You are currently browsing the archives for the Maternal Rights category.
- Abortion (34)
- Anorexia Nervosa (6)
- Books (1)
- Censorship (33)
- Child Abduction (20)
- Child Murder (58)
- Child Support (9)
- Child-Custody Awards (59)
- Civil Rights (83)
- Divorce (86)
- Economy (6)
- Education (63)
- Family (208)
- Feminism (142)
- Feminist Jurisprudence (137)
- Gay issues (27)
- Health (84)
- Judiciary (39)
- Maternal Rights (3)
- Media Bias (59)
- Men and Women Work (40)
- Men's Issues (241)
- Organizational News (29)
- Parental Alienation (1)
- Paternal Rights (61)
- Paternity Fraud (24)
- Propaganda Exposed (197)
- Religion (3)
- Shared Parenting (22)
- Social-Destruction Enterprise (73)
- Suicides (12)
- The New World Order (201)
- Tips and Notes (3)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Web Statistics (3)
- Women's Violence (256)
- September 6, 2010: Don't Marry!?
- September 6, 2010: Chief Family Court Judge on Bondage Website
- September 4, 2010: Carey Roberts on Domestic Violence (US)
- September 4, 2010: New Brazilian Law: Parental Alienation is Child Abuse
- September 3, 2010: Judge dismisses Lloyd EPO
- September 3, 2010: Women claim tribes won't enforce child support
- September 3, 2010: What about mothers for life?
- September 2, 2010: The state of the education system
- August 31, 2010: Another million dollars for women
- August 31, 2010: Tips and Notes
Blogroll
- Angry Harry
- Canada Free Press
- Dictionary for Dads
- Fathers for Life
- Le Blogue de GERARD
- Marty Nemko's Men's Issues
- Mensactivism.org
- P.A.R.E.N.T. International
- roadkillradio.com
- Robert Whiston
- Stephen Baskerville
- The Rights of Man (UK)
- Today's Family News
- UK Centre for Crime and Justice Studies
- William Gairdner
Help Lines for Men
Men's and Family Rights Organizations
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Archive for the Maternal Rights Category
Judge dismisses Lloyd EPO
September 3, 2010 by Walter Schneider.
Judge dismisses Lloyd emergency protective order (EPO), due to the ex-wife having made false allegations, but as of now no decision has been made as to which of the two parents will have custody of the child at the core of the dispute. That, according to the judge in Fleming County District Court, is up to the circuit court to decide.
The Ledger Independent
2 September 2010
Judge dismisses Lloyd EPO
By Misty Maynard, Staff Writer Ledger Independent
FLEMINGSBURG - Questions concerning custody of a daughter linger, but an emergency protective order secured by Fleming County Hospital Chief Executive Officer Davie Lloyd against ex-husband Brett Lloyd was dismissed during a hearing Thursday in Fleming County District Court….
During the EPO hearing, Hill pressed the judge for a ruling as to whether Brett Lloyd could secure the child, citing an order from the Montana First Judicial District Court that amended the parenting plan established at the time of the couple’s divorce. However, Probst said the issue of custody should be addressed in circuit court.
“Where it goes, I don’t control,” he said.
The original parenting plan established in 2004 allowed Brett Lloyd visitation every other weekend and for two weeks in the summer, as well as on alternating holidays. The new parenting plan, based on the new Montana ruling, established that the child should reside with Brett Lloyd, “subject to Davie’s parenting time, which shall be supervised and in the state of Montana.”
The new plan requires Davie Lloyd to have supervision during visitation because she “deliberately and maliciously” interfered with her ex-husband’s parental rights.
“Further, Davie is considered a ‘flight risk,’ having moved the minor child from one state to another and refusing to inform Brett of her physical location,” according to the plan….(Full Story)
Posted in Judiciary, Maternal Rights, Paternal Rights, Shared Parenting, Child Abduction, Child-Custody Awards, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »
Women claim tribes won’t enforce child support
September 3, 2010 by Walter Schneider.
Capitol Weekly (U.S.A.)
2 September 2010
Women claim tribes won’t enforce child support
By Malcolm Maclachlan
When Christina Brown got together with her soon-to-be ex-husband in the early 1990s, they were poor. But he’s a member of the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians. When the tribe’s casino opened up a few years later, the checks started rolling in, around $20,000 a month. They moved out of their mobile home into a big house. Nice cars and a 34-foot Fleetwood motor home followed.
After what she described as a worsening domestic situation, she left him in 2007. Brown, who noted that she once had a drug problem, said she’s been clean for years now.
But in other ways, her present looks a lot like her past. She’s on welfare and food stamps, living with her mother in a two-bedroom house, and running four payments behind on her car.
And there’s another crucial difference: she’s responsible for the children. She has five over all — one before her husband, three with him and one after. The three youngest live with her, including two from her husband, but she says he hasn’t paid child support in years, despite the fact that he still gets thousands of dollars a month from the tribe.
“The court ordered him to make all these payments,” Brown said. “But I couldn’t garnish them.”….
“I didn’t mean for it to happen this way,” Brown said. “Trust me. I would have never had kids if I knew I was going to go this way. I would have gone straight education.”….(Full Story)
__________
Given that being a welfare mom as a career choice did not work out well for Christina Brown, why does she not just give custody of her children to their respective fathers? It looks as if at least two of her children would certainly be substantially better off.
She can then still pursue a career in education. She is still young enough for that. People have done it when they were in their seventies. Perhaps it will not even cost her a dime to do so if things are similar to the way they are in Canada in that respect. Status natives in Canada can obtain university degrees for free, with the government footing the bill. They will not be required to run up the sometimes horrendous debts in doing so that normal mortals must labour under.
Mind you, it takes work to obtain a degree, and then it takes more work to earn a living, but, if the “government” pays for the degree, why not? It is good for the self-esteem.
Posted in Child Support, Maternal Rights, Paternal Rights, Men and Women Work, Child-Custody Awards, Men's Issues, Family | Print | No Comments »
Mother sues son she abandoned
July 25, 2010 by Walter Schneider.
This is outrageous!
Mother sues son she abandoned
B.C. woman, 71, seeks support from children under archaic statute
The Edmonton Journal
When Ken Anderson was just 15, his mother, Shirley, made it clear: She didn’t want him anymore.
Ken’s father, a long-haul trucker, had been transferred from Osoyoos, B.C., to the province’s Kootenay region. Although their marriage was rocky, Shirley followed, taking her second-youngest son, Darryl, with her.
Ken was left behind.
Ken had plenty of time to think about it as he wiped bug splatter off car windshields and pumped gas, lucky to pick up some shifts at the local gas station to make a buck….
The way he sees it, he never really had a mother.
On Aug. 3 and 4, Ken, now 46, will face off in B.C. Supreme Court against the woman who gave birth to him.
Shirley Anderson, now 71, is suing Ken and four of his five siblings for parental support. The case dragged on for years, but the August hearing should complete it….
Posted in Maternal Rights, Feminist Jurisprudence | Print | 3 Comments »