Sorry, but I don’t deal with enough cases like that to be able to offer an informed opinion.

Some other websites may have more blog traffic so that you can get a better answer than I can give. Do you need help with finding such a site? I have not been involved for some years in posting to such a site. I would have to try and find one for you. Have you tried that? Have you looked in the directory at http://www.canadianequalparentinggroups.ca/ ?

I can only tell you that I am not aware of any father accused of sexual child abuse who was not also barred from all child visitation, at least until the allegation was discussed in court.

You are correct. It is not about what is best for the child, although all the powers insist otherwise. It is about catering to the mother.

One burning question that I have that maybe you have heard about—
Is it common practice of three government departments to let a man take his 2yr old daughter two days a week while they are investigating him for sexual abuse of that child. She made the allegations one day before my first court ordered day two months ago and we have been back to court once since then. Is this just proof to show that the RCMP, social services and the courts themselves don’t really care about my daughter. Needless to say her mother must not care either. A judge would have to throw me in jail before I handed my kids over to someone that I believed was hurting them.
When all is said and done there should be a child endagerment suit thrown at them all. It just makes me so bitter that I am the only one that is trying to do whats best for my child and Im the one that is taking the biggest beating.

Sorry to hear about all of the problems you have to experience, but that is pretty much the way things work.

Two things: The false allegations by your ex are the norm, especially for someone who claims (whether based on truth or not) that she experienced child-sexual-abuse. Moreover, you have no clue that the allegations against her prior ex are true. However, if she lied about him, then don’t be surprised that she lied about you.

About fathers rights organizations in Saskatchewan, yes, for virtually all of the more than 20 years I have been dealing with such issues, there has never been an organization that existed and was active for more than a very short time in Saskatchewan. The best thing you could do would be to start a fathers rights organization and to keep it going. It helps to get together with other men who are going through the divorce- and custody-grinder/wringer.

Let me know if you need any tips on how to go about starting an organization. To get some ideas on that, this link will execute a search for articles at this blog and its affiliated website on how to get in touch with or find fathers rights organizations.

I spent 4yrs with her and we have a 2yr old daughter. Once I couldnt take the way her mind worked I left her and filed for shared custody. She then told me I couldnt see my daughter because I do drugs. I did full drug testing the next day. After the results came in clean she pressed charges of bodily harm to her and my daughter. I represented myself in criminal court and the charges were dismissed. At the second adjournment of family court the judge granted me 2 days a week with my little girl. Two days later I was taken to the police station and questioned about sexual abuse of my little baby. I answered all the sick questions and agreed to a polygraph. Month later social services sent me a letter saying the investigation is over and they found i did nothing. At the third adjournment of family court her lawyer adjourned on the basis of the ongoing sexual abuse investigation for which i have a letter stating it was done. I went straight to the police after court and it turns out there was miscommunication between the police and social services and we were still waiting for the polygraph. I then declined to take it and have yet to find out where it goes now. This was just this week.

Heres the kickers– I still have my daughter 2 days a week (hmmm) I have 2 other daughters that live with me week on week off age 13yrs and 9 yrs, no one ever talked to them. How is it even possible that I am under investigation for molesting the girl that the courts are letting me have 2 days a week. But to this day through all this I still am not allowed to talk to my daughter on the phone.

She can run to the police and say stuff and my life is destroyed but I have undeniable proof that her closest sister lied under oath on the stand in our criminal trial and I am having a hell of a time trying to have charges brought against her. She screwed up and tried saying I would hurt people because I was somewhere where she was and I tried hurting her. Problem is she picked a place that has video cameras with full coverage and the day she picked was the same day I ran into my ex there. All this supposedly happened three days before our court date and she all of a sudden couldnt remember if it was that day or even what time of the day it was.

This is just a fraction of the crap I have endoured.

This just goes to show you that our whole system is flawed beyond belief and it is severely screwing up our children.

If I would have known what I would have to go through I would of chose suicide first. My life is crippled almost to the point of no return. I am on the verge of having to give up my other two daughters. And I dont see an end in sight yet. I have great respect for the men that make it through this and really feel for the ones that have no choice but to give up.
I am in Saskathewan and if there is anyone willing to give me pointers or take on this corrupt system with me please let me know.

when I signed up to be a father I signed up for life

Yes, but the forces who are out to abrogate the family in the name of women’s rights won’t let you.

Two predominant facts are at play:

1. All it takes to destroy the family is to removes its weakest link, the father.

2. The removal of fathers is a pre-requisite for the implementation of the international agenda for the planned destruction of the family.

http://www.bclocalnews.com/fraser_valley/theprogress/news/98773464.html

B.C. aims to defuse divorce conflict
“A discussion paper released Monday suggests that child “custody” should be called “guardianship” and “access” should be called “parenting time.”
=========

“access” should be called “parenting time.”
——–

This is just about enough to send me into the deep end.

Access is for the benefit of the children. By denying access for frivolous reasons the children suffer. One rather obnoxious element concerns denying the children access if the NCA is short on child support. Countless other excuses from the particularly venomous false accusations have no penalty even though denying the child access is unconstitutional and in argument with our Human Rights Act.

The results are in as predicted by the science behind the children of divorce.

We get a change of name to an already failed government program in acknowledgement of how serious the coming of Gen U is even compared to the gang capital of the world.

Jay Hill as an Alliance MP had a mild change to the Divorce Act killed in committee. Now we get another in a series of hay that’s been through the bull, no wonder he’s has enough.

The results of this abusive attempt to create 2 million early learning occupants of the proposed state raised children initiative is the parents of Gen U.

Only presumed joint physical custody under strict rules will stop everyone from the parents to politicians for votes to lawyers for profit in using children for their interests and not the children.

To stop the abuse, the power to abuse has to be removed from all parties.

Presumed Joint Physical Custody.

Your work over the years has been exemplary and honest. If you are wrong in any way it would be in not explaining how the Judicial Act and the Legal Profession Act have shielded and enriched the lawyer/politician class as well as creating a large group of supporter groups that also share an interest in protecting the Law Society.

Allan

Thanks for that, Allan.

Yes, I never wrote about the Judicial Act and the Legal Profession Act, but that would be mainly because those acts relate to the circumstances in the U.K., and all along I wrote about and posted things that are closer to home for me, in Canada and in the U.S.

Still, Fathers for Life contains many commentaries and analyses that relate to the legal industry and how it is being used to re-engineer society.

Check http://fathersforlife.org/ToC_law_justice_judiciary.htm

You may also wish to make some searches at Fathers for Life. For instance, in the search entry field in the upper right-hand corner, enter the following search string: legal industry

You can vary that search string in any way you like. A search for “legal profession act” will not provide any search returns, but if you leave off the leading and trailing quotation marks, you will produce a search return list with some entries that will be of interest to you.