According to a report published in January 2000 by the population division of the United Nations in New York, under the title “Immigration replacement: A solution to declining and aging population,” Europe will need to accept 159,000,000 Islamic migrants by 2025.
Source: “The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan – The genocide of the Peoples of Europe“
(h/t to Waldemar Fettke)
Thereby Europe will be forced into accepting and funding is own genocide. It is perhaps not so important to focus on the individuals responsible to make all of that work out as intended, as it is to consider the master plan that drives the intentions of the genocide of the peoples of Europe. One should not think for a moment that the United Nations Population Division, a massive bureaucracy in its own right, exists for the sole, benign purpose of merely and nothing more than “providing the international community with up-to-date and scientifically objective information on population and development.”:
REPLACEMENT MIGRATION: IS IT A SOLUTION TO DECLINING AND AGEING POPULATION?
United Nations Population Division
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- All of the report sections and much more; the report is massive, as is the related collection of documents, but the report is very well indexed and easy to navigate.
“Replacement Migration” is a euphemism for the genocide of undesired sectors of the population of the world, those that have predominantly Euro-centric roots, Euro-centric cultural heritages and Euro-centric sentiments. Without any doubt, the UN-sponsored mass-Islamic migration that presently inundates virtually all developed nations of Europe (Poland is an exception that has therefore attracted the wrath of the EU and UN bureaucrats), but that is not the whole of it.
What glares by its absence in the UN report is any mention of the common-sense, most-practical and least-troublesome direction for policies aimed at correcting or at least halting the growing gap between rapidly waxing elderly, non-productive populations sectors and the corresponding younger, productive population sectors necessary to support the former. That is, the promotion of pro-family policies that will result in home-grown solutions to the birth dearth plaguing individual nations and regions. It would be much preferable to the replacement and consequential genocide of the people with European ancestry.
No country’s and no region’s culture can possibly, without pain and suffering, assimilate a massive influx of Islamic migration from underdeveloped nations (at a rate of as much as and more than six percent, annually, of its resident population). The migrants (from nations in turmoil because of internal, ideological clashes) will not only continue the strife they wish to escape from but add to it in the countries that host them. That is an unavoidable, defensive reaction aimed at preserving their own cultural, ideological, and national identities — extremely few of them wish to integrate, to become assimilated. It manifests itself in the migrants’ hostility against the resident populations, languages, and cultural traditions of the host countries that are being forced to accommodate them. Still, it all will serve well to promote and to further the genocide of the peoples of Europe.
God have mercy.