Top-Ten Posts
- Facts Everyone Should Know about Desertion (20983)
- Fathers rights organizations in Winnipeg, Manitoba (2900)
- Verdict expected in Catherine Kieu Becker case (1869)
- Is the MGTOW phenomenon a good thing or not? (1776)
- O2 and Symantec recognize FR blog (1455)
- Second World War – Bombing of the German Cities (1445)
- Divorce causes escalating suicide rates (1271)
- Tom Ball’s last statement a message for all (1079)
- School Problems Then and Now — No improvement (1041)
- Sources of Indian rape statistics deplorable (991)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Top-Ten Posts – Today
- Wife kills husband in booze row (2)
- Thoughts on Eco-Feminism (1)
- The systematic deconstruction of the family and nation(s) (1)
- New Brazilian Law : Parental Alienation is Child Abuse (1)
- Freezing children in Norway — Africans help out (1)
- Population control holocaust? Family courts participate (1)
- Support, a euphemism for censorship (1)
- Popular posts by Top 10 plugin
Site lock
Subscribing and logging-in: Disabled
Comment at or visit dads&things on FB
Recipient of the O2/Symantec Recognition Award
Yes, the website for Fathers for Life and its affiliated blogs are being slandered and censored.
Whether you are a fathers-rights activist, a pro-family activist or a skeptic of environmental alarmism, it is quite likely that your website or blog is being slandered and censored, too. It is being done on the sly. No one will tell you about it. If it happened, you will have been found guilty and were sentenced in the Star-Chamber court of a multinational corporation (by an obscure clerk, in an obscure office), and it is not likely that you will be able to appeal. Check the rating of your website or blog. I had asked O2 to review and explain their website rating policy in regard to Fathers for Life. They did not respond.-
Recent Posts
- Some selected COVID-19 Statistics
- FB censorship is capricious and illogical
- History of child- and youth-mortality rates
- The face of FB shadow banning
- Is this FB shadow banning?
- FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- FB censorship intrudes into family life
- Support, a euphemism for censorship
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt
- Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
Recent Comments
- Is this FB shadow banning? • dads&thingsdads&things on FB censorship reaches absurd levels
- Recovering All the Past with Amaury de Riencourt • dads&thingsdads&things on Recovering the American Past with Brian C. Robertson
- Walter H. Schneider on Facebook locked me out
- Walter Schneider on Communism Second-wave feminism Social re-engineering
- Walter Schneider on Roman Warm Period : Timeline and Decline
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter Schneider on Little Ice Age — Climate Trend Milestone?
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Capital offences proliferate under political correctness
- Walter on Men migrate, may pick bad destination
Monthly Archives: June 2018
dads&things – search results relating to keywords
dads&things – Search results differ, depending on the source of the data. Take the example of dads&things and what Alexa tells about search results in relation to respective frequencies of searches on specific keywords. @ Alexa tells me this: FreeFind, the search engine installed and accessible on each page of dads&things tells me: Keyword list for searches 2018 06 21 to 2018 06 28 Keyword Frequency incest 5 Silverstein reports that sexual fantasies about or desires for their fathers are common childhood 5 Down syndrome 4 Eco-feminism 2 “down syndrome” 1 “Let me review some of the collateral damage from a promiscuous lifestyle of so-called ‘free’ love.” 1 #childrenshortage 1 … Continue reading
Posted in Web Statistics
Comments Off on dads&things – search results relating to keywords
Internet censorship affects all, censors and censored
Providers of search engines and of social media have the power to influence, controls and steers what all of the people in the world must think and talk about in their everyday activities. Such power vastly exceeds that of Big Brother described by George Orwell in ‘1984’. Continue reading
Family courts solve divorce applications backlog
Family Courts (they essentially give marching orders to Child Protective Services) – put in place during the 1960s to solve a growing divorce applications backlog – primarily target men. They also seriously hurt children. Family courts were to mitigate the divorce applications backlog in the regular court system (in the early 1960s, waiting periods for court hearings after divorce applications were three and more years – and rapidly growing longer). The growing divorce applications backlog was a consequence of the legalization of ‘no-fault’ divorce. In ‘no-fault’ divorce, the default position is nevertheless that the fault is placed on the shoulders of the men. All of that works exceedingly well, so … Continue reading
Survivor hyperbole – increasingly popular survivor fad
Survivor hyperbole – Survivors of [insert victimhood category] – is an ever more popular survivor fad. What is it with the growing popularity of the fad that drives ever more people to assert that they are survivors of something or other? If merely being alive is classified as survival, does that make a mundane life heroic? An old saw goes, “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger,” and another one, “Adversity makes people tough,” or “When the going gets tough, the tough get going.” Nothing is perfect. Not even things that kill do kill everyone, but what about things that are not obviously, extremely rarely or not even logically fatal? Is someone … Continue reading
Feminist Conquest -Supremacism – in India vs Male Rights
Male rights to procreate (or not) are some of many rights being lost by Indian men in the context of the feminist conquest of India. Female supremacism thus becomes ever more firmly entrenched. Siddharthasankar Mukherjee explained the implications of that in a Facebook posting: The Abrogation of Male Procreation Rights By Siddharthasankar Mukherjee, 2018-06-01, Facebook Well. All rights are of women. Why not aggrieved men then avoid celebration of so-called Independence day when they are actually dependent on women’s will? Supreme Court says a woman has unimpeachable right whether she wants to have a baby or wants to abort a baby. Indirectly they are saying that a decision related to having or not … Continue reading