Social engineers increasingly promote that the future is female. Still, at the founding of the UN, the natural family was declared to be the basic building block of nations and worthy of protection and nurturance. Legally, that declaration is still in force. The question is whether the declaration is still worth something or not even the paper it is written on.
Nevertheless, today, with radical feminists and extremist gender activists having taken control of the UN through non-governmental organizations (NGOs), an all-out war is being waged against the natural family. Check out The Gender Agenda and find out about the history and the state of the war against the family.
You may wonder why anyone should worry about a feminist- or female-controlled future world, where the future is female. If so, then you don’t think much of the rights of human males.
You may see nothing wrong with a world populated only by females. If that is the case, you obviously think that one half of humanity is not worthy of being kept around, and perhaps you shouldn’t be looking at this page.
Whatever the case may be, perhaps you should look up a short story, Consider Her Ways, by John Wyndham (first published by Michael Joseph, 1961), that describes what such a world in which the future is female may look like. The story is the perfect counter piece to Margaret Atwood’s A Handmaid’s Tale. In 1961, Consider Her Ways was most definitely science fiction. Today, some prominent feminists propose in earnest that 80 percent of all human males should be either castrated or, better, eradicated. Biological science has moved that into the realm of possibilities. Pathological agents do exist that could easily target all of the men in the world or perhaps only men of a certain race.
Nobody in a normal state of mind would ever contemplate anything like that, you say? Reconsider. Although the term madwoman is rarely used, it does identify a human condition to which men don’t hold a monopoly. There are a lot of women who work in biological sciences. They may have the necessary motivation and the required opportunity to achieve exactly what is being described in Consider Her Ways.
Most definitely, many feminist writers addressed the theme of the total eradication of all human males. The idea is a recurring theme of feminist science fiction. I don’t recall seeing the corresponding theme of the eradication of all females ever having been mentioned by male authors.
Consider their ways:
January 11, 2000
Daily News, at yahoo.com (The article can no longer be accessed at the original source.)
Aussie scientists stumble across the Doomsday Bug
PARIS, Jan 10 (AFP) – Australian gene engineers accidentally created a mouse virus that kills every one of its victims by wrecking their immune system, a discovery with the potential for making the ultimate terrorist weapon,New Scientist reports. The killer bug was invented quite inadvertently, while the researchers were trying to create a contraceptive vaccine for mice as a pest control, the British weekly reports in next Saturday’s issue.
They inserted into a mousepox virus a gene that creates large amounts of interleukin 4 (IL-4), a naturally-occurring molecule that produces antibodies in the immune system. The idea was to stimulate antibodies to destroy eggs in female mice, thus making the rodents infertile.
Mousepox, a close relation to smallpox, normally only causes mild symptoms among the type of mice being used in the study, and was only being used as a vehicle to deliver the IL-4. But when the IL-4 gene was inserted, the engineered virus ran amok, attacking the “cell-mediated response” – the part of the immune system that fights viral infection. All the animals in the study were wiped out in just nine days. Worse, the engineered virus was astonishingly resistant to vaccines. A vaccine that would normally protect these mice from mousepox only worked in half of the mice exposed to the killer version.
Co-researcher Ron Jackson, of the Canberra-based institute CSIRO, said the discovery was a frightening indicator of what could happen if the human smallpox virus was similarly modified. “It would be safe to assume that if some idiot did put human IL-4 into human smallpox, they’d increase the lethality quite dramatically,” he told New Scientist. “Seeing the consequences of what happened in the mice, I wouldn’t want to be the one to do the experiment.”
“It’s surprising how very, very bad the virus is,” said Anne Hill, a vaccine expert from Oregon Health Sciences University in Portland, Oregon.
Smallpox has been eradicated as a disease thanks to a global vaccination campaign, although two laboratories – one in the United States, the other in Russia – still have ampoules containing the virus, under an arrangement with the World Health Organisation (WHO).
The incident highlights how easy it could be for some with bio-engineering knowledge to create a murderous virus for which there would be no cure or effective vaccine, New Scientist said.
“Vast amounts of time and effort have gone into policing the military’s use of biotechnology. But the activities of civilian biologists have been ignored,” it said. “Yet genetic engineering techniques are now so widespread that potentially dangerous results are bound to emerge accidentally.”
It suggests tougher vetting of research proposals; a greater effort to train students in biological subjects about potential dangers arising from lab work; and encouraging greater openness among biologists to discuss the misuse of genetic engineering.
The material contained in the quoted article is made available courtesy contributors and editors of Pro-LifeE-News.
One may think that such ideas and possibilities are too horrible to think about, but that is not so. Some feminist are seriously considering how to get rid of men, to make it happen that the future is female. It is not too unthinkable that some mad feminist scientist of the feminist variety, male or female, is at work right now to make that a possibility.
The horror of the thought is not that it is in the realm of what is possible, but that when some feminists publicly propose the possibility and discuss it, the idea does not get condemned but is either welcomed or at the very least condoned or tolerated by all other feminists. The horror is that not a single voice of protest was raised in the feminist camp when just that happened, when Sally Miller Gearhart proposed that the number of men in the world must be reduced by 80 percent, and what means should be used to achieve that goal. See Why have any men at all?
John Wyndham, speculates what such a future will look like, in Consider Her Ways And Others (Science Fiction, Penguin Books Canada Ltd, 2801 John Street, Markham Ontario L3R 1B4; ISBN 0-14-002331-7, First published by Michael Joseph 1961, first published in Penguin books in 1965.) The book contains:
This short story is the perfect counter piece to Margaret Atwood’s A Handmaid’s Tale. It’s a story about a society in which all males were eradicated after a genetic experiment designed to exterminate brown rats — specifically the male rats — had gone wrong, a society that is a radical feminist’s (a.k.a. redfem) dream, one that is fashioned after the Bible quotation “Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways.”
Read it and decide which, Margarete Atwood or John Wyndham, is the true prophet.
Read it and shudder, because it seems that we are well on the way of bringing it about.
Read it and weep.
- Oh Where Now is Peggy MacRafferty?
- A Stitch in Time
- Random Quest
- A Long Spoon