Updated 2019 05 12
Identity politics clash with reality. They result in too many quotas and insufficient excellence. Lack of reward and punishment is fatal to an economy that is forced to conform to identity politics.
An ideal, conservative, moral universe (let’s not quibble but assume there is such a thing) needs no identity politics. No one is favored, no one unfairly burdened, everyone has equal opportunities, equal rights, equal obligations and equal privileges. That’s it, that’s all, and it doesn’t get any simpler. People (except for some progressives) in a conservative moral universe will be free and generally happy.
An ideal, radical-liberal, moral universe (again, let’s not quibble but assume that Utopia can be created) needs a (at least theoretically) large but unknown numbers of identities. Everyone is favored, everyone unfairly burdened, no one has equal opportunities, equal rights, equal obligations and equal privileges, but everyone is by law entitled to receive the benefits that his unique set of characteristics (shared with other members of his minuscule minority) entitle him to receive. All others are bound by law to do what it takes to provide what the members of every minority are entitled to.
That is a very confusing complexity, but it doesn’t get any simpler. People (mostly progressives) will to varying degrees be slaves and generally unhappy, because of their demand that every individual must be differentiated from others with a different set of characteristics and is entitled to special treatment. That brings on the fatal flaw of identity politics. Quotas inevitably result in under-performance of an economy, an unavoidable outcome of rewarding low performance of individuals and not seeking and rewarding individuals who perform excellently.
Some may think that is absurd, but that is only because truth is stranger than fiction. Reality dictates that we cannot achieve the ideal moral universe of the radical-liberal (pure, ideal, Marxist) variety. Nevertheless, that is why identity politics can’t work out. We cannot create a political structure or system that caters to a very large number of identities. How large that number will grow depends on what people want and on which of those things or characteristics they want they will be able to give legal recognition to. The number has practical limits set by what people and society can handle. A lot of assumptions must be made, and there is an unknown number of unknowns that make that very difficult, to say the least, but there it is, the fact that those who are entitled to want everything can neither be satisfied nor ever be happy.
That is one reason why identity politics clash with reality. The next article in the series answers the question: How many identities must identity politics cater to?
Back to index for this article series
- Equality of Outcomes destroys Freedom
- Speed test : Censorship is free speech
- ‘Science 2.0’ weighs in — Alessandro Strumia’s reputation
- Seven Genders – Why not more?
- Gender Under Re-Construction – Social Justice Warriors at Work
- Second-wave Feminism — Ideological Foundation