You are currently browsing the archives for the Men's Issues category.
- Abortion (34)
- Anorexia Nervosa (6)
- Books (1)
- Censorship (33)
- Child Abduction (18)
- Child Murder (58)
- Child Support (7)
- Child-Custody Awards (53)
- Civil Rights (77)
- Divorce (83)
- Economy (5)
- Education (62)
- Family (205)
- Feminism (139)
- Feminist Jurisprudence (131)
- Gay issues (27)
- Health (83)
- Judiciary (35)
- Media Bias (58)
- Men and Women Work (35)
- Men's Issues (229)
- Organizational News (28)
- Paternal Rights (54)
- Paternity Fraud (24)
- Propaganda Exposed (190)
- Religion (3)
- Shared Parenting (21)
- Social-Destruction Enterprise (69)
- Suicides (11)
- The New World Order (195)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Web Statistics (3)
- Women's Violence (250)
- November 5, 2009: Praising gender inequity raises feminist ire
- October 14, 2009: Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice
- October 10, 2009: A "fare-well" of sorts
- July 23, 2009: Dad & Things blog-updates back in operation
- June 23, 2009: Toddler's hands dunked into boiling water
- June 10, 2009: Sexual Orientation -- Nature or Nurture?
- June 7, 2009: Fred says...
- May 30, 2009: Why Did Feminists Attack The Family?
- May 12, 2009: Roadkillradio.com
- May 5, 2009: The economic down-turn and Canada
Blogroll
Help Lines for Men
Men's and Family Rights Organizations
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Archive for the Men's Issues Category
Praising gender inequity raises feminist ire
November 5, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
Student won’t be punished for satirical posters
A University of Alberta student [of women’s studies] whose satirical posters had him facing probation or expulsion learned Wednesday he won’t be punished after all.
Derek Warwick, a fourth-year women’s studies student, said the posters were supposed to be a humorous way to get people talking about comments from the university president about a decline in male enrolment. (Full Story and comments)
Posted in Censorship, Education, Men's Issues, Feminism | Print | No Comments »
A “fare-well” of sorts
October 10, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
This blog entry is intended only for the serious reader and student of human history and evolution. Do not bother to read the rest of this entry if you do not like reading or if you merely seek judicial solutions to the damages caused by your divorce and child-custody issues.
Almost three months have gone by since I last posted an entry to dads & things, the blog of the popular website of Fathers for Life. Related to that, I also reduced the frequency of postings to the mailing list of Fathers for Life.
To keep up the frequency of the postings and updates, at the levels to which people had become accustomed to, as well as staying on top of the hundreds of e-mail messages that arrived daily in our inbox, required between 16 to 20 hours of work each day. Obviously and ultimately, that was more than I could cope with.
Little harm is done by me not answering requests for help and information. Virtually all of the answers I can give are available at the website of Fathers for Life. Surely, anyone who seeks answers can find them at that website. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and so, as the home page of that website clearly states, is Fathers for Life. No one expects to be led by the hand to explore Wikipedia….
If anyone wishes to get in touch with me, I still answer my telephone. People frequently do get in touch by phone. I gladly sit down at my PC to illustrate to them how to navigate the website of Fathers for Life, explaining to them over the phone which links to follow, while I also offer some common-sense advice to those who appear to be in need of it.
That sort of help is much more and better than what was available to me when I went through my separation and divorce, close to 35 years ago — when it took me about six months to find out that there was an organization in Edmonton that could or should have helped to provide some of the answers I sought but did not, even after I found it.
All of that does not mean that my life stopped. I still seek answers. The serious heart attack I experienced in February 2009 was a warning that I had to slow down. I slowed down but did not entirely stop my efforts to find and understand the driving forces of the motivations for the planned destruction of the family within the context of the program for the re-engineering of humanity, of all of civilization, that is.
Quite some years ago, I posted an on-line edition of a book to Fathers for Life, The Head of the Medusa. by Perseus. The book was read by few fathers-rights activists, even then, and is being read by virtually no fathers-rights activists now. Yet, the book clearly identifies the forces that drive the planned destruction of the family within the context of the systematic re-engineering of humanity.
The Trinity of Humanicide — the destruction of the existing form of the human race — is formed by combining three such isms and let’s be honest, didn’t they all sound good when we first heard them? Let’s rip off the shining raiment and see what lies underneath.
- Environmentalism — the war between people and the planet.
- Multiculturalism — the war between the world and its component nations.
- Feminism — the war between the two component human genders.
Unmasked, we can see these three imposters for what they are. They are not a Trinity to bring us together at all. They are three weird sisters met to tear us apart and create disharmony and destruction.
Here we have a witches brew, an all encompassing global ‘ethic’ that is the most powerful mechanism for human destruction in the history of the world. Anyone who cannot see, or understand this — and that is the vast majority of us — must believe that the three components of this spell are basically benign, altruistic aims. But, we have been fooled into biting into a poisoned apple. That is the true heart of this terrible human catastrophe.
In our lack of vision and understanding, we have ourselves become components in the most toxic and most powerful force for evil that has ever been unleashed in the history of human existence.
– The Toxic Trinity of Humanicide, by Perseus
A few days ago I ran across a statement that, with very few words, sums up the fundamental, primary problem cause for what Perseus addressed in The Head of the Medusa, “Communists are socialists who are in a hurry”.
Communism is socialism, but whether socialism is being put into place through a bloody revolution or through a slow death of a thousand cuts, once socialism is in place, whether its implementation took a hundred years or more or just a couple of years, it will have the nature of a centralized, totalitarian regime.
The Socialist Phenomenon, by Igor Shafarevich (English edition 1980, with a foreword by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, and now accessible in full and for free at the indicated link) is required reading.
I came across that book as a result of reading Solzhenitsyn’s 1978 Commencement Address at Harvard. He stated in that,
….The mathematician Igor Shafarevich, a member of the Soviet Academy of Science, has written a brilliantly argued book entitled Socialism; this is a penetrating historical analysis demonstrating that socialism of any type and shade leads to a total destruction of the human spirit and to a leveling of mankind into death. Shafarevich’s book was published in France almost two years ago [1976, in Russian] and so far no one has been found to refute it.
Igor Shafarevich is a world-renowned mathematician. I read substantial portions of his book [2008 12 02 — all of it by now], and I must fully agree with what Solzhenitsyn stated about it.
Solzhenitsyn did not mention feminism as a form of socialism, and neither did Shafarevich in his book, where feminism is not mentioned at all. Perhaps neither author deemed it necessary to state the obvious, namely that socialism favours the female of the human species as much as anthills and beehives favour the females of their respective insect species. That favoritism is illusory, as it means nothing more than that females do all of the work, and males serve only a single purpose, to diversify the gene pool….(Full Story: Search-engine censorship, socialism, ant hills and female supremacy)
The Socialist Phenomenon makes for chilling reading and is without a doubt true. It is even more chilling to consider the extent of censorship that is at work in the West, given that it took a world-renowned mathematician during the existence of the former USSR to provide a clear and concise summary of the pertinent issues, while no one in the West, not even the Pope, did anything comparable. (–The Communist Manifesto, by Walter Schneider)
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn explained in his 1978 commencement address at Harvard that The Socialist Phenomenon,
is a penetrating historical analysis demonstrating that socialism of any type and shade leads to a total destruction of the human spirit and to a leveling of mankind into death.
Yes, socialism does that and nothing else. Igor Shafarevich hammers the point home by describing the four major aspects of socialism:
It would seem that socialist ideology has the ability to stamp widely separated or even historically unlinked socialist currents with indelible and stereotyped markings.
It seems to us quite legitimate to conclude that socialism does exist as a unified historical phenomenon. Its basic principles have been indicated above. They are:
- Abolition of private property.
- Abolition of the family.
- Abolition of religion.
- Equality, abolition of hierarchies in society.
The manifold embodiments of these principles are linked organically by a common spirit, by an identity of specific details and, frequently, by a clearly discernible overall thrust.
Our perspective on socialism takes into account only one of the dimensions in which this phenomenon unfolds. Socialism is not only an abstract ideological system but also the embodiment of that system in time and space. Therefore, having sketched in its outlines as an ideology, we now ought to be able to explain in what periods and within what civilization socialism arises, whether in the form of doctrine, popular movement or state structure. But here the answer turns out to be far less clear. While the ideology of socialism is sharply defined, the occurrence of socialism can hardly be linked to any definite time or civilization. If we consider the period in the history of mankind which followed the rise of the state as an institution, we find the manifestations of socialism, practically speaking, in all epochs and in all civilizations. It is possible, however, to identify epochs when socialist ideology manifests itself with particular intensity. This is usually at a turning point in history, a crisis such as the period of the Reformation or our own age. We could simply note that socialist states arise only in definite historical situations, or we could attempt to explain why it was that the socialist ideology appeared in virtually finished and complete form in Plato’s time. We shall return to these questions later. But in European history, we cannot point to a single period when socialist teachings were not extant in one form or another. It seems that socialism is a constant factor in human history, at least in the period following the rise of the state. Without attempting to evaluate it for the time being, we must recognize socialism as one of the most powerful and universal forces active in a field where history is played out.
Igor Shafarevich
The Socialist Phenomenon, p. 200_________
See also: Abolition of the family (at Fathers for Life)
Above, I mentioned that Igor Shafarevich’s The Socialist Phenomenon does not once mention feminism as an outcome or expression of socialism, but neither does it mention environmentalism. That brings me to the motivation for posting this commentary.
MUST READ: What happened to global warming?
By Paul Hudson, BBC Climate CorrespondentThis headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.
But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.
And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought [instead of “thought”, a better term would have been “falsely-alleged” –WHS] to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.
So what on Earth is going on? ….
And this:
From The Times (UK)
October 10, 2009
Power cuts forecast to hit UK in four years
Robin Pagnamenta, Energy Editor
Britain faces a return to 1970s-style power blackouts and disruption to its electricity supplies within four years, the energy regulator warned yesterday.
Ofgem raised the spectre of a return to the three-day week for British industry as the country scrambles to renovate its crumbling power infrastructure ahead of new EU pollution rules that will force the closure of a quarter of UK power stations by 2015….
That is environmentalism gone insane, and so are comparable efforts, wherever they are being undertaken, such as in the case of the Alberta Government intending to spend billions of dollars for Carbon Capture and Sequestration while it cuts back on health-care spending for seniors and the disabled. The reality of that sort of thing is that it is absolutely unnecessary, not only that but totally futile. There is no way that a reduction of man-made CO2 emissions, emissions that constitute no more than 3.6% of the total CO2 content of the global atmosphere, will have a noticeable impact on climate trends. The question is, what do power cuts and saving the globe have to do with the planned destruction of the family and with the abrogation of fathers rights?
Yes, I know. A few fathers-rights activists asked me that question over the years, but, although I gave them the answer to that question, few of those who asked that question ever accepted my answer. Well, if anyone still has a doubt as to whether environmentalism is part of the current program for implementing global socialism, consider how big a part of naziism environmentalism was.
Yes, naziism is a form of socialism. The term nazi is a nickname for the name of the party that promoted that particular form of socialism, the National-Socialist German Workers Party (the acronym for the nazi party, NSDAP, stands for Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiter Partei, that is, the National-Socialist German Workers Party –WHS). If you have any misgivings about the fact that environmentalism was strongly intertwined with Hitler’s National Socialism, read
The Nazi-Enviro Connection: Uekoetter’s “Green and Brown” (2009), at Environmentalism is Fascism, by William Walter Kay
Considering the global attempts under the auspices of the UN to implement international income and asset equalization between have- and have-not nations (true to the communist maxim, “from those who have to those in need”) at any cost, in the order of many trillions of dollars, the income and asset transfers from men to women in the name of women’s rights pale by comparison, and so does the accompanying extent of the human misery, suffering and deaths so created through the planned destruction of the family.
The third member of the Toxic Trinity of Humanicide, multiculturalism, will be covered in another commentary that I will, if time permits, post a few months or so from now.
For now, if we cannot stop the insanity of extremely expensive but totally futile, humanly and economically damaging efforts to implement climate control for the sake of environmentalism in the name of saving the globe, what makes anyone think that the ongoing planned destruction of the family can be stopped? The same organizations and ultra-wealthy individuals who fund and promote “climate control” also fund and control the planned destruction of the family, with the goal of reducing the world population to about 350 million to a billion people. After all, they consider humanity to be a cancer on the face of the Earth.
If you have not yet caught on to the strong connection between environmentalism and feminism, then consider to what extent you, too, have become indoctrinated:
The function of propaganda does not lie in the scientific training of the individual, but in calling the masses’ attention to certain facts, processes, necessities, etc., whose significance is thus for the first time placed within their field of vision. …
All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be. But if, as in propaganda for sticking out a war, the aim is to influence a whole people, we must avoid excessive intellectual demands on our public, and too much caution cannot be extended in this direction. …
The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan….
The function of propaganda is, for example, not to weigh and ponder the rights of different people, but exclusively to emphasize the one right which it has set out to argue for. Its task is not to make an objective study of the truth, in so far as it favors the enemy, and then set it before the masses with academic fairness; its task is to serve our own right, always and unflinchingly.
—Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter VI
Walter Schneider
Posted in Social-Destruction Enterprise, Media Bias, Civil Rights, Religion, Economy, Education, Divorce, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, Family, Men's Issues, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »
Why Did Feminists Attack The Family?
May 30, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
Definitely worth reading
From the blog Heretical Sex
Monday, August 27, 2007
Why Did Feminists Attack the Family?
The contemporary cultural and political war against the family has several causes, of which feminism is by far the most significant.
‘First-wave’ feminists in the early Twentieth Century were not at all anti-family. Indeed, one of their demands was that control of hearth and home should be the domain of women. Reference.
It was only as a result of second-wave feminism, in the late 1960s, that the feminist attack on the family began. Neil Lyndon, in his 1992 book ‘No More Sex War’, was perhaps the first to trace the origins of second-wave feminist ideology to Marxism….(Full Story)
Posted in Divorce, Civil Rights, Men's Issues, Family, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »
Roadkillradio.com
May 12, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
FYI,
Here is the chance you were always waiting for, a chance to have your say in public!
RoadkillRadio.com is worth listening to (Tuesdays, PST 7:30 to 9:30 p.m.) and even worth promoting.
Home Page: RoadkillRadio.com
Quoted from that web page:
NOTE: We only Broadcast “LIVE…” on Tuesdays, starting approximately 30 minutes before showtime! If its not Tuesday, you will not get a live stream. The archived shows however, will stream. All archived audio on the web site is of the MP3 file format.
Archived Shows
All shows [a large and interesting list — WHS] are available for mp3 downloadFor example:
There will be time for some open-line then an eye-opening, in-depth discussion on Fathers Rights and the Rights of Children.
Vancouver lawyer and well-known advocate Carey Linde will be joining us to talk about this issue and parental alienation. Are the courts getting it wrong? (Note: The first third of that portion of the show deals with provincial politics in B.C.. Skip that to get to the interview with Carey Linde. The discussion of fathers rights, feminist judicial bias, divorce issues such as parental alienation and much more is fascinating. It is very important for anyone living in B.C. that the discussion contains a recommendation by Carey Linde to copy the results of the poll on shared parenting run by Saskatchewan MP Vellacotte and to forward that to the B.C. Attorney General — in view of the currently going-on revisions to family rights laws in B.C.. –WHS)
From the home page:
Important and Informative! Joins US!!
Broadcasting Live from Vancouver Canada
Unabashedly Canadian, BOLD, No Apologies!
Join Kari Simpson and Terry O’Neill as they expose and examine
the issues that affect your family, rights and liberties.This Hard-Hitting current events online show dares to be
politically-incorrect and invites all those who have been silenced to be heard!!
May 12th 2009 - 7:30 p.m. - We ran out of time last week, so as promised you will hear a tape recording of a meeting (held on April 29, 2009) between RKR’s very own Kari Simpson, social workers and the parents of three children who are being “investigated” by these so-called child protection workers. Listen as social workers REFUSE to have the meeting taped for accuracy
(click here for an advanced listen part 1).Then you will hear how they REFUSED to provide the findings of their investigation in writing!!!! (click hear for an advanced listen part 2)
For the rest of the show it is all about the BC Election!! Joining us in-studio will be pollster Glen Robbins from SceResearch and our own, politically in-the-know commentator Ron Gray. Former B.C. Premier Bill VanderZalm will be here and we will talk to candidates as their political fates are decided by BC VOTERS!!!!
We will be taking your calls and emails! This is a must listen… a must tell your friends and family to listen to… RoadKill Radio Rumble!
CALL IN: On-air telephone: (604) 525-4167
Important and Informative!
Your Calls, Your Thoughts, Your Opinions are welcome!
EMAIL THE SHOW LIVE: Roadkillradio@live.ca
WHERE: Listen live - http://www.roadkillradio.com
–Walter
http://fathersforlife.org
http://blog.fathersforlife.org
Posted in Social-Destruction Enterprise, Media Bias, Education, Paternal Rights, Civil Rights, Economy, Child Support, Judiciary, Divorce, Health, Feminist Jurisprudence, Feminism, Propaganda Exposed, Family, Gay issues, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »
The economic down-turn and Canada
May 5, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
By Allan Chinnery
It is now official that Canada is in a depression as deep as any that it had been in before. The Bank of Canada interest rate at 0.25% tells you that they are scared —-less and see no solution to the problem. However there is a bigger problem.
The smart money, that of judges and lawyers was invested offshore because with Canadas judiciary it is not safe to keep it in Canada. Such investments lost much of their equity when the banks started going down. Most notable of interest to members of the Canadian Bar Association would have been UBS and the British banks.
Oh well, that is the nature of the investment game and it had a better chance of survivng there than being raided by Canada’s judges and tax department. But it is high time Canada came up with a stimulus package for Canada’s divorce industry.
There are rumors floating around among the women of Canada that just stamping their pretty little feet does not add to the national product or in anyway raise the standard of living for Canadians. What is worse, a few way-out-there females are actually saying it might be possible that Mr. Judge stomping his $400 dollar shoes and blustering about the power of his prison gangs will not produce wealth for anyone in Canada.
These terrible and seditious rumors have caused a serious slowdown in the divorce industry making it almost impossible for the afore-mentioned investors to recoup their losses. It has been said that there are women in Canada that are working in and outside of the home, maintaining their credit ratings, being financially responsible. I even heard of one who, for the good of her family, was driving a 5 year old car.
No wonder the auto industry is broken. As you can see these untruths about how money is made are destroying the whole economy and are putting the judiciary’s credibility and powers into disrepute.
Stevie and the boys should immediately hold a secret meeting on how to infuse millions of dollars into the domestic violence sector to get these heretical ideas from the minds of Canadian women. Failure to do this will undermine the power of judges blustering and foot stomping as well as perhaps resulting in calluses on the hands of members of the Law Society.
Such things will destroy the Canada that we have known for the last 20 years as it will fall backward in time to a place requiring effort not effect.
____________
Allan Chinnery is an expunged, squeezed-dry father who survives by working as a gardener for about ten to 15 hours a week.
Posted in Child Support, Economy, Judiciary, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Men and Women Work, Men's Issues | Print | No Comments »
Why Men Earn More
April 9, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
The pay gap between what men and women earn continues to be in the news. New legislation that aims at eliminating that pay gap is constantly and repeatedly being put into force. Yet, as Warren Farrell explained in a 2005 speech at the Cato Institute, there are very good reasons for the pay gap.
The pay gap, where it exists, is due to women’s choices. On the other hand, when women work just as men do — never marry, don’t have children, work in risky, stressful jobs, as many hours as never-married, childless men work at those jobs — women not only earn equal pay, they earn more than their male counterparts do, more by a considerable margin.
If you are interested in that issue and its causes, watch the video clips identified by the following.
mensnewsdaily.com
Apr 8, 2009Why Men Earn More
By Bernard Chapin
What follows is a series of video segments from Dr. Warren Farrell’s 2005 speech at the Cato Institute entitled “Why Men Earn More.” I thank Argus Eyes for posting this last fall. A reader reminded me of it the other day. I was not yet writing the daily blog at the time in which it was originally published so I could not link back to it. By the way, if you’re not familiar with Argus Eyes check out some of his other videos and don’t forget to subscribe if you like him. He’s a fine fellow. Here’s Part I: (Full Story)
Posted in Civil Rights, Economy, Men and Women Work, Men's Issues, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, Propaganda Exposed | Print | No Comments »
Help for Battered Men
April 5, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
The following contains a good and comprehensive collection of information and resources for men who are battered by their wives or girlfriends. Unfortunately, the web page from which the information is quoted here does not indicate whether the sponsoring organization is still in operation.
That does not mean that the crisis of bettered men does not exist.
![]()

http://www.batteredmen.com/bathelpintro.htm
Help for Battered Men
Battered Man?
Here’s What You Can Do
Resources for Battered Men
- Are You Battered or Abused?
- Why Men Don’t Do Anything About It
- What You Can Do
- Washington Centers that Serve Men
- Other Centers that Serve Men
- On-line Help and Support
- On-line Pamphlet—Print it out and pass it around!
What can you do? Talk about it. Too often, men feel a “double shame,” the shame that a battered woman feels, and the “man’s shame” of being beaten up by a woman and being mocked or laughed at for it. Don’t wait until she cuts you open with a kitchen knife. If she’s unreasonably jealous or controlling, if she’s a “control freak,” if she slaps you around or throws things, if she starts to destroy things that are personally important to you, don’t ignore the signs! It’s not going to get any better! Watch out for your own safety!
(Full Story )
_______________
Note by F4L: The advice offered at that web page includes little, if anything, on what a battered man who is a father may be able to do to protect his children from a violent mother.
As far as intimate partner violence goes, men and women commit such violence in equal proportions, with many researchers identifying that women are violent even slightly more often than men are.
REFERENCES EXAMINING ASSAULTS BY WOMEN ON THEIR SPOUSES OR MALE PARTNERS:
AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Martin S. Fiebert
Department of Psychology
California State University, Long Beach
Last updated: September 2008SUMMARY: This bibliography examines 246 scholarly investigations: 187 empirical studies and 59 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 237,750.
The difference between perceptions of the frequency of female violence, such as expressed in the opinions by feminist propagandists and advocacy researchers, and the study reports examined by Prof. Martin Fiebert constitutes the extent of pro-female and anti-male bias held by officials who ignore the scientific evidence of intimate partner violence.
When it comes to violence against weaker and younger victims, women undoubtedly predominate, by far, as the perpetrators of serious and fatal violence against children in families.
In view of those circumstances, it is without a doubt necessary to have as many shelters or refuges for battered men as we have for battered women. However, the decades-long feminist crusade that paints women as victims and men as violent beasts has preempted that option.
As a result of that, there are no shelters for battered men in Canada and virtually none in any of the other developed nations. There are most definitely no shelters for battered men and their children that permit children and their fathers at risk to find safety from violent mothers and wives.
Posted in Health, Men's Issues, Family, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »
Children harmed by sole custody, report says
April 5, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
The Toronto Star
3 April 2009
Children harmed by sole custody, report says
Canadian judges rarely use voluntary arrangements in which kids live with each parent roughly equally
By Susan Pigg, Living Reporter
Family court judges are misguidedly harming children by granting sole custody to one parent - usually the mother - in bitter divorce battles, says a comprehensive new report.[*]
Too many children are being “robbed of the love of one parent” by a legal system that is out of touch with the needs of children and treats them like property to be won or lost, says Edward Kruk, an expert on child custody issues….(Full Story)
__________________
* Note by F4L:
The report by Edward Kruk, Ph.D.:
- Shared Parenting: Child Custody, Access, and Parental Responsibility
- More information by Edward Kruk at Fathers for Life
Posted in Divorce, Paternal Rights, Civil Rights, Health, Men's Issues, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, Child-Custody Awards, Propaganda Exposed | Print | No Comments »
An unmarried husband: Unwelcome reality
April 4, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
The Free Lance-Star
March 29, 2009 1:14 am
AN UNMARRIED HUSBAND:UNWELCOME REALITY
By Stephen Baskerville
–The decline of the family now affects virtually every American and seriously threatens not only social order but freedom and constitutional government. G.K. Chesterton once observed that the family checks government power. He was writing about divorce: Despite other threats to the family, divorce remains the most serious.
Americans would be shocked if they knew what goes on in the name of divorce. Divorce today licenses unprecedented government intrusion, including the power to seize children, loot family savings, and incarcerate parents without trial.
The full implications of the “no-fault” revolution have never been publicly debated. Divorce today seldom involves two people simply parting ways; 80 percent of divorces are unilateral. Under “no-fault,” divorce becomes a power grab by one spouse, assisted by judicial officials who profit from the ensuing litigation: judges, lawyers, psychotherapists, and social workers. Involuntary divorce involves government agents forcibly removing innocent people from their homes, seizing their property, and separating them from their children. It requires long-term supervision over private life by state functionaries, including police and jails….(Full Story)
Posted in Divorce, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Paternal Rights, Civil Rights, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, Propaganda Exposed, Feminist Jurisprudence, Family, The New World Order | Print | 1 Comment »
Using kids as weapons
April 2, 2009 by Walter Schneider.
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: [Mention] Parental Alienation: Using kids as weapons (Barbara Kay)
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:11:28 +1100
Quote: Critics of PAS fret that the syndrome is being exploited by abusive parents as a ploy to enforce visitation or custody of justifiably resistant children. However, abused children present a notably different affect from the alienated. An abused child is reluctant to discuss what has been done to him and must be coaxed to reveal his secret. Even then, he doesn’t express hatred of the abusing parent, as he longs for a healed relationship. By contrast, a PAS child exhibits classic symptoms of brainwashing, acting in robotic alignment with the alienator.
The National Post (Canada)
1 April 2009
Using kids as weapons
By Barbara Kay <bkay@videotron.
Last weekend, I attended the Canadian Symposium for Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), Canada’s first international conference on a form of child abuse that can be as bad as, or even worse than, sexual and physical abuse….(Full Story)
______________
More PAS information at Fathers for Life.
Posted in Men's Issues | Print | No Comments »
