If it happened, you will have been found guilty and were sentenced in the Star-Chamber court of a multinational corporation (by an obscure clerk, in an obscure office), and it is not likely that you will be able to appeal. Check the rating of your website or blog. I had asked O2 to review and explain their website rating policy in regard to Fathers for Life. They did not respond.-
Recent Posts
- Some selected COVID-19 Statistics
- FB censorship is capricious and illogical
- History of child- and youth-mortality rates
- The face of FB shadow banning
- Is this FB shadow banning?
- FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- FB censorship intrudes into family life
- Support, a euphemism for censorship
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt
- Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
Recent Comments
- Is this FB shadow banning? • dads&thingsdads&things on FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt • dads&thingsdads&things on Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
- Walter H. Schneider on Facebook locked me out
- Walter Schneider on Communism Second-wave feminism Social re-engineering
- Walter Schneider on Roman Warm Period : Timeline and Decline
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Men migrate, may pick bad destination
Tag Archives: Burning the environment to save it
Renewable energy neither practical nor viable
Last updated 2019 05 14, to add links to related articles. Where and whenever it is possible to connect to the grid, energy generation from renewable energy sources is quite likely not economical, compared to conventional sources of energy feeding into the transmission grid, but it can be and is an excellent source of tax revenue and more yet in secondary taxes. It cannot produce a good return on investment and requires subsidies to cover the losses it incurs. People are being frustrated by the relentless push for energy generation from renewable energy sources. It is becoming more and more apparent that energy generation from renewable source, for no … Continue reading
Burning the environment to save it
What a weird and wondrous story about saving the environment a detailed investigation of the conversion of the Drax power station to bio-mass fueling (mostly wood chips) would make. Who is behind that one and who profits the most, the owners, the accountants, the politicians or perhaps the media? Even Wikipedia must be considered to be part of the media. It cannot be trusted to tell the truth on environmental issues. It does not even mention that Drax is now being partially powered by wood chips imported from places such as the US and produced by mining vast tracts of land for trees (although Wikipedia’s main article on the Drax … Continue reading
Posted in Climate & Weather, Economy
Tagged Burning the environment to save it
Comments Off on Burning the environment to save it
You must be logged in to post a comment.