Site lock
Recipient of the O2/Symantec Recognition Award
Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blogs are being slandered and censored.
Whether you are a fathers-rights activist, a pro-family activist or a skeptic of environmental alarmism, it is quite likely that your website or blog is being slandered and censored, too. It is being done on the sly. No one will tell you about it. If it happened, you will have been found guilty and were sentenced in the Star-Chamber court of a multinational corporation (by an obscure clerk, in an obscure office), and it is not likely that you will be able to appeal. Check the rating of your website or blog. I had asked O2 to review and explain their website rating policy in regard to Fathers for Life. They did not respond.
Category Archives: Feminist Jurisprudence
Why suddenly outrage over touching by Sen. Biden ?
Updated 2019 04 09: to add comments on and links to information on VAWA. Why suddenly outrage over touching by Sen. Biden? No one should be eager to participate in the campaign of outrage, disdain, scorn and outright deprecation against touching by Sen. Joe Biden. The largely hysterical reactions against him in the aftermath of the #MeToo movement address nothing criminal, as far as anyone has determined, so far. It does not seem likely that anything worse than that will surface. The curious aspect of the media’s overreaction is that, if Sen. Joe Biden did anything that warrants the media feeding frenzy now, what is it that triggered it? Is … Continue reading
Posted in Books & Films, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Media Bias, Propaganda Exposed
Comments Off on Why suddenly outrage over touching by Sen. Biden ?
Equality of Outcomes destroys Freedom
Update 2018 09 20 Efforts to bring about equality of outcomes destroy freedom, as explained in this: “A society that puts equality—in the sense of equality of outcome—ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests.” —Milton and Rose Friedman, in Free to Choose: A Personal Statement Take the example of article 15 of The Constitution of India. It addresses the “Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.” Article … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Men's Issues
1 Comment
Family courts solve divorce applications backlog
Family Courts (they essentially give marching orders to Child Protective Services) – put in place during the 1960s to solve a growing divorce applications backlog – primarily target men. They also seriously hurt children. Family courts were to mitigate the divorce applications backlog in the regular court system (in the early 1960s, waiting periods for court hearings after divorce applications were three and more years – and rapidly growing longer). The growing divorce applications backlog was a consequence of the legalization of ‘no-fault’ divorce. In ‘no-fault’ divorce, the default position is nevertheless that the fault is placed on the shoulders of the men. All of that works exceedingly well, so … Continue reading
Feminist Conquest -Supremacism – in India vs Male Rights
Male rights to procreate (or not) are some of many rights being lost by Indian men in the context of the feminist conquest of India. Female supremacism thus becomes ever more firmly entrenched. Siddharthasankar Mukherjee explained the implications of that in a Facebook posting: The Abrogation of Male Procreation Rights By Siddharthasankar Mukherjee, 2018-06-01, Facebook Well. All rights are of women. Why not aggrieved men then avoid celebration of so-called Independence day when they are actually dependent on women’s will? Supreme Court says a woman has unimpeachable right whether she wants to have a baby or wants to abort a baby. Indirectly they are saying that a decision related to having or not … Continue reading
Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
Updated 2019 01 01: Minor syntax changes in first and last paragraphs The measure of capital offences is whatever we (that is: primarily social justice warriors—predominantly women) wish it to be. The same is true of the statute of limitations. Therefore, it is easy to determine that anything that happened in the past can—by today’s politically-correct standards—be deemed to have been an offence of the desired severity. Objective reality and the absolute truth therefore become immaterial, and all behaviours, past and present, can be judged to be and to have been politically incorrect by whatever is decided today’s subjective standards make them, loved or hated, even capital offences — if … Continue reading
Paul Schwennesen, separated father’s lament
Paul Schwennesen wrote a separated father’s lament that got published by the Huffington Post. The article at the shared link is good. It is anecdotal evidence of the consequences of a wife and mother walking out of her marriage. The father became devastated, was without a doubt fleeced by his ex who used the system to the hilt against him, by having him removed from his own home, and by having him arrested when he dared to say his good byes to his kids at the bus stop, when they went off to school. He was put in handcuffs, but apparently not into jail, until that got cleared up. A … Continue reading
Posted in Child Support, Child-Custody Awards, Civil Rights, Divorce, False Allegations, Feminist Jurisprudence, Men's Issues, Paternal Rights, Shared Parenting
Comments Off on Paul Schwennesen, separated father’s lament
Indian Family Court: Pay or be arrested
Concerning Indian Family Court (pay or be arrested and incarcerated), the situation described by Indian men’s rights activist Subu Subramaniam in the shared comment and being discussed in the discussion thread at the source is bad for men, but it needs to be put into perspective. Subu Subramaniam continues with his description of the case: High Court of Karnataka Daily Orders of the Case Number: MFA ____/20__ for the date of order __/__/2017 Honble Justice _____________________ __/___/2017 Order in MFA ____/20__ It is stated by the learned counsel for the appellant that, arrest warrant has been issued in the execution of the Decree of the Family Court. Learned counsel for … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights, Divorce, Feminist Jurisprudence, Population Control
Comments Off on Indian Family Court: Pay or be arrested
Indian men’s suicides reached epidemic proportions
Indian men’s suicides are escalating steadily and reached epidemic proportions, years ago already. In contrast, although Indian women are constantly being portrayed as victims of male oppression and in need of protection and promotion, the suicide rates and numbers of suicides by Indian women remain virtually unchanged, compared to what they were in 1995. Rather, the suicide rates and numbers of suicides by Indian women have seen a substantial decline since 2011. Please help to draw attention to the epidemic of Indian men’s suicides that takes the lives of close to 100,000 men each year in India. India’s men’s rights activists (MRAs) have much concern that Indian men’s suicides escalate. … Continue reading
Public violence against Indian men not the deadliest
“Indian Women Assault Men – Police Congratulate” used to happen a lot in India, does it still? It served well to put men in their place, deserved or not. Still, public violence against Indian men is not the deadliest. Men and women had equally long lives on average in India, not all that long ago. That was admirable, as that should be used as the standard for the desired outcome of the consequences of equal rights for the sexes. Nevertheless, the vilification of India’s men and the promoting of women’s rights and privileges led to India’s women now enjoying considerably longer lives than they did in 1960. In 1960, Indian women’s … Continue reading
Men’s suicides in India inequality-driven
Updates 2018 06 09 — Note: This update reflects that India’s NCRB censored itself after the initial version of this blog posting was published on June 17, 2017. Instances of the NCRB’s self-censorship are indicated by the notes in red font throughout the text of this blog posting.2021 04 15 — This update was made to alleviate FB censorship, to insert a response to Gavan O’Sullivan’s comment on anti-male discrimination in India, a response that FB did not let me post to Gavan O’Sullivan’s discussion thread. 2021 04 16 — To reflect another notification by FB that my comments to Gavan O’Sullivan violates FB’s community standards on spam. India experiences … Continue reading
English
বাংলা
简体中文
繁體中文
Dansk
Nederlands
Filipino
Français
Deutsch
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Norsk bokmål
Polski
Português
Русский
Español
Svenska
Українська
Tiếng Việt