120 Fathers Rights Demonstrators in Fulda (Germany)

October 5, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Link to original article (in German)

A translation of the article into English is appended after the following comments.

It is worthwhile checking out the photos relating to the article.  They provide a few ideas for the wording and formats of placards that can be used on placards at other demonstrations elsewhere.

The photo in the main article shows expunged fathers writing (with chalk) the names of their children on the pavement in front of the Fulda Court Building.  Fulda is a German city with a population of about 60,000.

The slogans visible and legible in the photos related to the main article translate as follows:

13 photos in the related photo series:

1. “…and when do I get to see Dad?” (Link)
2. “Children’s Rights on Paper –
   Their Fathers are here today” (Link)
3. “Family-splitting
   instead of
   Splitting of Partners in Marriage”

   “You too have a right to both parents“”Both Parents for all Children” (Link)

4. “…and when do I get to see Dad?” (Link)
5. “Shared Custody”

   “Visitation that happens”
   (Sorry, that doesn’t make much sense to anyone who is not initiated, unless the absence of any other information implies that the visitation that happens is nil.) (Link)

6. The placard shown is of the Frankfurt Branch of the organization “Fathers Decampment [as for an uprising] for Children“. In addition to address details, the placard states “Two Parents for all Children” (Link)
7. “www.AktiveVaeter.de [active fathers] demand now:
   Custody-Right from Birth” (which says nothing about paternal rights after conception, but that exclusion is quite possibly deliberate — after all, would it be wise for anyone to deny mothers the exclusive right to kill unborn children?) Link)
8. “…and when do I get to see Dad?“(Link)
9. “Fathers Decampment [as for an uprising] for Children”

   “Men’s Commissioner”
   That implies that there is none, alluding to the fact that every developed nation has a government department for the “Status of Women” or for women but nothing comparable for men.  Sorry, but a sign like that is not of much help in promoting the causes of men, women and families.A discussion of why that is so would take too much space here.Let’s just say that only some of the initiated-few understand what the sign is getting at.  The philosophical complexity of the placard violates a few of the fundamental requirements for successful propaganda.  Hitler, who without a doubt was an expert when it comes to designing successful and effective propaganda, explained it like this:

   All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be. But if, as in propaganda for sticking out a war, the aim is to influence a whole people, we must avoid excessive intellectual demands on our public, and too much caution cannot be extended in this direction. … (Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter VI)

   “Shared Custody”

   (Link)

10. “www.AktiveVaeter.de [active fathers] demand now:
    Custody-Right from Birth”

    “Fathers Decampment [as for an uprising] for Children
    Local Chapter [Saar-] Pfalz“(Link)

11. “Men’s Commissioner“”Shared Custody“(Link)
12. Photo (used in the main article) shows expunged fathers writing (with chalk) the names of their children on the pavement in front of the Fulda Court Building.(Link)
13. “Men’s Commissioner”

    “Fathers Decampment [as for an uprising] for Children
    Local Chapter Saar-Pfalz“(Link)

Translation of the article in the Fuldaer Zeitung  (Fulda News):

120 Demonstrators in the Inner City

2008 10 05

FULDA “We are here and quite loud, because they steal our children!” That is how it resounded through the Inner City of Fulda.

With that slogan the organization “Fathers Decampment [as for getting an uprising underway] for Children” demonstrated for the strengthening of the position of fathers who after separations want to take over responsibility for their children.

About 120 demonstrators walked in connection with that through the Inner City.

And because the critique aimed mainly at politics, church and courts, the demonstrators went past the City Palace, the Cathedral and the Fulda District Court.

In front of the main gate of the Court Building, the fathers used chalk to write on the pavement the names of their children with whom they they may not and cannot have any contact.

The demonstration finished with a closing rally on the University Plaza.

The aim of the organization is for the implementation of more equal rights [sic] in child-access and -custody.
___________
Comment by Fathers for Life: Compulsory divorce (ostensibly “no-fault” divorce, almost exclusively imposed on fathers and husbands, almost always against their wishes, in about half of marriages that form) is the primary cause for the escalation of the systematic destruction of the fundamental building block of society, the family.  It is thereby virtually the sole reason why fathers are expunged from the lives of their children.

To restore the respect that society once had for fathers and families and therefore to promote respect and love between fathers and mothers and harmony in families would provide for a stable and productive society; as it once did before the family became deliberately deconstructed.

One gains the strong impression that the aim of demonstrations, such as the one in Fulda, held by expunged fathers is not to promote the reconstruction of families and society, thereby to re-establish the esteem in which society once held fathers, but it is to give complaining fathers an opportunity to promote social changes that will eliminate their being discriminated against when they are forced to live with the consequences of separation and divorce.

It appears that such expunged and complaining fathers want to have rights that are equal to those held by women in sharing the loot that can be gained by scavenging amongst the ruins, rubble and ashes produced by the war against  families and society.

Equally-shared parenting still gives children on average only half of the parenting that they are entitled to.

Only two parents who live for their children and cooperate with one another to raise their children to the best of their abilities while sharing the same roof with their children will produce the best outcomes for their children.

From the perspective of a child of divorce, two parents living apart and equally sharing custody still add up to only one whole parent.  The reality of that is reflected in the results of the measurement of the outcomes in children from families.  In general, children that are not raised by two married parents living under a common roof with their children display more than twice the level of undesired outcomes than do children in married families.

Under the sponsorship of the Heritage Foundation, Patrick Fagan produced a good number of reports that provide irrefutable evidence of the extensive destructiveness of divorce and fatherlessness with respect to outcomes in children of single-mother “families”.

Posted in Abortion, Divorce, Organizational News, Paternal Rights, Judiciary, Civil Rights, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, Propaganda Exposed, The New World Order, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

The Effect of Feminism on Canadian Society

September 27, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Barbara Kay, columnist at Canada’s National Post, in her speech at the 25th Anniversary Conference of REAL Women of Canada, The Effect of Feminism on Canadian Society (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 20 September 2008), in describing what has in effect become a totalitarian society dominated and controlled by feminist ideology and doctrine, stated:

….Nothing is more illustrative of the punitive character of feminist excesses than family court. Here is where misandry in its most open, cynical and pernicious form is found. Over 85% of contested custody suits end with mothers receiving sole custody over children. The remaining 15% divide children between other family members, agencies and fathers, so in fact fathers arrive at sole custody about 7% of the time.

Only an extreme systemic contempt for the value of a father’s role in the life of a child can explain such a disparity, and only an extreme prejudice against men in general can explain that contempt, and nobody pretends otherwise.

Indeed, one of the more chilling statements I have ever read, one that captures the casual acceptance of democracy’s fall from grace in family court was this from the National Association of Women and the Law: “Courts may treat parents unequally and deny them basic civil liberties and rights, as long as their motives are good.”…. (See Full Speech)

__________________________
More of Barbara Kay’s speeches

Although Barbara Kay did not dwell on it in her speech, the totalitarian system created and controlled by feminists such as in Canada now prevails in all developed nations and extends to virtually all developing nations, in what is becoming a truly feminist, global, socialist, totalitarian State.

Posted in Media Bias, Censorship, Education, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Organizational News, Judiciary, Civil Rights, Paternal Rights, Divorce, Health, Feminism, Propaganda Exposed, The New World Order, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

Fathers rights organizations in Winnipeg, Manitoba

September 23, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Amelia [not her real name] wrote:

Hi,

We are wondering if there is anyone in Winnipeg Manitoba to contact for some information or assistance in dealing with a nasty custody battle. The legal fees are huge and we are getting know where.

Amelia and Jim

Hello Amelia,

All custody battles are nasty, except for those people who like to engage themselves in them because those battles provide some gains or an income.

Legal fees are not truly ever huge, but lawyers fees most often are. That is because lawyers have and maintain a monopoly on the services they provide. Even though judges are lawyers, too, they seem to cost not so much to normal mortals, except when one begins to consider how much social engineering is being done by the judiciary, what the costs of that are and that all of those costs are being paid for through tax revenues that are being sucked out of our pockets.

It has been that for at least the 20 years I have been involved as an activists in issues such as those that threaten you now, that there never was any individual activist or fathers rights organization that anyone could be referred to in Manitoba.

Previously, a directory of Canadian equal parenting organizations never showed any listings for Manitoba. Still, Manitoba divorces, divorce courts and custody battles are just as devastating and destructive as are those in other provinces. However, as the identified directory shows, there is now one such organization in Manitoba, although I am not sure how or whether they can or will be of help to you.

If all else fails, consider that there is nothing preventing you from starting an effective and practical organization in Manitoba. Given the considerable number of inquiries about such (non-existent) organizations in Manitoba we received in Alberta over the years, the demand for services, advice and comradery offered by such an organization certainly appears to exist. It needs to be nothing more than the opportunity for parents in comparable circumstances to meet on a regular basis. It seems that a newspaper ad, run for about a week, would result in a good list of interested individuals.

Be careful about selecting a lawyer. We have often been asked for advice on that, so often that we posted some generic advice on how to select a lawyer, contained in the following articles.

• How to select a lawyer
• Request for help with excessive child support
• A case of paternity fraud

Hope that helps,

Walter Schneider
http://fathersforlife.org
http://blog.fathersforlife.org

Posted in Organizational News, Paternal Rights, Divorce, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, Shared Parenting, Family | Print | No Comments »

Why we need a men’s movement

September 22, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Angry Harry put up links to excellent videos at his website.  You need to see those. (The first items listed at the top of the home page.)

1. The first video, “Why we need a men’s movement”, and its related short video clips, address the consequences of years and decades of discrimination against men.
2. The second set of videos is about the causes of discrimination against men.  Those are ten free segments of  a full documentary (available for sale on a CD by indoctrinate-u.com) that relate to the abrogation of academic freedom, but also illuminate many other issues, such as the lack of men’s studies programs, while women’s studies programs abound.

Both sets of videos are specific to the US.  However, anyone who has been following the evolution of feminist social engineering can affirm that the all-out promotion of women’s programs only and the loss of academic freedom are generic and universal problems that affect primarily all developed nations.

Posted in Organizational News, Suicides, Men's Issues, Feminism, Paternity Fraud | Print | No Comments »

California, Dale O’Leary to give Talks on Marriage Amendment

September 21, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

From Dale O’Leary:

I will be speaking on the Marriage Amendment in California. Here is the schedule.

Dale O’Leary
author of One Man, One Woman

Mon. Sept. 22 7pm Talk at St. Mel’s Church in Sacramento

Wed. Sept. 24 7pm Talk at San Diego Diocesan Pastoral Center

Thurs Sept. 25 7pm Talk at St. Joseph Communication Center in Covina

Posted in Organizational News, Health, Gay issues, Family | Print | No Comments »

Epitaph for a charter member of the Equal Justice Foundation

September 10, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

By Charles E. Correy, Ph.D.

It was with great sorrow that I learned of the death of charter member Steven Bandusky on August 27, 2008, from liver and kidney failure. When we first heard from Steve on August 10, 2000, he was a successful engineer with Boeing in Mesa, Arizona.

He had built what his boys called the “big house” for his family, wife, her two daughters, and two boys of his and his wife. With about 5000 square feet and a full basement, it truly was a big house. The boys loved to play in it. Unfortunately about a year after they moved in, things started to get a bit stressed with his wife Sylvia. Maybe it was the money, which was thin then, or maybe they grew a bit distant because of his schedule at work and trying to make ends meet.

At approximately 11:30 PM, on Monday, January 31, 2000, Steve was awoken by the sound of someone knocking on his bedroom door. It turned out to be two City of Mesa police officers informing him that he was being forced from his residence under an ex parte domestic relations restraining order.

All that he could think was that he had been woken up by the Gestapo in Germany. In utter disbelief  he asked to see the court order. Yes, there it was in black and white, an order stating that he had committed an act of domestic violence against his spouse, his two stepdaughters, and two young sons pictured below.

After trying to convince the officers that this was total nonsense, he asked them if they saw any evidence of domestic violence against his family members. They said no, but reiterated that they had no choice in the matter but to follow the letter of the court order. One of the officers even mentioned that the action he was ordered to take against Steve was wrong, yet he still had to act on the direction of the court order. So after packing an overnight bag, Steve said goodbye to the house he had just built for his family.  He then found himself driving around Mesa at midnight looking for a place to stay. Eventually he went to work instead.

It turned out that Steve’s wife had gone to his mother and borrowed $100 that Monday and used the money to go to court and file the ex parte restraining order against him.

With the house being just a year-old, Steve was still doing landscaping.  When hit with the restraining order there were dangerous open trenches. Being an engineer, Steve was concerned about the danger to pedestrians and others if the trenches were left open. Thinking the legal system was just, he obtained a modification of the restraining order to return to the house and fill in the trenches. The modification expired at 5 PM but Steve was still working away at 5:30 trying to finish up. His wife then called the police and had him arrested for violating the terms of the order.

As usual, Steve was convicted of domestic violence for violating the restraining order in the kangaroo county court after some dispute between the City of Mesa and Maricopa County as to who got to put the noose around his neck for trying to be a good citizen. He vainly attempted to get a jury trial for the criminal charge but was denied.

Incidentally, a November 20, 2000, letter to Arizona Senator John McCain about his situation went unanswered. And Steve’s pro se appeal through the state courts was denied and certiorari was denied by the US Supreme Court.

Of course with the conviction for violating a restraining order he was denied custody of his two boys although he did have two weekends a month visitation.

Real domestic violence

Meanwhile his wife’s new boyfriend had moved into the house with the stepdaughters and the two boys. Within a year she had a new baby by him to add to the “family.” As often happens with women looking for a little “excitement” in their lives they take up with an abusive male. Apparently Sylvia still couldn’t keep her knees together, or something else set off the resident boyfriend.

On April 27, 2002, Steve visited the marital residence to discuss the re-positioning of some trees in the front yard that she had planted directly over the septic system. When he arrived approximately 10-12 police vehicles/officers/detectives were parked in front of the house.

Steve quickly got out of his car to find out what was going on. He approached one of the detectives and was told there had been a shooting. After just about passing out from fear that his sons had been injured he was told they were safe with a neighbor down the street.

Apparently Sylvia, Steve’s now ex-wife, was shot in the back of the head with a 12-gauge shotgun by her resident boyfriend while the children were in another room. Fortunately for Steve the police had the perpetrator in custody. So he was not considered a suspect, as would usually have been the case.

After finding out from the detective that the boys were safe and sound with some neighbors, Steve informed the police that he was going to go get them. They informed him that he couldn’t due to the fact that he did not have sole custody and couldn’t take them without a court order. They also informed him that this was a criminal investigation and that they wanted to question the boys, who were in the house at the time of the shooting.

At the time Steve still naively believed he had rights as a father and made the mistake of getting mad at the police, never a good thing to do, especially when they are conducting a murder investigation. The police then ran a check on Steve and found he had an outstanding warrant for his arrest. He hadn’t attended the DV treatment courses after being convicted of violating a restraining order when he attempted to finish the landscaping project. So Steve got arrested and taken to jail once again.

After posting bond he went back to get the boys only to find the police had taken them into custody for questioning.

Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Steve was lucky in that, after an investigation, child “protective” services gave him custody of his two boys after his wife was murdered. My understanding is that the new baby went with its maternal grandparents. I don’t know what happened with the stepdaughters. Perhaps they went back with their father but Steve did keep in touch with them.

As with everyone who goes through these injustices and traumatic events, Steve developed PTSD, severe in his case.  The stress caused him to perform poorly at work and he went on medical leave until he used that all up. Eventually, though, he lost his job with Boeing and remained unemployed as he was emotionally unable to concentrate.

After cleaning his wife’s brains and blood off the wall he managed to sell the “big house” and the boys certainly didn’t want to go back there. That gave him money to live on but, like many, he self-medicated the PTSD with alcohol. More alcohol was required as time went on and eventually his kidneys and liver failed.

Restraining orders kill

Through all the many emails from Steve he was trying to fix the problem, fight the issues and injustices in the courts, and care for his boys. There was never any violence in his marriage, only some arguments about money, and probably some estrangement due to his working too hard to try and pay for a new home and support a wife and four kids. For this, which we should admire, his life and family were destroyed.

If Sylvia had not taken out the restraining order there is a very good chance she would be alive today. And we can be reasonably certain Steve would not have crawled into a bottle to compensate for the incomprehensible injustices done him and his children.

Before he died Steve did arrange with the older of the stepdaughters to care for his now orphaned sons.  We can only hope the resilience of youth allows these now young men to go on to normal lives despite the tragedies their parents endured at the hands of a society and justice system gone mad.

May he finally rest in peace

While Steve lived I asked him many times to write his story so that others would know what was being done to him. After buying flowers for the grave of the boy’s mother on March 15, 2004, he wrote me the following message:

     “People have been after me for a few years now to write this story. I don’t know why it has taken so long to complete. I have started many times, but I am still in utter disbelief as to what has happened. I always seemed unable to finish. Maybe it was the pain, maybe the horror or probably just the absolute incredulity of the way our government “protects” us.

     The flowers were for the mother of my two young sons that we recently placed on her grave on what would have been her 39th birthday. This was the first time that I’ve taken them to view the gravesite of their mother. It was the first time that I thought that they were ready to be reminded of the horror of what had happened a few years ago in the “big house,” as they fondly called it. I found it a bit ironic as I watched the tears form in their eyes, to notice that just a mile away on the horizon, stood the hospital that Johnny and Robbie were born in, some 6 and 8 years ago. They were just 3 and 5 when the nightmare began.”

Go with God, Steve, for you the nightmare is finally over. I hope my few futile words provide some evidence of the horrors inflicted on you. Know that as long as I draw breath I’ll continue fighting these injustices in your name.

Your friend,

      Chuck
_____________________________________________________________________________

           Issues of interest to the Equal Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/  are:

Civilization                             http://www.ejfi.org/Civilization/Civilization.htm

Courts and Civil Liberties  http://www.ejfi.org/Courts/Courts.htm

Domestic Violence              http://www.ejfi.org/DV/dv.htm

Domestic Violence Against Men in Colorado http://www.dvmen.org/

Emerson case                                                      http://www.ejfi.org/emerson.htm

Families and Marriage                         http://www.ejfi.org/family/family.htm

Prohibitions and the War On Drugs  http://www.ejfi.org/Prohibition/Prohibition.htm

Vote Fraud and Election Issues         http://www.ejfi.org/Voting/Voting.htm
_____________________________________________________________________________

The Equal Justice Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) public charity supported entirely by members and contributions. Dues are $25 per year and you may join at http://www.ejfi.org/Join.htm.

Contributions are tax deductible and can be made on the Web at http://www.ejfi.org/join2.htm or by sending a check to the address above.

Federal employees can contribute through the Combined Federal Campaign. The EJF is listed in Colorado , Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming #18855.
______________________________________________
Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.
President

Equal Justice Foundation http://www.ejfi.org/
455 Bear Creek Road
Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906-5820
Personal home page: http://corry.ws
Curriculum vitae: http://www.marquiswhoswho.net/charleselmocorry/Default.aspx

The good men may do separately is small compared with what they may do collectively.

Benjamin Franklin

--

Posted in Suicides, Organizational News, Paternal Rights, Civil Rights, Divorce, Health, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, Men's Issues, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

Maurice Vellacott (MP) on F4J Crusade for Equal Parenting

August 23, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

HOUSE OF COMMONS

CANADA

Maurice Vellacott, MP
Saskatoon-Wanuskewin

Cross Canada campaign to support Equal Parenting and Vellacott’s Motion M-483 arrives in Saskatoon

For Immediate Release                                                             August 22, 2008

SASKATOON – Maurice Vellacott, M.P Saskatoon-Wanuskewin has tabled a Private Members Motion (PMM-483)  which  proposes changes to the Federal Divorce Act to enshrine the principle of Equal Parenting during and after divorce.

Fathers 4 Justice Canada (F4J Canada) has supported such legislative changes since 2003 and believes that such change is long over-due. To educate and gather popular support from fellow Canadians for this important legislative action, F4J Canada has launched a cross-country tour with the support and assistance from local groups and company sponsors.

F4J’s cross Canada campaign arrives in Saskatoon this Friday, August 22, before moving on to Regina on Saturday. The F4J Superheroes will be stopping at Diefenbaker Park at the WAM (We Are Many) arts and environmental festival that opens Friday at noon and will have many big name entertainers there. After the festival opening ceremonies, the F4J Superheroes at 12:30pm will be meeting up with Saskatoon-Wanuskewin MP, Maurice Vellacott at the Diefenbaker Park at the south-east corner of Ruth Street and St. Henry Avenue.

Mr. Vellacott welcomes all his constituents, Saskatoon residents and visitors to stop by and visit with him and the F4J Superheroes, at Diefenbaker Park, at the south-east corner of Ruth Street and St. Henry Avenue, during the WAM festival this Friday, August 22, from 12:30pm through the early afternoon.

Children and adults will receive bracelets promoting truth, justice and equality, temporary tattoos with a message about M-483 and the opportunity to have their picture taken with some of our now famous Everyday Superheroes and the F4J Barney Mobile. Pre-addressed/postage paid postcards will be available for all who want to support M-483 and equal parenting.

“We invite all concerned Canadians to join with us and make their support known and visible in spreading the message that the time has come to act,” said Vellacott.

M-483 is currently scheduled for its first hour of debate in the House of Commons on Wednesday, October 8.

– 30 –

For further comment, call (613) 992-1966 or 297-2249

Posted in Divorce, Organizational News, Paternal Rights, Men's Issues, Shared Parenting, Family, Child-Custody Awards, Feminist Jurisprudence | Print | No Comments »

Cross Canada “Equal Parenting after Divorce” Crusade

August 18, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Press Release:

FATHERS-4-JUSTICE (CANADA)

202-812 12th Street, New Westminster, BC V3M 4K1

National Coordinator: Kris Titus
T (888) F4J-CANADA or (888) 345-2262
E officefathers4justicecanada@gmail.com
W www.fathers-4-justice-canada.ca

Cross Canada Crusade to Support “Equal Parenting after Divorce”

Maurice Vellacott, M.P Saskatoon-Wanuskewin has tabled a Private Members Motion (PMM-483) which proposes changes to the Federal Divorce Act to enshrine “the principle of Equal Parenting After Divorce”.

Fathers 4 Justice Canada (F4J Canada) has supported such legislative changes since 1998 and believes that such change is long over-due. To educate and gather popular support from fellow Canadians for this important legislative action, F4J Canada will be launching a cross-country tour with the support and assistance from local groups. We invite all concerned Canadians to join with us and make their support known and visible in spreading the message that “the time has come to act”.

F4J Canada’s Everyday Superheroes Teamwill begin their crusade in Vancouver, BC on August 18, with a kick-off planned for August 17. The heroes plan on visiting major cities across the nation - from British Columbia to Newfoundland - during August and September. Their final destination is our Nation’s Capital. They plan on arriving in Ottawa ON on or before October 7, to coincide with the earliest date that the Honorable Maurice Vellacott M.P may present PMM-483 in the House of Commons.

Final plans are still being made, but at this stage we would like to ask your organization to help us in spreading the word about the F4J Canada Everyday Superheroes Team arrival in your town/city. Please see attached our CURRENT TENTATIVE Schedule with local contacts. Each local group may have additional event plans.

Of course all donations towards this momentous event are gratefully accepted!

Sincerely,

Board of Directors

F4J Fathers 4 Justice Canada

http://www.fathers-4-justice-canada.ca
http://www.mauricevellacott.ca

____________________

Itinerary for Edmonton: 

Time and Date: Noon, Aug 21, 2008 (Thursday)
Location: Edmonton, Alberta – City Hall
Contact: Melanie Greenfield - 780-710-1540

Edmonton Contact:

Melanie Greenfield – Director of Public Relations
ECMAS (Equal Child Maintenance & Access Society) Alberta
T(780)710-1540 E melanie.greenfield@gmail.com
W www.ecmas.org

Please be there.

Posted in Organizational News, Paternal Rights, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Shared Parenting, Family, Child-Custody Awards, Feminist Jurisprudence | Print | No Comments »

Study of ‘Parental Rights’ & the Family Law Reform Movement in the US

August 17, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Correction 2008 08 18: The story sent out by John Murtari and the comments pertaining to it that were posted here yesterday have been removed to focus attention on the all-important statement provided in the last paragraph in John Murtari’s message:

….Obviously, what someone sent me was a bit of satire on our efforts for reform. I don’t blame them for wanting to remain anonymous. It made me laugh, but it also exposed some bitter truths. What do you think? Best regards!

–
John Murtari
____________________________________________________________________
Coordinator AKidsRight.Org
jmurtari@AKidsRight.Org “A Kid’s Right to BOTH parents”
Toll Free (877) 635-1968(x-211) http://www.AKidsRight.Org/

_________________

Another comment by F4L (2008 08 18):

Obviously, the websites that had been identified in the spoof forwarded by John Murtari are not a representative sample of websites concerned with ‘Parental Rights’ & the Family Law Reform Movement in the US.  That is, they are representative only with respect to their individual rankings but not with respect to what they reflect.

There is a growing proliferation of websites for ‘Parental Rights’ and especially of websites for ‘Fathers’ Rights’, but one truth remains for virtually all of them:  Individually, they appear to have little public appeal.  That is deceiving, because collectively they and the individuals and organizations who operate and maintain them are becoming an important influence that drives a rapidly growing interest in family law reform.

Low-ranking websites that promote fathers’ rights and the traditional nuclear family may not seem to be important in the scheme of things, but collectively they constitute an important force and a very real civil rights movement based on the voice of the people.  They have become an important counter force against the incessant and escalating family-hostile propaganda that inundates all of the main-stream media.

The large and growing interest in family law reform throughout the developed nations is a consequence of the growing dissatisfaction with the destructive social engineering that since the 1960s intensified the implementation of the agenda for the planned destruction of the family.

–Walter

Posted in Divorce, Education, Organizational News, Paternal Rights, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

Fathers 4 Justice motorway protest causes 10 mile tailbacks into Heathrow

August 15, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Telegraph.co.uk

By Richard Alleyne

15 Aug 2008

A Fathers 4 Justice campaigner brought rush-hour traffic to a standstill by climbing a motorway gantry dressed as batman.

Full Story

Posted in Organizational News, Paternal Rights, Divorce, Men's Issues, Family, Feminist Jurisprudence | Print | No Comments »