May 15, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Although some time ago I had read a good portion of the article by Barbara Kay that is identified below, I did not get around until now to read all of it.

Please accept my apologies for not pointing you to it sooner. It makes little difference whether the apology is necessary because you read the article already or whether it is because you did not yet have a chance to read it.

Mercatornet
2008 04 04

Who’s oppressing who?

Barbara Kay
http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/whos_oppressing_who/

Barbara Kay’s article is “an excerpt from a speech given [in about the beginning of April 2008] to the McGill University Women’s Alumnae Association on the Impact of Feminism on Society.” Her article exposes modern feminism as an ideology that has had and still has a very detrimental, even deadly, wide-ranging impact on society; not just nationally but increasingly on a global level. She explains the nature of the destructive impact of feminism on families, on women, men (”If one sex wins, the other loses.”) and children, and on social, moral, economic and judiciary standards.

The article received 88 comments by people from all sectors of society and from all over the world. Those comments, too, are worth reading. They include things such as [more or less picked at random]:

• A complaint by a fathers rights activist who expresses his anger about being a victim of feminism because he is a father. Incongruously, he didn’t say anything at all about the suffering his children (for some of whom he deliberately ceased to be a father; which fact he naturally did not mention) have to go through on account of growing up without their father.
• A comment by Kim that questions Barbara Kay’s journalistic integrity and objects to the whole article because the article identifies the Arabs’ hostility toward Israel as “anti-Semitism”.
  Kim stated: “Arabs cannot, by definition, be “antisemitic” since the Semitic language family includes Arabic, Hebrew and Aramaic languages and the historical term “Semite” refers to all those who consider themselves descendants of the Biblical Shem, “anti-Semitism” should be likewise inclusive. “Anti-Semitism” should be extended to include prejudice against Arabs or Anti-Arabism.”
  Well, aside from being fond of run-on sentences, Kim is obviously a feminist. Weak and false logic has always been the crumbling all-pervasive glue of feminism; which almost certainly explains why feminists make so extremely little logical sense. Whether or not Kim will concede the point, Arabs can be and are anti-Semitic if they express their hatred of Jews in words and deeds — as surely as anyone can kill himself by accident or through suicide. However, going by Kim’s feminist logic, suicides could no more be real than anti-Semitism by Arabs against Jews can be.
• A comment by a father who raised children in a long-term marriage expressed profound disturbance on account of the state-manipulation of families identified by Barbara Kay. It is encouraging that this father so late in life discovered the long-standing reality of feminism’s oppressive social engineering. Let’s hope that he now will do something about what disturbs him.
• Then there is a profound comment by Yves Pageau, who stated that “In 1905 France voted a law déclaring the separation between Churches and state. I wished we would do likewise by declaring separation between feminism and government. It would make things a lot easier for everyone including feminism.” He is of course absolutely correct. Feminism is a state-sponsored and -imposed religion, not the least on account of the atheism (and, moreover, paganism) with which it is so exceedingly strong intertwined.
• Angelina Steenstra stated: “Having just read Ms Kay’s article I want to applaud and say thank you. Having been seduced by the feminist agenda and scarred, literally and figuratively by its false promises to the point of losing three children before birth to an abortion, abortifacient contraception and an ectopic pregnancy due to scar tissue from a sexually transmitted disease I am deeply grateful for this honest appraisal of the fruits of false feminism….”
• Denis identified the ideological foundation of feminism as being Marxist, by stating amongst other things, “The Marxists recognized the possibilities to use women as a way to expand Marxism throughout the culture. American women became useful idiots. The goal of the Marxists was the destruction of the West. To do this they needed to destabilize the relationships between males and females. They encouraged adversary and competition between men and women. They encouraged a promiscuous culture. America’s days as a great country will end. Those young and alive today will witness this….” Denis’ sentiments are born out by facts (to whom he points in his comments). If the feminist-communist connection is news to you, you may wish to look up some of the articles in this index.

The 88 comments contain a smattering of clearly feminist opinions (not surprisingly, quite a few are by feminist or homosexual men) that illuminate the extreme family-hostility of feminism. They provide an excellent profile not only of the diversity of cultural views on the family and on the politics of sex but also of the views of fathers-rights activists — of whom a few appear to be as self-centered as feminism is.

It must be hoped that in the end pro-family views in society will win over feminist extremism and over any other extremist cultural separatists. More articles like Barbara Kay’s Who’s oppressing who? will greatly help with that.

Barbara Kay’s article contains two relatively small flaws, although in absolute terms those flaws are not small at all. One of those is her omission of the Marxist ideological foundation of feminism. The other is an omission relating to children born to women late in life. The risks of such late births are serious for women, as Barbara Kay identified, but even more so for children. The risk that a child will be born with a chromosomal aberration increases with the age of the expectant mother. For Down’s syndrome alone, that risk ranges from one in 2000 live births by mothers in their twenties to one in 50 live births by mothers who are over 40.

Posted in Men's Issues, Education, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Family, Feminist Jurisprudence, The New World Order, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

May 14, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

World Congress of Families III
Mexico City; 29-31, 2004

FEMINISM AND THE FAMILY

Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D.

Quotes:

FEMINIST OUTCOMES ON THE FAMILY

Let me review some of the collateral damage from a promiscuous lifestyle of so-called “free” love.

• Currently, less than 52 percent of U.S. households include a married couple.

• More than 50 million women lived alone at the end of the twentieth century.

• Since 1970 the marriage rate has declined by about 25 percent and the divorce rate has increased by nearly 80 percent.  Half of all marriages have ended in divorce since the early ‘80s. This means that more than 35 million children  are left bereft with the majority of them living with a single mother and living in poverty.

• The total number of cohabitating couples at the beginning of this decade was approaching 5 million and the number is rising steadily.

• 10 million adults under the age of 25 will contract an STD this year.

• The staggering increase in out-of-wedlock births is the defining characteristic of the demographics of the 20^th century –– one-third of children are born out-of-wedlock in the U.S.

• Of the women between the ages of 15 and 44—those most likely to get married—less than half, only 49 percent, are now married.

• Abortion upon demand has meant the end of life for 45 million babies . . . and untold pain for the women who would have been their mothers.

• 59% of our children are now spending a significant portion of their childhood and adolescence in single parent families. That means, according to the social science evidence, that 25% of them will never reach productive adulthood.

Will we be able to do anything now?  At the end of the revolution?

One thing is clear – no nation can long endure without strong, healthy families founded on the inviolable institution of marriage –– the union of one man and one women committed to each other for a lifetime.

So something must be done – everyone has got to do something!

End Quotes

Full Story

Posted in Health, Family, Feminism, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

May 14, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

OneNewNow.com

Planting the seeds of a demographic winter

Robert Knight - Guest Columnist - 5/14/2008 2:10:00 PM

Did you know that planting a tree won’t save the earth? You’ve got to plant 483 trees just to offset your household’s carbon footprint. And that’s just for two people.

We know this because the Washington Post Home section on May 8 featured a cover story encouraging folks to plant trees while sternly warning them that this won’t help much because people are a cancer on the planet.

Okay, they didn’t quite put it that way, but it would be hard to miss the message. A graphic with 483 little green trees illustrates this stat from the EPA: “A two-person household is responsible for releasing 41,500 pounds of CO2 into the atmosphere each year. To offset that, each household would have to plant 483 trees and let them grow for 10 years.”

If a two-person household is that bad, what does that make families with children? Environmental criminals, at the least, and maybe earth wreckers….(Full Story)

Posted in Social-Destruction Enterprise, Health, Family, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

May 13, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

This article is almost a year old but important to look at again in the context of the evolution of the decay of the Occident and the role of the implementation of the international agenda for the planned destruction of the family in the acceleration of the deconstruction of western civilization.

Heretical Sex
Monday, August 27, 2007

The contemporary cultural and political war against the family has several causes, of which feminism is by far the most significant.

‘First-wave’ feminists in the early Twentieth Century were not at all anti-family. Indeed, one of their demands was that control of hearth and home should be the domain of women. Reference.

It was only as a result of second-wave feminism, in the late 1960s, that the feminist attack on the family began. Neil Lyndon, in his 1992 book ‘No More Sex War’, was perhaps the first to trace the origins of second-wave feminist ideology to Marxism….

Full Story

Posted in Family, Feminism, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

May 12, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Many males in western societies seem to be behaving very badly these days.

They seem to be becoming more involved with crime. They seem to be growing more dishonest. They seem to be increasingly hostile and aggressive toward others. They seem less committed to their partners and to their families. They are clearly doing less well in terms of their education. And they seem to be more pre-occupied with their own narrow self-interests than they used to be.

Why is this so?

What can possibly account for this apparent deterioration in the behaviours of western men?

Have their genes suddenly taken a dive for the worse?

Full Story

Posted in Men's Issues, Family, Feminism | Print | No Comments »

May 12, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

WorldNetDaily
2008 05 11

YOUR GOVERNMENT AT WORK

Daughter fails math test, so dad thrown in jail

Pop gets 6-month sentence for contributing to delinquency

A northern Kentucky man is in jail today – serving a 180-day sentence – because his 18-year-old daughter failed a math test and didn’t get her General Equivalency Diploma, or GED, as a previous court order required.

Brittany Gegner, the daughter, says if anyone should be jailed, it should be her.

“It’s like I should, if anybody should be punished for this,” Brittany told WCPO-TV in Cincinnati. “I would way rather me go to jail than my dad.”

Even Brian Gegner’s ex-wife agrees the judge’s decision is absurd….(Full Story)

Posted in Education, Family, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

May 12, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

[U.K.] Daily Mail
2008 05 12

Fire-bombs, mugging and gang warfare - just what has gone wrong with girls?

Melanie Phillips

Was this really what feminism was all about?

According to Home Office statistics, to be published later this week, crimes committed by girls aged between ten and 17 have shot up by some 25 per cent over a three-year period….There has also been a string of murders committed by girls, often sickeningly sadistic….

The Government’s claim that overall crime is falling, as this week’s statistics also reportedly show, bears scant relation to everyday life.

Such figures - even in the supposedly authoritative British Crime Survey - are highly selective or manipulated….

The number of women arrested for being drunk and disorderly has leapt tenfold over the past five years….(Full Story)

Posted in Family, Feminism, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

May 8, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Hallo Olivier,

Es ist gut dass es scheint dass Du in guter Stimmung bist und dass wir noch einmal unsere Gedanken austauschen koennen.

Zuerst noch, und nebenbei, Ich habe noch die Webseiten in Bezug auf den Hungerstrike in Berlin.  Gerade gestern oder am vorherigen Tag hatte ich mit Bezug auf Dein Schicksal Links zu Karin Jaeckel’s Beschreibung der Umstaende Deines Freispruch’s eingesetzt.

Freispruch ist ja Bloedsinn.  Mir fehlt viel am deutschen Wortschatz.  Darum werde ich jetzt lieber zwei englische Begriffe gebrauchen: “exoneration” (Freispruch auf Grund dessen dass die Unschuld des Angeklagten bewiesen wurde) gegenueber “acquittal” (Freispruch auf Grund dessen dass die Schuld des Angeklagten nicht bewiesen werden konnte).  Das Letztere heisst dass der Verdacht der Schuld immer noch besteht.

Du, viele Andere und ich wissen dass in Deinem Fall das Gerichtsurteil eine Farce ist.  Es tut mir leid dass Du, wie auch viele andere, so durch die Muehle gedreht wurdest.

Olivier, im Bezug auf dass Jugendamt gibt es in jedem englisch-sprachigen Land (sogar in Indien) so etwas wie das Sozialamt (Social Services), welches in vielen Laendern eine Abteilung hat die man unter verschiedenen Namen kennt: z. b. Kinderamt (Children’s Services) oder Jugendfuersorge (Youth & Welfare).  Diese Jugendaemter in den verschiedenen englisch-sprechenden Laendern arbeiten mit den ihnen entssprechenden Familiengerichten sehr eng zusammen (so ungefaehr verbunden und politisch gleichgerichtet wie es die Gestapo und die Volksgerichtshoefe waren) .

Diese Familiengerichte wurden in den spaeten sechziger und fruehen siebziger Jahren speziell erstellt; um die Scheidungsverfahren zu beschleunigen die sich aus den enorm grossen Arbeitsrueckstaenden der normalen Gerichtshoefe ergaben - als die sogenannte verschuldensunabhängige Ehescheidung die neue rechtsverbindliche Sozialnorm wurde.

Die Beschleunigung der Gerichtsverfahren in den Familiengerichten konnte nur dadurch erreicht werden indem man die Prozesse so vereinfachte wie es in vergleichbaren Volksgerichtshoefen aller totalitaeren Regierungen ueblich war und ist.  Damit gibt es in Familiengerichtsverfahren schwache Rechte sondern nur starke Richtungen.  Eine gute Zahl der nordamerkanischen Rechtsanwaelte (darunter sogar Richter) nennen die Familiengerichte “kangaroo courts” (korrupte Gerichte).

Dadurch wurde dann auch in der sogenannten freien Welt der Wunsch von Marx, Engels und Lenin, der Wunsch auf die freie Liebe (heute nennt man das “sexual freedom”; Ich konnte keinen deutschen Ausdruck dafuer finden), zur Tatsache, indem man ganz einfach den Ehevertrag undurchsetzbar machte und dann in fast allen Faellen der verschuldensunabhängigen Ehescheidungen den Ehemaennern die Schuld auflegte.

Ich weiss nicht viel von franzoesischen Familien-Statistiken, aber in allen englisch-sprachigen Laendern sind sie sehr leicht genau so schlimm (oder vielleicht noch schlimmer) als die welche in Deutschland zutreffen.  Ich weiss aber dass die familien-feindlichen Dinge in Spanien sich jezt immer schneller den internationalen Normen anpassen, obwohl Spanien noch vor wenigen Jahren mit dem feministischen Sozialfortschritt etwas zurueckgeblieben war, bedeutend mehr zurueck als es in Deutschland der Fall war.

In der Abwesenheit von genauen Vergleichstatistiken die es andererweits beweisen, moechte ich suggerieren dass jedes andere Jugendamt irgendwo in der Welt Dir oder anderen Auslaendern gegenueber gleichmaessige Unrechte ausueben wuerde.

Nach meiner Ansicht wird sich nicht viel mit der Durchfuehrung der internationalen Agenda fuer die geplante Zerstoerung der Familie aendern, so lange nicht bis Maenner und Vaeter sich so effektiv und international vernetzen wie es feministische und aesserst linke Rechtsanwaelte, Richter, Sozialarbeiter, Sozialwissenschaftler and andere solche Aktivisten es tun.  Dass die letzteren es tun ist einfach eine Tatsache.  Sie vernetzen sich ausserhalb der oeffentlichen diplomatischen Regierungsverbindungen.

So lange das stattfinded wird die westliche Welt stetig zugreifend korrupt, bis sie zum Ende - innerhalb von hoechst Vier Generationen und dem roemischen Reich gleichend - unter ihrem eigenen Gewicht zusammenfallen wird.  Die westliche Welt wird nicht mit einem Knall sondern mit leisem Gewimmer verschwinden, da die stetig fallenden Geburtszahlen es dazu bringen werden dass die eingeborenen Bevoelkerungen durch die grossen Geburtszahlen anderer Voelker ersetzt werden.  Genau wie beim Untergang des roemischen Reiches finden nun grosse Voelkerwanderungen statt (die durch die Vereinten Nationen sehr stark gefoerdert werden).  Man will es damit ermoeglichen die Weltbevoelkerung bei dem Jahr 2150 bis auf eine Milliarde Menschen oder weniger herunter zu bringen, um den Einfluss der Menschheit (die man als ein Karzinom auf dem Angesicht der Mutter Erde ansieht) als ertragbar zu veringern.

Sehr wahrscheinlich wird sich bis zum unvermeidlichen Zusammenbruch nichts mehr aendern.   Es gibt nichts Neues unter der Sonne.  Das letzte Mal, in 1945, wurde bis zum bitteren Ende noch immer gesungen: “Wir werden weitermarschieren, bis alles in Scherben faellt…” obwohl alles schon in Schutt und Asche zerfallen war.  Ich war 10 Jahre alt als das zu Ende ging und muss nun - wie Andere meines Alters nahe am Ende meines Lebens - den Anfang eines anderen, noch groesseren Zusammenbruches erfahren.

Alles Gute,

Walter

P.S.: Die Zahl der einzelnen Besucher meiner Homepage ist waehrend der letzten 12 Monate um 2,5 Millionen angestiegen und gleicht damit im Totalen pappa.com in der weltweiten Rangstelle.

Posted in Divorce, Family, Feminist Jurisprudence, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

May 2, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Any man who believes in that feminist-inspired hoax is in for a rude awakening.

The following article is a slightly edited version of one that was posted to the F4L mailing list 2003 10 07.

You may have seen the last part of this message already, maybe not, because my copy of the message containing that, which I posted very early this morning, hasn’t come back to me yet. Perhaps the snoopers aren’t done with it yet. If that’s the case, I hope they enjoy what they read. Still, the delay puzzles me. I’m not even on the hit-list of Status of Women Canada.

The preamble in the following is a commentary I used to introduce the forwarded statistics to someone who is not on this list. I hope it sweetens things a bit if you should receive the statistics a second time now. If you wish to forward the message, go ahead. It contains no secrets that need to be guarded.

The issues of concern in this article relate to unhappiness caused by controlling and violent women in marriages that never broke up.

The appended statistics relate to the consequences of men’s status and position of “power” in society. They show that women are not stepping up to the plate in equitable numbers. The problems inherent in the forwarded statistics and explained in the related web pages were not caused just by feminists all by their lonesome selves.

It wasn’t even just feminists and women who caused those problems. If things are to change for the better, men have to come to acknowledge a major share of the guilt.

I wonder how many men permanently damaged their backs by living up to the Hollywood stereotype that carries a bride across the threshold. However, that is only a small one of many manifestations of the problem.  A multitude of methods have been devised and are being used by which men’s backs are being broken, literally and figuratively.

One of my friends led a down-trodden existence for the duration of his long marriage. He pampered and coddled his wife and became a total slave to her and their two boys, because she was given to having frequent heart attacks. I must have heard at least 30 times during the last 25 years that she had only six months left to live.

She could produce “heart attacks” at will – no kidding – and used them rigorously to get her way. The consequence was that she literally exercised and shaped only her bottom by permanently sitting on it and from that throne firmly controlled all other family-members’ activities and minds.

Full Story

Posted in Health, Men's Issues, Family, Child Abduction | Print | No Comments »

May 2, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Heritage Foundation

May 13, 2004

The Social Scientific Data on the Impact of Marriage and Divorce on Children

by Patrick F. Fagan, Ph.D.

Testimony

Testimony Before the Senate of the United States, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Subcommittee on Science, Technology, And Space regarding the Social Scientific Data on the Impact of Marriage and Divorce on Children.

(Full Story; Charts and graphs included in the testimony are available in the Powerpoint presentation, 1.4 MB)

Posted in Family, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »