October 14, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

Veritas Publishing I N T R O D U C E S

Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice

The book addresses a serious problem, the need for court reform and the abolishment of judicial and quasi-judicial immunity. Marinated with the makings of sizzle, the book is f illed with the courts’ tricks and traps for the unwary—to alert the readers both why their law cases failed and what must be done to effect court reform.  E ach chapter introduces the background of the subject of that chapter and then presents a series of illustrative anecdotes intended to teach the readers by example how to avoid those court tricks and traps people are likely to encounter in their existing or potential court cases.

Its author, Barbara C. Johnson, an unconventional 74-year-old, has long been a fierce advocate for fathers’ rights in family courts.  She is an outspoken critic of the Massachusetts court system, which she says is rife with corruption.

In 2002, she ran a quixotic campaign for governor, campaigning in an antique fire truck and promising to use creativity, compassion, and a willingness to listen to the People to mend an ailing government.

In 2006, Johnson was barred from practicing law in Massachusetts. “The disbarment by a kangaroo court was an effort to silence my criticism of the courts,” she said.

A newspaper wrote, “While we don’t fully agree with either her politics or her methods, Johnson is a character in a humdrum world sorely in need of more characters.  She’s the t horn in the side, the thumbtack on the chair. . . . Johnson speaks her mind, and loudly.”

Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice is available for purchase on

• http://www.Amazon.com
• http://www.Abebooks.com
• http://www.Alibris.com
• http://www.BookSurge.com (eventually) and shortly thereafter the book’s listing will appear on
• http://www.BooksinPrint.com and
• http://www.GlobalBooksinPrint.com

Please forward this announcement to everyone who you believe would be interested.  Thank you.

Read the customer reviews as they come in after publication and/or write your own review!

Click to sign up, if you want to receive other emails from Veritas Publishing.

Posted in Books, Judiciary, Civil Rights, Feminist Jurisprudence | Print | No Comments »

June 23, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

CNews

June 18, 2009

Woman burns toddler, gets house arrest

By TOM BRODBECK

WINNIPEG — An Ontario judge has handed down one of the most egregious sentences I’ve seen in a long time to a woman who forced a toddler’s hands into a pot of boiling water, causing fourth-degree burns.

For that, Superior Court Justice Helen MacLeod-Beliveau is the latest winner of the Eight-Ball Award, handed out in this column to highlight some of the worst perversions of justice in our [Canadian] court system….(Full Story)

Note by F4L: CNews got the date of the crime wrong in the article.  The crime against the little boy took place in 2007, not in 1997; but the following identifies an additional article about the case.

The IntelligencerJune 17, 2009

Mom seeking justice for child victims

Posted By Jeremy Ashley

At times, Damon Reddom Stone is a haunted four-year-old.

Sitting on his mother’s lap Monday, he ran his hands over her fingertips.

“He said, ‘Mommy, I wish I had normal hands like you,’” recalled Tina Reddom this week.

Every so often, she said, her youngster’s mind drifts back to the morning of Oct. 16, 2007 when a 24-year-old city woman — in a fit of supposed rage — forced his tiny hands into a pot of boiling water in the Applewood Drive apartment she shared with her then-boyfriend, Damon’s father.

Damon, who was two at the time, sustained serious burns and will require several surgeries, skin grafts and therapy to treat the wounds….(Full Story)

Posted in Judiciary, Feminist Jurisprudence, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

May 12, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

FYI,

Here is the chance you were always waiting for, a chance to have your say in public!

RoadkillRadio.com is worth listening to (Tuesdays, PST 7:30 to 9:30 p.m.) and even worth promoting.

Home Page: RoadkillRadio.com

Listen live:

Quoted from that web page:

NOTE: We only Broadcast “LIVE…” on Tuesdays, starting approximately 30 minutes before showtime! If its not Tuesday, you will not get a live stream. The archived shows however, will stream. All archived audio on the web site is of the MP3 file format.

Archived shows:

Archived Shows
All shows [a large and interesting list — WHS] are available for mp3 download

For example:

Download Show 8 Part Two

There will be time for some open-line then an eye-opening, in-depth discussion on Fathers Rights and the Rights of Children.  Vancouver lawyer and well-known advocate Carey Linde will be joining us to talk about this issue and parental alienation.  Are the courts getting it wrong?  (Note: The first third of that portion of the show deals with provincial politics in B.C..  Skip that to get to the interview with Carey Linde.  The discussion of fathers rights, feminist judicial bias, divorce issues such as parental alienation and much more is fascinating.  It is very important for anyone living in B.C. that the discussion contains a recommendation by Carey Linde to copy the results of the poll on shared parenting run by Saskatchewan MP Vellacotte and to forward that to the B.C. Attorney General — in view of the currently going-on revisions to family rights laws in B.C.. –WHS)

From the home page:

Important and Informative! Joins US!!

Broadcasting Live from Vancouver Canada
Unabashedly Canadian, BOLD, No Apologies!
Join Kari Simpson and Terry O’Neill as they expose and examine
the issues that affect your family, rights and liberties.

This Hard-Hitting current events online show dares to be
politically-incorrect and invites all those who have been silenced to be heard!!

May 12th 2009 - 7:30 p.m. - We ran out of time last week, so as promised you will hear a tape recording of a meeting (held on April 29, 2009) between RKR’s very own Kari Simpson, social workers and the parents of three children who are being “investigated” by these so-called child protection workers. Listen as social workers REFUSE to have the meeting taped for accuracy
(click here for an advanced listen part 1).

Then you will hear how they REFUSED to provide the findings of their investigation in writing!!!! (click hear for an advanced listen part 2)

For the rest of the show it is all about the BC Election!! Joining us in-studio will be pollster Glen Robbins from SceResearch and our own, politically in-the-know commentator Ron Gray. Former B.C. Premier Bill VanderZalm will be here and we will talk to candidates as their political fates are decided by BC VOTERS!!!!

We will be taking your calls and emails! This is a must listen… a must tell your friends and family to listen to… RoadKill Radio Rumble!

CALL IN: On-air telephone: (604) 525-4167

Important and Informative!

Your Calls, Your Thoughts, Your Opinions are welcome!

EMAIL THE SHOW LIVE: Roadkillradio@live.ca

WHERE: Listen live - http://www.roadkillradio.com

–Walter

http://fathersforlife.org
http://blog.fathersforlife.org

Posted in Social-Destruction Enterprise, Media Bias, Education, Paternal Rights, Civil Rights, Economy, Child Support, Judiciary, Divorce, Health, Feminist Jurisprudence, Feminism, Propaganda Exposed, Family, Gay issues, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

May 5, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

By Allan Chinnery

It is now official that Canada is in a depression as deep as any that it had been in before.  The Bank of Canada interest rate at 0.25% tells you that they are scared —-less and see no solution to the problem.  However there is a bigger problem.

The smart money, that of judges and lawyers was invested offshore because with Canadas judiciary it is not safe to keep it in Canada.  Such investments lost much of their equity when the banks started going down.  Most notable of interest to members of the Canadian Bar Association would have been UBS and the British banks.

Oh well, that is the nature of the investment game and it had a better chance of survivng there than being raided by Canada’s judges and tax department.  But it is high time Canada came up with a stimulus package for Canada’s divorce industry.

There are rumors floating around among the women of Canada that just stamping their pretty little feet does not add to the national product or in anyway raise the standard of living for Canadians.  What is worse, a few way-out-there females are actually saying it might be possible that Mr. Judge stomping his $400 dollar shoes and blustering about the power of his prison gangs will not produce wealth for anyone in Canada.

These terrible and seditious rumors have caused a serious slowdown in the divorce industry making it almost impossible for the afore-mentioned investors to recoup their losses.  It has been said that there are women in Canada that are working in and outside of the home, maintaining their credit ratings, being financially responsible.  I even heard of one who, for the good of her family, was driving a 5 year old car.

No wonder the auto industry is broken.  As you can see these untruths about how money is made are destroying the whole economy and are putting the judiciary’s credibility and powers into disrepute.

Stevie and the boys should immediately hold a secret meeting on how to infuse millions of dollars into the domestic violence sector to get these heretical ideas from the minds of Canadian women.  Failure to do this will undermine the power of judges blustering and foot stomping as well as perhaps resulting in calluses on the hands of members of the Law Society.

Such things will destroy the Canada that we have known for the last 20 years as it will fall backward in time to a place requiring effort not effect.

____________
Allan Chinnery is an expunged, squeezed-dry father who survives by working as a gardener for about ten to 15 hours a week.

Posted in Child Support, Economy, Judiciary, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Men and Women Work, Men's Issues | Print | No Comments »

February 12, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

HELP IS NEEDED! [for a man and loving father who is a victim of an epidemic of rape hysteria in Ellsworth, Maine]

When you think it could not get any worse for a man and his children I assure you it can!

In the Bar Harbor area of Maine, a decent, loving, and dedicated father who decided to leave his 16 year relationship with his wife, and save their children from her mental insanity and physical abuse was charged and convicted on 2 counts of assault and 1 count of Gross Sexual Assault for allegedly splashing water in his wife’s face 3 years ago, for allegedly sexually assaulting his wife 2 years ago, and for allegedly pushing her on a chair 2 years ago.

There was NO evidence, NO investigation, and nothing more than an angry and coached wife’s testimony along with prosecutorial misconduct that resulted in a conviction.

During the trial no evidence or any mention was allowed of the wife’s history of false allegations against other men in her life, the use of restraining orders against the fathers of her children for custody, her psychiatric history, years of powerful medication use, the details of her outrageous and violent abuse of her partners and her children, or even the mention of her current divorce and custody battle with this man.

During the trial, the prosecutor violated this man’s basic Constitutional Rights when she told the jury that “there was no evidence that the sexual acts did not occur,” implying that a man was guilty unless he proved otherwise. Asst. DA prosecutor’s misconduct extended to making many inadmissible and prejudicial statements while stating statistics in her closing arguments in order to get a conviction and publicity regardless of the evidence, of the facts, or the truth in this case!

She even implied to the jury that no custody battle exists between the accuser and the accused.

During and after the trial, the defense attorney Motioned for Acquittal and a New Trial citing prosecutorial misconduct, inappropriate court rulings, and violations of this innocent man’s Constitutional Rights.

He [the man wrongly accused] is currently free on bail pending his sentencing in March 2009.

For the past 1 ½ years this innocent man has had custody of his two sons granted by the state of Maine while for almost 2 years his accuser has not been allowed contact with the children by Maine authorities.

If the conviction is not overturned and/or a new trial granted by March 5th, this innocent man could go to jail for 30 years while his two sons (12 and 3) will be taken by the State of Maine because their mother (the accuser) is considered a danger to them.

Please visit www.FillerFund.com for more details about this outrageous case, and PLEASE HELP!

Letters of support, donations, and legal help is DESPERATLY needed!

Posted in Judiciary, Civil Rights, Men's Issues, Feminist Jurisprudence | Print | No Comments »

February 12, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

Tampa Bay Online, Florida, USA

Feb 12, 9:13 AM EST

Pa. judges to enter plea in kickback scheme

SCRANTON, Pa. (AP) — Two Pennsylvania judges charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers are expected to plead guilty to fraud….(Full Story)

Posted in Judiciary | Print | No Comments »

February 6, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

Divorced father seeks equal protection
Custody challenge cites discriminatory decisions
Posted: January 28, 2009
10:09 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A case is developing in a Tennessee divorce dispute that one attorney believes could impact custody decisions nationwide because it calls down the authority of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to help fathers who are good parents and want to remain involved in their children’s lives….(Full Story)

Posted in Civil Rights, Judiciary, Paternal Rights, Shared Parenting, Feminist Jurisprudence, Child-Custody Awards, Women's Violence | Print | 5 Comments »

January 30, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

Telegraph.co.uk
29 Jan 2009

A Christian couple who say they felt forced into giving up their grandchildren for adoption said they would never have done so if they had known they would be placed with a homosexual couple.

By Auslan Cramb, Scottish Correspondent

They wanted to bring up the five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister in their own home but said they were forced to give them up by social workers who had concerns about the couple’s age and their health.

They spent two years involved in court cases over the children, whose 26-year-old mother is a recovering heroin addict, and finally agreed to adoption when they were faced with mounting legal bills….(Full Story)

Posted in Paternal Rights, Judiciary, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Child-Custody Awards, Gay issues, Family | Print | No Comments »

January 30, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

URGENT: 3-2-2009, Judicial Political Case of Persecution of Spanish Man

By A. Javier M. M

Ever since the year 2001, many men and women in Spain have been fighting against the Gender Agenda. Not one of them got a penny for their efforts.

One of those men lives in the Spanish city of Burgos.

He knows a lot of laws on the procedure of civil courts, because for over 30 years until now (Year 2008,) he has been working in a financial company as legal adviser.

He has fought against feminist groups that kidnaps children from their homes and take them to feminist bunkers [women’s shelters], not only without anyone’s permission but without any supervision from any court.

This has been happening in Burgos, a city in Spain, since 2004 .

Not one judge has ever answered to inquiries on this issue that Mr. Jesus Ayala is fighting for.

Today, tomorrow or at any time any children from the city of Burgos city and area could become victims of feminist kidnappers.

The fathers of the kidnapped children not only are not being asked, but if they assert their paternal rights they are liable to become prosecuted by the courts.

Laws on privacy of information have been contributing and aggravating factors.

The feminists who infest Spanish politics routinely publish in newspapers the names and the addresses of men who are only alleged by women to have committed crimes, but have not yet been proven guilty after a trial in court.

Mr. Jesus Ayala has taken action on this, based on the Spanish agency for private information protection, and he managed to obtain a decision from that agency that found the feminists are guilty and need to be penalized .

Another issue pursued by Mr. Jesus Ayala led him to expose the practice by the European Union to channel money transfers to the Spanish government so that their friends in Spanish women’s associations will receive it instead. Furthermore, it was found that those women associations take women into care without court orders, and that, in doing, they prevent the establishment of a proper audit trail.

When such a woman has denounced a man (signed a criminal charge against a man for gender violence), the association reward her by giving her money.

As soon as the woman signs before the police criminal charges against the man for gender violence (since 2001, psychological and “structural” violence - for instance, not giving her enough money for “her needs” - are included in our penal-code), only with that, without trial in any court, the Women’s Association of Spain grants her the status of victim.  On the strength of that she is then included in economic programs, economic subsidies, preferences to have cheaper houses specific for women, preference (over other women) to get a job, etc..

Obviously, she is also included in the statistics on abused women, and so, the women associations have more ground to request next year more money from the European Union.

The feminists cannot take Mr. Jesus Ayala out of the game through clean and honest methods.

So, back in the year of 2005, in the city of Valladolid, Spain, a women that holds a high position in the Spanish, feminist-dominated and controlled government administration (Mrs Rosa Valdeon Santiago, then in charge of Family Politics in
the local government of Burgos and Valladolid) said in a newspaper (Diario de Burgos, 13-7-2005) that “they would prosecute” all those men of  affiliated with “any specific [men’s] association…”, “for their activities.”

What happens next?

On 3-2-2009, Mr. Jesus Ayala will have to attend a trial on the City of Valladolid, following an accusation against him, launched not by any familiar, but by a fiscal (very close to a national political party, Partido Popular, an agency that has the power to manage a lot of money from European Union for women’s campaigns and gives it to friends that are affiliated with “women’s associations”), to declare Mr. Jesus Ayala legally incapacitated.

This is not happening in the Soviet Union, in 1950. No, this is happening here and now, in Spain, in the City of Valladolid.

I urge you to contact (please, be polite ) not only the Court of Valladolid, but also your representatives.

Greetings,

A. Javier M. M.
Study Group Fathers and Children
Madrid, Spain.

Contact the Court that will hold the trial of Jesus on 3-February-2009.
Phone: +34.983-22.81.01 , +34.983-22.81.02
Fax: +34.983-22.81.34.

(The international phone code prefix for Spain is 34)

_____________
F4L: Canada experienced similar attempts at persecuting those men whom the feminists designated to be guilty of hate crimes against feminists.  It is a modern witch hunt.  As of now, those attempts have not gone very far (see Canada’s declaration of war against pro-family- and pro-male activists). However, one Canadian Fathers Right activist sued over that and lost, even though the judge handing down that decision agreed that the FR activist had a case.

Although Canada’s system of democracy is being subverted (to progress more and more towards a system of socialist totalitarianism), things have not yet progressed as severely as they did in Spain in such a short time. Perhaps that is a misperception, as the trend here, having begun in the 1960’s, with Pierre Elliot Trudeau, then Canada’s Prime Minister, imposing the active promotion of feminism as Canada’s state-religion, was much more gradual and may well have reached (at least with respect to the progress of the implementation of the agenda for the planned destruction of the family) similar proportions as it did in Spain within about a decade.

Spain experiences a feminist revolution and take-over.  Ours is a more gradual subversion by feminism, environmentalism and multiculturalism.  Ultimately both our countries, as do all developed nations, will suffer identical fates.

Look for instance at President Obama’s declaration of the need for pay equity for women.  Women’s lower earnings exist primarily because they work on average about 20 percent fewer hours at lower-paying jobs, a matter of personal choices. (See Pay equity for women doesn’t exist?)  In reality, to pay women less than men are being paid for equal work done is a crime, by law.  Why would one wish to promote laws to enforce laws, if nothing other than to appear to be catering to women and thereby to consolidate one’s political power?

Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Antonio Gramsci must be laughing and dancing in their graves.

Posted in Social-Destruction Enterprise, Organizational News, Judiciary, Men's Issues, Family, The New World Order, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

January 29, 2009 by Walter Schneider.

Day of Rejoicing for the World of the Swiss Fathers Rights

Dear Reader,

Yesterday was a red-letter day for all fathers in Switzerland, and especially for separated or divorced fathers.

With the announcement of a proposed law for presumptive joint custody, the Swiss Federal Council approached a long-overdue gap in the law.

By including not-married parents, Switzerland goes even much farther than many neighboring countries.  Joint custody shall not only apply to married parents but also for those who are not married, as long as the father acknowledges paternity for a child.

The proposal by the Swiss Federal Council furthermore finally envisions clear consequences for those parents who torpedo visitation rights or even deny them.

The new Article 220 of the Swiss Criminal Code is slated to contain:

Article. 220

Who removes a minor from the of custody rights or refuses to return the minor,  who refuses to return a minor to the custody of the owner of custody rights, will, upon request, be punished with up to three years of incarceration or a fine.

Unmistakeable and clear - there is not much room left for maneuvering.

The fathers’ and parenting organizations are very proud on account of the interim target that has been reached.  We managed during the past years to sensitize the public and to draw its attention to the subject matter.  We are especially proud to have succeeded in convincing the leading professionals in the federal government administration that only a radical departure from the existing system will bring about a real improvement.

The present proposal shows that our words found an ear, and that fills us with pride and satisfaction.

However, nothing has yet been gained - this is only the first draft - there are yet many hurdles before us.

We will therefore continue to work - stick with it and convince the public, the politicians and leading professionals that only cooperation can in the end lead to the goal.
However, for today we may rejoice over what has been achieved.

Oliver Hunziker
Präsident GeCoBi
oliver.hunziker@gecobi.ch
www.gecobi.ch

The following contains the original, German-language text of that translation.

Freudentag für die schweizerische Väterszene

Liebe Leser,

Gestern war ein Freudentag für alle Väter in der Schweiz, insbesondere aber für die getrennt oder geschiedenen Väter.

Mit der Publikation des Gesetzesvorschlages für das gemeinsame Sorgerecht als Regelfall hat der Bundesrat eine längst überfällige Gesetzeslücke angegangen.

Mit dem Einbezug der unverheirateten Eltern geht die Schweiz sogar noch weiter als viele Nachbarländer. Neu soll nicht mehr nur für verheiratete Eltern das gemeinsame Sorgerecht gelten, sondern auch für unverheiratete, sofern der Vater das Kind anerkennt.

Der Vorschlag des Bundesrates sieht darüber hinaus endlich klare Konsequenzen für Elternteile vor, die das Besuchsrecht torpedieren oder gar verweigern.

Im neuen Artikel 220 des schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches soll stehen:

Art. 220
Wer eine minderjährige Person dem Inhaber des Obhutsrechts entzieht oder sich weigert, sie ihm zurückzugeben,
    wer sich weigert, eine minderjährige Person dem Inhaber eines Besuchsrechts zu übergeben,
wird, auf Antrag, mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder Geldstrafe bestraft.

Unmissverständlich und klar - da bleibt nicht viel Handlungsspielraum.

Die Väter- und Elternorganisationen sind sehr stolz auf das erreichte Zwischenziel. Es ist uns gelungen, in den letzten Jahren die Öffentlichkeit zu sensibilisieren und auf die Thematik aufmerksam zu machen. Und ganz besonders sind wir stolz, dass es uns gelungen ist, die massgeblichen Fachleute in der Bundesverwaltung davon zu überzeugen, dass nur eine radikale Abkehr vom bisherigen System eine wirkliche Verbesserung bringen kann.

Der vorliegende Entwurf zeigt, dass unsere Worte Gehör gefunden haben und das erfüllt uns mit Stolz und Befriedigung.

Doch noch ist nichts gewonnen - dies ist erst die Vernehmlassung - noch stehen viele Hürden vor uns.

Wir werden daher weiter arbeiten - dran bleiben und die Öffentlichkeit, die Politiker und die Fachleute davon überzeugen, dass nur ein Miteinander schlussendlich zum Ziel führen kann.

Aber für heute dürfen wir uns über das Erreichte freuen.

Oliver Hunziker
Präsident GeCoBi
oliver.hunziker@gecobi.ch
www.gecobi.ch

__________

Posted in Judiciary, Civil Rights, Paternal Rights, Child-Custody Awards | Print | 2 Comments »