Top-Ten Posts
- Facts Everyone Should Know about Desertion (20983)
- Fathers rights organizations in Winnipeg, Manitoba (2900)
- Verdict expected in Catherine Kieu Becker case (1869)
- Is the MGTOW phenomenon a good thing or not? (1776)
- O2 and Symantec recognize FR blog (1455)
- Second World War – Bombing of the German Cities (1445)
- Divorce causes escalating suicide rates (1271)
- Tom Ball’s last statement a message for all (1079)
- School Problems Then and Now — No improvement (1041)
- Sources of Indian rape statistics deplorable (991)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Top-Ten Posts – Today
- Wife kills husband in booze row (2)
- Thoughts on Eco-Feminism (1)
- The systematic deconstruction of the family and nation(s) (1)
- New Brazilian Law : Parental Alienation is Child Abuse (1)
- Freezing children in Norway — Africans help out (1)
- Population control holocaust? Family courts participate (1)
- Support, a euphemism for censorship (1)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Site lock
Subscribing and logging-in: Disabled
Comment at or visit dads&things on FB
Recipient of the O2/Symantec Recognition Award
Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blogs are being slandered and censored.
Whether you are a fathers-rights activist, a pro-family activist or a skeptic of environmental alarmism, it is quite likely that your website or blog is being slandered and censored, too. It is being done on the sly. No one will tell you about it. If it happened, you will have been found guilty and were sentenced in the Star-Chamber court of a multinational corporation (by an obscure clerk, in an obscure office), and it is not likely that you will be able to appeal. Check the rating of your website or blog. I had asked O2 to review and explain their website rating policy in regard to Fathers for Life. They did not respond.-
Recent Posts
- Some selected COVID-19 Statistics
- FB censorship is capricious and illogical
- History of child- and youth-mortality rates
- The face of FB shadow banning
- Is this FB shadow banning?
- FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- FB censorship intrudes into family life
- Support, a euphemism for censorship
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt
- Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
Recent Comments
- Is this FB shadow banning? • dads&thingsdads&things on FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt • dads&thingsdads&things on Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
- Walter H. Schneider on Facebook locked me out
- Walter Schneider on Communism Second-wave feminism Social re-engineering
- Walter Schneider on Roman Warm Period : Timeline and Decline
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Men migrate, may pick bad destination
Monthly Archives: October 2018
Consequences of Divorce : Long-lasting effects on children
Updated 2019 05 15 As to Consequences of Divorce : Long-lasting effects on children, it is an unsubstantiated myth that children are resilient, that their parents’ separation and divorce will not affect them, even be good for them. Yet, as Stephen Baskerville wrote, the common ‘wisdom’ is that, …”No good can come from forcing people to remain in loveless marriages, even in the misguided belief that somehow it is better for the children,” runs an editorial in the Daily Herald of Provo, Utah, opposing a mild reform bill recently introduced. “Is it really good for children to be raised in a home by two parents who don’t love each other … Continue reading
Posted in Divorce
2 Comments
‘Science 2.0’ weighs in — Alessandro Strumia’s reputation
Last updated 2018 10 11 ‘Science 2.0’ weighs in on the destruction of Alessandro Strumia’s character, motivations, reputation and career prospects. »Strumia’s slides contain a collection of half-baked claims, coming from his analysis of InSpire data from citations and authorship of articles in theoretical physics. I consider his talk offensive on many levels. It starts by casting the woman discrimination issue in scientific academia as a test of hypothesis of whether the “man-woman” symmetry is explicitly broken (i.e. there is no symmetry) or spontaneously broken (by a difference of treatment) – something that could even raise a smile in a geeky physicist; but the fun ends there. He uses all … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights, Education, Men and Women Work
2 Comments