Dr. Warren Farrell: Making a $50 Contribution

June 6, 2011 by Walter Schneider.

I am a bit late with opening my e-mail, but I got a pleasant surprise when I did, a message from Dr. Warren Farrell:

Dear Fathers for Life, As you know, I’ve listed you on my web site for years to let people who know of me also know of you. Father and Child Reunion has just become available as an e-book via Amazon’s Kindle. I’ve been touched to hear from many of the thousands of dads who were inspired by Father and Child Reunion to fight for their child’s right to their dad. I am sure you have helped many of these dads and their children. I’m pleased with the book’s availability as an e-book, since many dads are more comfortable reading e-books than wandering through book stores’ self-help sections! To jump start the book’s availability as an e-book and simultaneously celebrate Father’s Day, I will make a contribution of $50 to your organization if ten or more people from your organization purchase it for $9.99 any day in June. In essence, I will be giving you $5–or half the book’s price–for each of the ten e-books purchased. The only thing I will need from you is the name, city and email address of the ten people who have told you that they have made a purchase. In the meantime, I’d love to hear how things are going for your group; feel free to send me an email so we can catch up. Warren

Posted in Books & Films, Organizational News | Print | No Comments »

…good will toward men?

December 25, 2010 by Walter Schneider.

From the website of the Family of Men Support Society:

“NO MEN ALLOWED”
Misandry at the government level (City of Calgary , Province of Alberta , Government of Canada ) and at community level agencies.

No Men Allowed to participate at any meetings, therefore male victims of female-perpetrated domestic violence are denied a voice.

The system is autocratic, exclusive & misandrist.

The system is not democratic, inclusive or open minded.

Posted in Organizational News, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Civil Rights, Battered Men's Shelters, Violence by Proxy, False Allegations, Media Bias, Censorship, Propaganda Exposed, The New World Order, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Health, Men's Issues, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

Research on Domestic Violence against Males

November 28, 2010 by Walter Schneider.

A search facility has been installed at the Family-Violence Index Page of Fathers for Life, courtesy by DVStats.org.

Also by courtesy of DVStats.org, at the end of the links in the left side-bar menu on the Family-Violence Index Page of Fathers for Life, there is now a widget that will let you find out about the latest DV research that has been published.

DVStats.org — a search engine, aggregating research that examines the impact and extent of domestic violence upon male victims.

This search facility equates domestic violence to intimate partner violence between men and women in relationships.  It does not provide information on violence between homosexuals, siblings or violence against family members other than heterosexual partners and spouses, such as infanticide, child abuse or violence against elderly in families.

Posted in Organizational News, Child Abuse, Health, Child Murder, Family, Women's Violence | Print | 1 Comment »

The trouble with spousal murder statistics

November 4, 2010 by Walter Schneider.

Plus, how to use the site-specific search feature at the website of Fathers for Life.

Today someone asked about the discrepancies between the reported numbers of spousal murders of men as identified by police forces and the numbers of convictions for spousal murders of men.

In my response I explained what the reasons for the discrepancies are and also how the site-specific search feature at the website of Fathers for Life (affiliated with this blog) can be used to quickly and conveniently find answers to such questions and other questions.

Hello Fred,

Thanks for writing and for your kind words.

You posed a good question, the answer to which is to some extent already available at the website of Fathers for Life.  I will get to that a little later, right after I first comment on something you wrote.  You stated,

So, if it’s just court verdicts Stats Can is counting, there’s probably alot men dying at the hands of their spouses that those yearly statistics show.

I will make the assumption that the sentence contains a couple of typos and should have read, “So, if it’s just court verdicts Stats Can is counting, there’s probably a lot more men dying at the hands of their spouses than those yearly statistics show.”  Whether or not you had intended to write that, it is what you should have asked.  Therefore I will respond based on that premise.  However, the answer to the question will go to considerable length.  The problem is far more complex than a first glance indicates.

The problem with murder statistics that you identified exists, but no one knows how large it is.  The inaccuracy of statistics pertaining to spousal murders of men is far more serious than the preamble to your question implies.

You seem to assume, as many other people who think about it do, that there are bound to be considerable differences in the number of spousal murders by women of their spouses as reported by the police and as reported based on convictions.  That assumption is correct, but it is by far not the only reason for the differences.  That difference alone exists because of judicial bias, but police reports on spousal murders are affected by bias as well.  Therefore one cannot simply subtract one number from the other and state that the difference identifies how wrong the statistics on murder convictions are.

To begin with, one would have to account for murders reported and for murderers exonerated at their initial trial, which trial could then also be the last in a given case, but not necessarily so. Then one would have to account for wrongful murder convictions on account of which prison sentences where or are being served, In Canada we have had quite a few of them over the years.  I have never been able to determine whether the exoneration of a murderer, say in 1999, resulted in a corresponding downward correction of the murder convictions for the year in which the conviction occurred, say in 1979, and in a corresponding downward correction of the number of reported murders in the year in which the actual murder occurred, say in 1976.  The same sort of problem exists with an exoneration during the initial murder trial, although then the time span between the year of the reported murder and the year of the murder trial may be no more than two, three or four years.

I am not aware of anyone watching for that cause of inaccuracies in murder statistics and making the appropriate corrections, although when it comes to accounting for money, we know that auditing procedures generally take into account every single cent.  It can therefore be safely said that accuracy in reporting of murder statistics is considered to be less important than the accuracy required in tracking expenditures of a single cent.

Still, the causes of statistical errors in the reporting of murder statistic I discussed so far only scratch the surface of the problem.  For instance, we must also look at the problem of murders that do not come to trial and of murders that the police do not report.  You may argue that it is quite inconceivable that murders are not reported because things are quite simple in that respect, namely that any death that is not from natural or accidental causes is necessarily caused by murder.  However, police bias and bias by coroners come into the picture, and no one can tell accurately whether some or how many natural or accidental deaths were not murders.

With respect to women murdering their husbands or boyfriends, two important things come into the picture.  One is that poison is the favorite murder weapon used by women.

Moreover, women are more likely than men to hire or entice someone else to commit the deed, someone who is routinely convicted of the resulting murder, while the instigating women go free or at worst get away with a conditional or nominal sentence.  What is truly a spousal murder then naturally is counted into the general murder statistics and not as a spousal murder.  No one has to my knowledge established accurate figures on how often that happens.  We only know that it happens and that it happens often.

All that we know for certain is that murders of women are far more likely to be resolved as to who the perpetrators were than is the case with men who got murdered, and that the number of unsolved murders of men (roughly one third of all murders of men) whose murderers were never brought to trial is about equal to the number of women who have been murdered.  It is up to anyone’s imagination what proportion of unsolved murders of men were spousal murders.

There is much more to all of this.  Consider for instance what “FBI Statistics on Spousal Murder” states about some of the issues involved.  Here is a summary of some of those and some other issues pertaining to respective biases for and against men and women with respect to murders:

1. More so than at any time during human history, on account of thirty years of active and escalating propaganda against men, women are today far less likely to be considered to be capable of committing any kind of violence, all evidence to the contray.  That is reflected in statistics relating to ratios of incarceration of the sexes. (see Domestic Violence Against Men, 1999)
2. When individuals of either sex commit crimes of equal severity, women are far less likely to be suspected, less likely to be indicted, and less likely to be convicted.  If they are convicted, in the U.S. they receive on average a sentence that is one-third the duration of what men will receive.  In Canada, they are likely to go free on parole.However, even if they are made to serve a sentence, they are more likely to be released early on parole.  In all of Canada there are currently no more than 150 women in federal prisons.  The total capacity of our prison system is no more than 250 women!  It stretches the imagination to pretend that these large differences are due to the inherent inculpability of women, yet that is precisely what feminist gender-activists would like us to believe and accept as the truth…. (see Domestic Violence Against Men, 1999)

Fred, you must understand that it takes a considerable amount of time and effort to answer a question like yours.  It has been a few years since anyone asked such a question here, for which reason I thought that I comment in detail.  After all, others may have some questions like that, and I hope that, like you, they will benefit from what I will tell you now, and for which reason I posted all of this to Dads & Things.

I strongly suspect that you did not use the site-specific search tool accessible in the upper right-hand corner at virtually all of the web pages at Fathers for Life.  You will greatly benefit by doing so.  Our website is very large, in excess of a thousand web pages. To work your way through that to gain an impression on a specific issue is like memorizing an encyclopedia before you form an opinion on a given subject.  No one uses an encyclopedia that way, and neither should anyone use the website of Fathers for Life like that.

All of that is explained in more precise detail at our home page.  Did you read our home page?  It seems not, although it is fairly short.  Yet, if you had done so, you might not even have felt the need to write and would have been able to come up with a clear answer to your question without going through the trouble of doing it in writing.

Check what the search engine can do for you on the topic of “spousal murder“.  That might lead you to narrow your search to “spousal murder statistics“.  That in turn may eventually lead you to ask whether “women are “less likely to be suspected”“.

Such a train of thoughts and searches may also lead you to something else that should be of great interest with respect to the pro-female and anti-male bias in feminist jurisprudence, serial murder.

Searching in that manner works exactly like how you would use an encyclopedia, which, as our homepage states, is exactly what our website is, except that instead of having to pull down volumes from your bookshelf, turning a lot of pages and looking up references in the same laborious fashion, you have things far easier, and you spend far less time searching for an answer.

If I would have known, when I started our website about 16 years ago, that Wikipedia would come into existence, I would have chosen a different domain name, perhaps manopedia (not good because of some connotations that feminists would surely have brought into play) or familypedia, and you would perhaps have had no problem with figuring out how to use our website in the most efficient way.

So, to you and anyone else who may be reading this: Use the site-specific search feature, the workings of which are explained at our home page under How to navigate this website.

I receive between 300 to 500 messages a day (not counting spam).  A good portion of those are inquiries like yours.  I cannot possibly answer all of them, but you can save yourself the trouble of asking me a question that you can easily find the answer to yourself.  Most importantly, you will save me from being swamped with e-mail and you from running the risk of not having your question answered.

Posted in Organizational News, Judiciary, Web Statistics, Men's Issues, Propaganda Exposed, Feminist Jurisprudence, Women's Violence | Print | 1 Comment »

Seven million visitors!

July 2, 2010 by Walter Schneider.

The men’s movement cometh

You may wish to consider what is being stated in this video:

Research Biased Against Men We all know about male bashing on television. Sadly, there is a similar bias in mental health research. This video give a quick glimpse into three studies which show this anti-male bias. YouTube video by MenAreGood - 10 min.

If you wonder where those two goodies (the photo and the link to the video) came from, there’s a lot more like them at this website.

Enjoy…

By the way, I happened to notice today that the website of Fathers for Life now ranks in 457,800th place of all websites in the world.  That is because traffic volume increased 20 percent during the past month.  Incidentally, the total number of visits to the website of Fathers for Life is now at more than seven million.

–Walter

Posted in Organizational News | Print | No Comments »

Dads & Things blog-updates back in operation

July 23, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

For about a week now, the online access for F4L was out of commission.

The modem quit working but is now back in operation.  Shaw Cable, the high-speed service provider saw fit to send a new modem through the mail service.  That took a week, even though it would probably have been faster to give one of their service technician a new modem to drop off at our address — given that a technician is in our town virtually every day.

Anyway, that is now water under the bridge and no more than to be expected from a monopoly.

All that remains to be done now is to catch up on software updates.  After that there will be the regular updates (now a bit less frequently than before my heart attack in February).

Sorry for the delay, but things will be somewhat more normal from now on.

–Walter

Posted in Organizational News | Print | 1 Comment »

Children need families, not 50/50 parenting

February 2, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

What children need - not 50/50 shared parenting but to be raised in the Family founded on Marriage and for the State to stop attacking the institution and instead obey the law and assist it when asked.

By Roger Eldridge
Feb. 2, 2009

I am writing this to Charles, who asked how the Council could help him achieve the presumption of 50/50 shared parenting after a “split.”

If you go to our website http://www.family-men.com you will see our position. Read it all, not just the “About Us” section which was put up seven years ago. It remains accurate but we have moved on.

You won’t find support for “equal custody” on there because we have found after ten years serious research and experience in this that the solution to children suffering from the Family being disintegrated is something else and we know, as men, that once you analyse the problem the solution pops out.

For a start there is no such thing as a “split”. This euphemism is used because it is not politically correct in the feminist state to allocate any reasons for relationship or Marriage breakdown - except that it is caused by men. In fact, under this regime, the fundamental principle of the Courts and government policy is the extraordinary presumption that relationships break down spontaneously by mutual agreement. This allows the State to promote the myth of “no-fault” separation and divorce. The state then claims that it is just facilitating the couple who wish to separate.

The spontaneous and free movement of two halves of formerly integral matter away from each other does not happen in Nature, has never been recorded in Science and does not happen in human relationships.

Until the last fifty years and the advent of feminism with its abhorrence of anything rational, it was accepted that relationship breakdown begins with one of the spouses losing their commitment to the promises they made when they became one flesh.

Like you and many others I was seduced into joining in the victim game and campaigned for many years for the “equality” panacea on the basis that women would not initiate a separation if it meant they would lose time with their children and would not be provided for financially.

Sadly, whilst it would deter some women, it might and probably would encourage many more fathers and mothers by the predictable outcome, to give up on their commitment to the Family they took on when they first opened themselves to the procreation of children.

All the evidence - and there is volumes of it - show that children suffer from EVERY separation, not just the “bad ones” where they are ripped from one parent but from all separations, including those where mercifully one parent is not encouraged and enticed by the corrupt family Law system to destroy the other parent and his relationship with his children.

If you think about it, your duty, whether you are Married or not, is to provide for, educate and protect your child. That means every day until the day you die.

Doing it as much as 50% of the time means you are failing your child the other 50% of the time and they suffer, believe me.

What a child wants and needs is security, stability and predictability in their life. The evidence shows that they don’t care if you and their mother argue all the time and it also shows they prosper better if you stay together despite the rows. They basically want their daddy and their mummy in their life EVERY MINUTE OF THEIR LIVES, not at weekends, not for an hour in the evening three times a week and neither do they want one or two weeks with one parent and then the reverse.

The 50/50 may be good for the parents because they can get on with their life and may be marginally better for children than a lop-sided arrangement but it will never be “good for them”.

As parents - see below the report by the Family Rights Institute of Ireland - we are expected to give our lives for our children and until the last forty years that is what parents did.

Marxism, the ideology of the subversive Statists/Fabians/Feminists, requires an atomised society so that the State can easily control its every move. The Family with its Christian values and extended family “in law” creates bonds that can never be shaken and represents an enormous barrier to their plans. The radical left-wing inflitrators have clandestinely subverted the organs of the State in the Western world and have mercilessly attacked the institution of the Family founded on Marriage.

You can, of course, succumb to their devilish plot or fight them back. We have chosen to do the latter. What aids our position is that we have the Rule of Law and the Constitution on our side. The changes that we all perceive to have taken place are all illusory and merely propaganda put out by their allies in the media. The law has not changed from its founding roots. It can’t so we see our job as restoring the law and ousting the subversives who are side-stepping the democratic process. When was the last time you heard any politician or political party talk about Family law in their manifesto. I guess it is never because they never have.

These so-called reforms were instigated by shadowy persons behind the scenes. Fortunately despite their claims and rhetoric the law can be used to protect Families and children.

We just need a critical mass of the untapped power of men in the Fathers/Family Movement to see the error of being led by the nose towards 50/50 which translates into leaving our kids unprotected and undirected for half their lives and to row in behind the law so that they can again ask a woman to be their wife, safe in the knowledge that the law works as shown below and will defend their right, as long as they conduct themselves appropriately, to properly parent their child EVERY MINUTE OF THEIR LIFE!

If you have any questions please ask

God bless, Roger Eldridge
Chairman, National Mens Council of Ireland, Knockvicar, Boyle, Co. Roscommon
familymen@eircom.net www.family-men.com 07196-67138 086-8180146

***

What children need - to be raised in the Family founded on Marriage and for the State to stop attacking the institution and instead obey the law and assist it when asked.

The Family founded on Marriage is the embodiment of Christian teaching in action.

The institution of the Family founded on Marriage existed prior to the State.

The Family founded on Marriage is a unit and by definition has its own sovereignty with its own Constitution and authority.

The State is not a parent.

Therefore the institution of the Family founded on Marriage is antecedent to and morally superior to the State and to all positive law. The legitimate role of the State relative to the Family founded on Marriage must respect the Subsidiarity Principle and be confined to providing assistance - and only where voluntarily required - by the heads of the Family - the Husband and Wife - acting with the joint power and authority vested bin them to carry out their duties on behalf of the Family.

The purpose and intention of parliament in the context of Family Law must be consistent with the foundational principles outlined above.

In practice this means that all primary legislation - in the form of statute, all secondary legislation - in the form of statutory instruments, court rules and regulations and all tertiary legislation - in the form of government policy and guidelines must act, in a moral manner consistent with Christian teaching, to facilitate the better functioning and continuation as a unit of the Family founded on Marriage.

Thus it can be shown that every action of government must be “Married Family Mainstreamed” - it must form the basis for all policy planning and decision making. Currently “Gender Equality mainstreamed” controls all such policy formation despite it being inconsistent with and repugnant to the Common Good, which allows for policy to discriminate positively, as it must, on the basis of a person or group’s capacity and social function.

For all these reasons the institution of the Family founded on Marriage possesses rights which are inalienable and imprescriptible and superior to all positive law. This simply means that these rights can not be ceded or transferred to third parties and can not be superseded and regulated by the State through its organs, including the Courts. The single exception to this is where the parents have failed for moral or physical reasons and the State is obliged to step in to replace the parents - but only until the family can be rehabilitated.

On Marriage (from the French word meaning to take a Husband - “mari”) the couple become wedded and form “one flesh”. From that point they are obliged to act as one and this is acknowledged in the Law where it recognises that the heads of the Family jointly control all the assets that they have accrued together during the lifetime of the Marriage since their wedlock. These assets necessarily include the Family Home, any land or other property, all material goods and savings. The most important asset however is any children they are blessed with.

The Married Family, like all institutions has its own Constitution and authority where its sovereignty is given expression. It necessarily must have a structure and a hierarchy of responsibility and government. The heads of the Family are a committee of 2 which must make all decisions jointly that involve a third party, especially any organ of the State. Each of them individually, if they believe the children’s welfare and safety requires their intervention, also have the right, at any time, to veto any prior decision jointly made but can not unilaterally initiate the involvement of a third party.

As one would expect, where Marriage is the daily theatre in which we act out our Christian faith and teaching, the most important duty of a spouse flows from the covenant made with God in the Marriage ceremony where we vow to “love” each other and any children we might receive by the Grace of God.

This “love”, what we call unconditional love, is the authentic Christian love that was shown to us by God sending his own son Jesus Christ to sacrifice himself so that we might be saved. In the same way spouses are expected “for richer, for poorer, for better for worse, in sickness and in health” to sacrifice their own comfort, their own welfare and safety and in fact their own lives for the benefit of their spouse and children and the Family Unit as a whole.

Jesus reminds us that the two most important of God’s commandments are that we should love Him above all else - that material and selfish desires should be resisted - and that we should love our neighbour and our enemy as we love ourselves. This second commandment directs that the most important duty of a spouse, apart from the duty to self-sacrifice for the rest of the Family that flows from the first commandment, is to be open to reconciliation in these troubled times when it is all too easy tfor the other spouse to be painted as “the enemy”.

It is falsely stated that the primary duty of a spouse is to co-habit. Plainly, whilst for practical purposes it is usually the case that the Family all live together, the principles of family law do not support it as being critical. Many families exist and function well whilst the members of the Family reside in different locations. For example where the Husband may be in the services or in the merchant navy etc.

The genuine key principles that distinguish a Marriage are:

The spouses act jointly as a single unit in decision-making involving any third party;

The spouse act selflessly for the benefit of the Family as a whole and subordinate their own individual needs and wishes;

The spouses are continuously open to reconciliation.

The act of living together, ie merely co-habiting, has been falsely promoted as a defining duty of spouses precisely to create the potential for any pairing of two people - of opposite sex or same-sex - to co-habit in a Marriage-like manner and so blur the real requirement for the love - self control, submission to regulation and openness to reconciliation - characterised by the authentic Family founded on Marriage.

Family Rights Institute of Ireland, Knockvicar, Boyle, Co. Roscommon
familyrightsinstitute@eircom.net 07196-67138 086-8180146

***

In order to pay the wages and make a profit the media has learnt that their clients - readers, viewers, listeners, must be good consumers or else the advertisers will go elsewhere. The best consumers are overwhelmingly women - Maureen Gaffney of the National Economic and Social Forum estimates that at least 90% of financial decisions and purchases are now made by women - so to survive and be successful editors everywhere must fill the spaces between the ads with content (what in the old days used to be called “News”) labelled WAWMAA - stories that reinforce what women like to hear - ones that say Women Are Wonderful, Men Are Awful.

It’s not that editors like women and dislike men, it’s just good for business.

The mantra of big business is growth so their strategy has to be always to maximise profit through sales. For every cent they pay to a woman they know they will get it back immediately in sales. For them to hire women rather than men, wherever it is feasible, suits their purpose.

It’s not that managers and company directors like women and dislike men, it’s just good for business.

Since the seventies governments have acted exactly like big business. They now claim taxes from virtually every purchase made so, if they want to expand their empire, they have a vested interest in ensuring consumerism is maximised.

That means it makes sense for government, like the media and big business, to have policies which use WAWMAA to justify the transfer of control of the Family income from the man to the woman. Hence the built-in bias in the governments family Courts - both in Custody and Domestic Violence cases - and Child Support laws and decisions.

It’s not that governments like women and dislike men, it’s just good for business.

God bless, Roger Eldridge
Executive Director, Family Rights Institute of Ireland, Knockvicar, Boyle, Co. Roscommon
familyrightsinstitute@eircom.net 07196-67138 086-8180146

Posted in Media Bias, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Organizational News, Civil Rights, Divorce, Health, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, Propaganda Exposed | Print | No Comments »

Scotland - Children’s Rights Demo - 2009 03 04

January 31, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

(Update 2009 02 02: Note that the date and time for the Children’s Rights Demonstration have been changed to March 4, 2009, 11:00 a.m.)

Demonstration protesting against Social services (SS). Adopting children to strangers when grandparents and extended family with a little help could have coped adequately, keeping children in a stable home environment.

A foreign national left this on the Daily Mail comments section.

“…what is wrong with you people in this country that you allow your government to get away with this?”

That comment got to me and inspired me to organise this demo. .

We are holding a demonstration on Wednesday March 4th, 2009 at 11:00am
At George Square Glasgow.  Everyone invited. “bring yer ain piece”.

Reason:-  To highlight the terrible treatment of children and their extended families at the hands of our “out of touch Social Services departments “. and to demand  fairer treatment of our children and  families and that policies, more in line with the children’s welfare and the public’s wishes are immediately adopted by all Social Service Departments, who now appear to be wholly incompetent or to be acting as a law unto themselves with complete disregard for the children’s “Best Interests ” and the UN convention for the rights of the Child.  Further, we ask that the government incorporates the New Proposals by Grandparents Apart UK for greater inclusion for grandparents and wider family members.

Article 8

1.  States Parties undertake to respect the right of the child to preserve his or her identity, including nationality, name and family relations as recognized by law without unlawful interference.

Heartless SS snatch children, alienate them from their family - usually telling them their family does not want to see them again, then adopt them out without the consent of the children’s rightful parents or custodians.

To increase their field of takers the SS now adopt to gay and single people completely against 90% of the publics wishes, the latest being a girl who was afraid of men was adopted to two gay men. (What will that do to her?) whilst extended family are classed as “not relevant “.  This  is in complete disregard of the UN Convention, which the United Kingdom  has signed but continues to flout with impunity.

A beautiful business plan for commodities, but children and families are not commodities, they are human beings and need to be treated with love, respect and kindness for them to grow into decent citizens and family units.

Children who are separated from their entire extended family lose all stability and identity and are very often low achievers in society end up turning to gangs as a substitute for family comfort and to find the stability that was torn from them by incredible decisions made by Social Workers . They can become the thugs of tomorrow or, worse yet, suffer years of state-sponsored abuse. They lose all respect for anybody. Possibly the reason citizen’s and older people are afraid to go out alone at night.

Last year a petition was lodged with the Scottish parliament petitions by Grandparents Apart UK, asking the petition’s committee to urge the government to investigate if professionals that deal with children were actually working in the child’s best interests or their own. This petition was altered by the Scottish government, to read differently, and closed.

The Government of this country knows full well the feelings of the general public but choose to ignore or cover up the shambolic and criminal state of our Social services and their out of kilter policies. It is no longer time for petitioning and being ignored, when it comes to our children only protesting will get attention.

Cowardice asks the question ‘Is it safe?’ Expediency asks the question ‘Is it politics?’ But conscience asks the question, ‘Is it right?’ And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right.”

Contact :-

Jimmy Deuchars

Grandparents Apart UK
22 Alness crescent

Glasgow G52 1PJ
0141 882 5658

_____________
F4L: The concerns addressed by the demo are over the Scottish SS having waged a two-year-long court battle, thereby exhausting the resources of a Scottish couple, the grandparents of two children, a five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister, in their care.

They spent two years involved in court cases over the children, whose 26-year-old mother is a recovering heroin addict, and finally agreed to adoption when they were faced with mounting legal bills.

The 59-year-old grandfather, who has seven children of his own, told the Daily Telegraph: “There is no way we’d have allowed the children to be adopted if we’d known they were going to a gay couple….(Full Story)

It is a sad and grievously wrong situation when two loving grandparents are being crushed and robbed by the State of the grandchildren whom they were raising in a loving family.  There is no excuse for that abuse of power!

This is what it is all about:

“Human rights” laws are Orwellian doublespeak for giving “rights” to some people and taking them away from others.

– Henry Makow Ph.D.; January 28, 2009

Posted in Organizational News, Civil Rights, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Child-Custody Awards, The New World Order, Family, Child Abduction | Print | 3 Comments »

Spanish feminists use dirty tactics to take out opponents

January 30, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

URGENT: 3-2-2009, Judicial Political Case of Persecution of Spanish Man

By A. Javier M. M

Ever since the year 2001, many men and women in Spain have been fighting against the Gender Agenda. Not one of them got a penny for their efforts.

One of those men lives in the Spanish city of Burgos.

He knows a lot of laws on the procedure of civil courts, because for over 30 years until now (Year 2008,) he has been working in a financial company as legal adviser.

He has fought against feminist groups that kidnaps children from their homes and take them to feminist bunkers [women’s shelters], not only without anyone’s permission but without any supervision from any court.

This has been happening in Burgos, a city in Spain, since 2004 .

Not one judge has ever answered to inquiries on this issue that Mr. Jesus Ayala is fighting for.

Today, tomorrow or at any time any children from the city of Burgos city and area could become victims of feminist kidnappers.

The fathers of the kidnapped children not only are not being asked, but if they assert their paternal rights they are liable to become prosecuted by the courts.

Laws on privacy of information have been contributing and aggravating factors.

The feminists who infest Spanish politics routinely publish in newspapers the names and the addresses of men who are only alleged by women to have committed crimes, but have not yet been proven guilty after a trial in court.

Mr. Jesus Ayala has taken action on this, based on the Spanish agency for private information protection, and he managed to obtain a decision from that agency that found the feminists are guilty and need to be penalized .

Another issue pursued by Mr. Jesus Ayala led him to expose the practice by the European Union to channel money transfers to the Spanish government so that their friends in Spanish women’s associations will receive it instead. Furthermore, it was found that those women associations take women into care without court orders, and that, in doing, they prevent the establishment of a proper audit trail.

When such a woman has denounced a man (signed a criminal charge against a man for gender violence), the association reward her by giving her money.

As soon as the woman signs before the police criminal charges against the man for gender violence (since 2001, psychological and “structural” violence - for instance, not giving her enough money for “her needs” - are included in our penal-code), only with that, without trial in any court, the Women’s Association of Spain grants her the status of victim.  On the strength of that she is then included in economic programs, economic subsidies, preferences to have cheaper houses specific for women, preference (over other women) to get a job, etc..

Obviously, she is also included in the statistics on abused women, and so, the women associations have more ground to request next year more money from the European Union.

The feminists cannot take Mr. Jesus Ayala out of the game through clean and honest methods.

So, back in the year of 2005, in the city of Valladolid, Spain, a women that holds a high position in the Spanish, feminist-dominated and controlled government administration (Mrs Rosa Valdeon Santiago, then in charge of Family Politics in
the local government of Burgos and Valladolid) said in a newspaper (Diario de Burgos, 13-7-2005) that “they would prosecute” all those men of  affiliated with “any specific [men’s] association…”, “for their activities.”

What happens next?

On 3-2-2009, Mr. Jesus Ayala will have to attend a trial on the City of Valladolid, following an accusation against him, launched not by any familiar, but by a fiscal (very close to a national political party, Partido Popular, an agency that has the power to manage a lot of money from European Union for women’s campaigns and gives it to friends that are affiliated with “women’s associations”), to declare Mr. Jesus Ayala legally incapacitated.

This is not happening in the Soviet Union, in 1950. No, this is happening here and now, in Spain, in the City of Valladolid.

I urge you to contact (please, be polite ) not only the Court of Valladolid, but also your representatives.

Greetings,

A. Javier M. M.
Study Group Fathers and Children
Madrid, Spain.

Contact the Court that will hold the trial of Jesus on 3-February-2009.
Phone: +34.983-22.81.01 , +34.983-22.81.02
Fax: +34.983-22.81.34.

(The international phone code prefix for Spain is 34)

_____________
F4L: Canada experienced similar attempts at persecuting those men whom the feminists designated to be guilty of hate crimes against feminists.  It is a modern witch hunt.  As of now, those attempts have not gone very far (see Canada’s declaration of war against pro-family- and pro-male activists). However, one Canadian Fathers Right activist sued over that and lost, even though the judge handing down that decision agreed that the FR activist had a case.

Although Canada’s system of democracy is being subverted (to progress more and more towards a system of socialist totalitarianism), things have not yet progressed as severely as they did in Spain in such a short time. Perhaps that is a misperception, as the trend here, having begun in the 1960’s, with Pierre Elliot Trudeau, then Canada’s Prime Minister, imposing the active promotion of feminism as Canada’s state-religion, was much more gradual and may well have reached (at least with respect to the progress of the implementation of the agenda for the planned destruction of the family) similar proportions as it did in Spain within about a decade.

Spain experiences a feminist revolution and take-over.  Ours is a more gradual subversion by feminism, environmentalism and multiculturalism.  Ultimately both our countries, as do all developed nations, will suffer identical fates.

Look for instance at President Obama’s declaration of the need for pay equity for women.  Women’s lower earnings exist primarily because they work on average about 20 percent fewer hours at lower-paying jobs, a matter of personal choices. (See Pay equity for women doesn’t exist?)  In reality, to pay women less than men are being paid for equal work done is a crime, by law.  Why would one wish to promote laws to enforce laws, if nothing other than to appear to be catering to women and thereby to consolidate one’s political power?

Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Antonio Gramsci must be laughing and dancing in their graves.

Posted in Social-Destruction Enterprise, Organizational News, Judiciary, Men's Issues, Family, The New World Order, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

VAWA: Out of Control

January 12, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

RADAR ALERT

RADAR Launches New Campaign - VAWA: Out of Control

2009 01 12

Today RADAR launches a new campaign “Violence Against Women Act: OUT OF CONTROL” The campaign will highlight that despite spending billions of dollars over the last decade, VAWA-funded programs lack accountability and effectiveness, and are destroying families. Case in point are the advertisements that were run on the Dallas Area Rapid Transit last Fall that featured messages promoting harmful and false stereotypes.

During the next few months our campaign will highlight how the Violence Against Women Act has gone out of control. We will be asking you to help get out the word to your elected representatives and the media how the Violence Against Women Act is out of control, as well as how to reform VAWA.

Successfully reforming VAWA depends on your participation. Last year we have succeeded in stopping four out-of-control bills: I-VAWA, ABA earmarks, gun confiscation, and a House resolution. Please familiarize yourself with how the Violence Against Women Act is “Out Of Control” at http://www.mediaradar.org/how_is_vawa_out_of_control.php

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Date of RADAR Release: January 12, 2009

R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of men and women working to improve the effectiveness of our nation’s approach to solving domestic violence. http://www.mediaradar.org/.

Posted in Men's Issues, Organizational News, Family, Feminist Jurisprudence, Propaganda Exposed, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »