- Abortion (37)
- Anorexia Nervosa (6)
- Battered Men's Shelters (4)
- Books & Films (9)
- Censorship (43)
- Charitable Status (1)
- Child Abduction (28)
- Child Abuse (30)
- Child Murder (70)
- Child Support (14)
- Child-Custody Awards (72)
- Civil Rights (136)
- Corruption (3)
- Divorce (113)
- Economy (12)
- Education (72)
- False Allegations (22)
- Family (236)
- Feminism (174)
- Feminist Jurisprudence (180)
- Gay issues (31)
- Health (105)
- Humour (9)
- Judiciary (65)
- Marriage (5)
- Maternal Rights (16)
- Media Bias (77)
- Men and Women Work (51)
- Men's Issues (299)
- Organizational News (33)
- Parental Alienation (7)
- Paternal Rights (83)
- Paternity Fraud (28)
- Propaganda Exposed (230)
- Religion (7)
- Shared Parenting (23)
- Single-Parent (8)
- Social-Destruction Enterprise (109)
- Suicides (16)
- The New World Order (248)
- Tips and Notes (8)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Violence by Proxy (19)
- Web Statistics (6)
- Women's Violence (301)
- March 3, 2012: [Canada] Shared Custody – Benefits Entitlement
- November 11, 2011: Men, women and war
- October 11, 2011: Husband-Killing Syndicates
- September 30, 2011: MGTOW
- September 28, 2011: Catherine Kieu Becker pleads not guilty in penis-slicing
- September 26, 2011: Divorce factories
- September 22, 2011: Dr David Evans: Four fatal pieces of evidence
- September 12, 2011: Abuse of the Elderly
- August 16, 2011: The battle for the family -- Front-line news
- August 13, 2011: The London Riots -- Causes
Blogroll
- Angry Harry
- Canada Free Press
- Dictionary for Dads
- Fathers for Life
- Le Blogue de GERARD
- Marty Nemko's Men's Issues
- Mensactivism.org
- P.A.R.E.N.T. International
- REAL Women of Canada
- roadkillradio.com
- Robert Whiston
- Stephen Baskerville
- The Historyscoper's Soros Watch Blog
- The Rights of Man (UK)
- Today's Family News
- UK Centre for Crime and Justice Studies
- William Gairdner
Help Lines for Men
Men's and Family Rights Organizations
- March 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Politics 101
On 01/03/2011 8:45 PM, [name omitted] wrote:
Many thanks for your information. I have contacted my [elected representative] (a woman. . . lol) so I’ll let you know what transpires. Thanks again….
Let’s hope that she can do something for you. Chances are better than 50:50 in your favour that she will. After all, you are a potential vote for her. The more shaky her position, the more likely it is that she will help you. On the other hand, civil servants are not bothered by such considerations. They can use their positions to further their pet-ideologies with impunity, provided they toe the party-line of their respective organizations or departments. It follows that real political power resides in government bureaucracies, not with our elected representatives.
There is nothing wrong with a woman being your representative, as such. Being a woman does not necessarily mean that she is a feminist or unwilling to help you.
The reality is that being a feminist is a condition that is independent of sex. Moreover, the pro-feminist bias in individuals produces somewhat more male than female feminists. For many men who are feminists, being feminists gives them the illusion that their affliction earns them more respect in the opinions of women whom they wish to impress. That works well for the women who can be impressed.
On the other hand, women generally feel that they do not need to impress men (but, generally, women most definitely have a great need to impress other women). They are more practical than that.
For many truly honest women, wanting to be feminists poses a great dilemma. They know full-well that being feminists implies the obligation to be fully equal to men. That means, that to be able to reach full equality, they would have to give up too many of the advantages that feminism provided them with. However, most being extremely practical, virtually all women — feminist or not — are very reluctant to forgo any of those advantages.
Let there be no mistake. Those tendencies are ingrained and have been re-enforced through selective breeding throughout evolution. Feminism is older than civilization and predates the advent of humanity. For instance, you can observe feminist tactics in action when watching the movies that anthropologists have made of the social interactions in the daily lives of troupes of chimpanzees.
It would not be wise to discuss any of those observations with [elected representative]. :-)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.