Top-Ten Posts
- Facts Everyone Should Know about Desertion (20983)
- Fathers rights organizations in Winnipeg, Manitoba (2900)
- Verdict expected in Catherine Kieu Becker case (1868)
- Is the MGTOW phenomenon a good thing or not? (1776)
- O2 and Symantec recognize FR blog (1455)
- Second World War – Bombing of the German Cities (1442)
- Divorce causes escalating suicide rates (1271)
- Tom Ball’s last statement a message for all (1079)
- School Problems Then and Now — No improvement (1035)
- Sources of Indian rape statistics deplorable (990)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Top-Ten Posts – Today
- Anorexia Nervosa kills very rarely (1)
- Why men are paid more — gender wage gap issue persists (1)
- School Problems Then and Now — No improvement (1)
- Violence, gang warfare – what has gone wrong… (1)
- Climate Crisis, Warming or the next Ice Age, Depopulation (1)
- Chick-fil-A founder shows mercy to vandals (1)
- Domestic-Violence equivalent of the Berlin Wall crumbling? (1)
- Violent women cause problems largely ignored (1)
- Woman arrested for stabbing husband (1)
- Women’s violence (1)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Site lock
Subscribing and logging-in: Disabled
Comment at or visit dads&things on FB
Recipient of the O2/Symantec Recognition Award
Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blogs are being slandered and censored.
Whether you are a fathers-rights activist, a pro-family activist or a skeptic of environmental alarmism, it is quite likely that your website or blog is being slandered and censored, too. It is being done on the sly. No one will tell you about it. If it happened, you will have been found guilty and were sentenced in the Star-Chamber court of a multinational corporation (by an obscure clerk, in an obscure office), and it is not likely that you will be able to appeal. Check the rating of your website or blog. I had asked O2 to review and explain their website rating policy in regard to Fathers for Life. They did not respond.-
Recent Posts
- Some selected COVID-19 Statistics
- FB censorship is capricious and illogical
- History of child- and youth-mortality rates
- The face of FB shadow banning
- Is this FB shadow banning?
- FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- FB censorship intrudes into family life
- Support, a euphemism for censorship
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt
- Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
Recent Comments
- Is this FB shadow banning? • dads&thingsdads&things on FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt • dads&thingsdads&things on Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
- Walter H. Schneider on Facebook locked me out
- Walter Schneider on Communism Second-wave feminism Social re-engineering
- Walter Schneider on Roman Warm Period : Timeline and Decline
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Men migrate, may pick bad destination
Category Archives: Civil Rights
Support, a euphemism for censorship
Updates2021 04 11: to show screen shot of FB spam notification 2021 04 12: to describe the next stage of FB censorship Support, a euphemism for censorship — A “support message” is not a support message when FB sends it to its clients. That is when the support message is a notification that a comment a FB client had wanted to post in a FB discussion thread will not be displayed by FB. The other day I wanted to post a comment but found that it never made its appearance in the FB discussion thread it had been intended for. Today I received a Facebook “support message” that solved the … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights, Feminism, Men's Issues
Comments Off on Support, a euphemism for censorship
Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson, a review by Frank Zepezauer (first published in the Mar/Apr 2000 issue of The Liberator), presents information about gender roles that modern feminism opposes, censors, or derogates. Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson by Frank Zepezauer, resident philosopher Have you ever heard of the National Congress of Mothers? Until recently I didn’t know about them myself and I’ve spent a lot of time studying women’s organizations. It so happens that the NCM was actually the biggest women’s lobby in American history. Founded during the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, it had 190,000 members by 1920 and over one million by 1930. The National Organization for Women, … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights, Family, History
1 Comment
The 1966 Agenda of the National Organization of Women (NOW)
The 1966 Agenda of the National Organization of Women (NOW) was only the first of many such agendas and has undergone numerous changes and transitions since the first in the long series was published. During the 1990s, I downloaded the 1966 agenda of NOW, because I feared that at some time in the future the agenda wouldn’t be available at the NOW web site anymore, either because NOW will become defunct, or because NOW might find their 1966 agenda to become an embarrassment, or both. The 1966 Agenda is quoted here unabridged, except for the comments I provided after each of the portion of the quoted text of the 1966 … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights, Feminism, History
Comments Off on The 1966 Agenda of the National Organization of Women (NOW)
Freedom and Equality vs Rules and Power
Updated 2019 05 09 Freedom and equality vs rules and power — all are essential for symbiotic coexistence in a successful, thriving society. Many clamor for “freedom and equality” and forget that the price for that is “duties and obligations.” Fairness is a bit more difficult to achieve. There is little fairness in equality of outcomes. The latter is the enemy of and defeats the former. The concepts of fairness and equality of outcomes are incompatible. Still, a successful, thriving society uses the right tools to establish a good balance in the apparent conflict between freedom and equality vs rules and power, by allowing and promoting them to exist in … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights
Comments Off on Freedom and Equality vs Rules and Power
How many identity types must identity politics cater to?
How many identity types must identity politics cater to? The short answer to the question is, there are at least seven million different unique identity types that identity politics must address. The figure is that large or larger when catering to identity types is not just demanded in two or three developed nations but within the context of the global village. If it is difficult to imagine why there should be such large numbers of identity types, consider the example of a man who is a gay, Black, an illegal Chinese, Lutheran, elderly, transgendered person. (Caution: When contemplating such combinations of category attributes, it is entirely possible that, apparently, some of … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights
1 Comment
Identity politics clash with reality
Updated 2019 05 12 Identity politics clash with reality. They result in too many quotas and insufficient excellence. Lack of reward and punishment is fatal to an economy that is forced to conform to identity politics. An ideal, conservative, moral universe (let’s not quibble but assume there is such a thing) needs no identity politics. No one is favored, no one unfairly burdened, everyone has equal opportunities, equal rights, equal obligations and equal privileges. That’s it, that’s all, and it doesn’t get any simpler. People (except for some progressives) in a conservative moral universe will be free and generally happy. An ideal, radical-liberal, moral universe (again, let’s not quibble but assume that Utopia can be … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights
Comments Off on Identity politics clash with reality
Equality of Outcomes destroys Freedom
Equality of Outcomes destroys Freedom. “A society that puts equality—in the sense of equality of outcome—ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests.” —Milton and Rose Friedman, in Free to Choose: A Personal Statement Facebook’s design for the constraints it wants to place on freedom of expression, by means of its “community standards,” makes it impossible to accuse Facebook and the people who run and own it of failing “to promote their own interests” … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights
Comments Off on Equality of Outcomes destroys Freedom
Freedom of expression vs Identity politics and censorship
Individual rights and freedom of expression took thousands of years to evolve. They made civilization great and held the promise to make it greater yet. Facebook is out to dismantle much of the progress in attaining universal free speech. Instead, Facebook promotes speech codes and censorship. Those are to freedom of expression what shackles and prisons are to freedom of movement. That is not progress, it is regress. Human nature strives to achieve improvement, perfection, with the limits to that only being set by human imagination, and that is limited only by human ingenuity. No flights of unlimited human imagination are achievable by using anyone’s “community standards” that constrain freedom … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights
2 Comments
Speech codes limit the right to free speech
Update 2018 12 31: Rewritten to incorporate two sections, “Comparing Facebook to other utility-access services,” and “FB must not have the right to censor” Speech codes limit the right to free speech and to freedom of expression. Who gave Facebook the right to act as judge, jury and executioner, to be a lawmaker, to issue the rules, to enforce, monitor compliance, judge adherence, hand down punishment for non-compliance and administer punishment accordingly? Why did Facebook assume the powers of legislator, police, judge, jury, and jailer? I’m no longer confused. I became confused when I heard the word ‘service’ used by these agencies: Revenue Canada Service, Canada Postal Service, Telephone Service, Civil … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights
2 Comments
Facebook : legislator, police, judge, jury, and jailer
Facebook : legislator, police, judge, jury, and jailer – Facebook becomes a contender in the realm of the business of the law. That is not a good state of affairs. Facebook assumes the roles of police, judge, jury and executioner, even that of the legislators (legislators means lawmakers, our legally elected, legal representatives, who “hammer out the laws” that our employees – the police, the judges, and our jailers and executioners of our system of jurisprudence – install, monitor adherence to, judge the quality of performance on and administer, are put in charge of performing the duties required to ensure that punishment ordered by judges is administered properly). Facebook … Continue reading
Posted in Censorship, Civil Rights
1 Comment