September 15, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

In the best interest of the child

From the mail box of Fathers for Life:

To the judge in my latest child-custody and -access hearing:

Sir(s)

This past week I have had to attend court for the CSA [the UK Child Support Agency] and Family Court for redefined contact and, I might add, for the last time! You can only push someone so far.  So, congratulations, the system has rendered me bankrupt, insists I still pay and pay, but “Too bad Mr. Farmer you are not to see your children who tantalizingly pass your door each day on their way to school.”

Far from being a poor, violent or uncaring father I have done all in my power to offer my children a seamless path from broken family to the security of a second family home and the stability of this being located close to the former family home and at an equal distance to both schools; this at great personal difficulty to me at the age of 50, to have to start again from scratch and thankfully with the support of my wife and family.

Yet the same family courts who granted access to me in 2004 will still allow the mother with her sickly smug smile to wield the big stick and say NO to contact.  Are the children’s interests being served?

It is the courts not being able to enforce the perfectly good order designed to offer the same level of stability whilst the children are so young, and until they reach an age when they could decide which parent to be with.

For me, my children have reached that age, but the controlling mother will not release them from her shackles and not even allow them to call on the phone or call in for tea on the occasional evening after school for a few hours, just to mend the bridges the mother has broken.

That is the fundamental flaw with this law that allows the mother to abuse it, yet not to be reprimanded.  In fact, it empowers the mother to do just as she wishes, whilst ‘cocking a snoot’ at the judge, at the social workers, but above all at the children she is meant to be acting as responsible carer for.

Consider the next time you ridicule a ‘Batman’ Character that he is taking his plight out of the family environment, that what the mother does is from within and what long term effect that might have on vulnerable children.

If my children return to me in a few years, when in their late teens and say, look Dad, I have been stealing or have been involved in drugs or violence, would it not have been better for me to be there for them now, to prevent them from getting into trouble in the first place and to be there to answer any query my children have, no matter how trivial it may seem — just to show there is someone with an answer?

My own father never said ‘I don’t know’, if he could not answer my worries immediately.  He would not stop till he could, and that kind of reassurance means a lot when you are young and especially today, with all the peer and media pressure the kids are under on a day to day basis.

If this appalling law was reviewed and put right today, it will still take a generation to put right the social ills the law fosters right now. Given that the family-law courts’ decisions are made inviolable, there is no point in having a judge sitting in court in the first place!

The reality is, there are some who have to live with the heartache, knowing there is nothing more to be done, the children are lost, the home is lost, the childhood is lost, you will never reclaim those lost years, and the memories will not be made.

The pain of that will be with you evermore, and any future contact will be a grim reminder of what was lost at a time you could have saved it.

Now is that time, but I cannot stop the passage of time, and the happy memories I have of the time with my father will not be continued on in my own children. I have done nothing wrong.  I am not a monster but a loving caring Dad, and the system has stolen the opportunity to help my children through their formative years into adulthood.

Dave Farmer

170 Winford Drive Broxbourne Herts EN10 6PN England

Posted in Health, Divorce, Paternal Rights, Civil Rights, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, Child Abduction, The New World Order, Feminist Jurisprudence, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

September 15, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Faded, but not forgotten

The slayings of four boys by their mother left a community in shock more than a decade ago. Those who remember say the boys ‘deserve recognition for their lives and the lives they touched.’

By Linda Lou
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

September 14, 2008

The graves of the three Eubanks boys, shot to death by their mother in 1997 in San Marcos, rest under a thin camphor tree near concrete stairs.

Instead of headstones, concrete blocks slightly larger than bricks display the initial of each boy’s first name, their last name and the year they died. The gray blocks, surrounded by trimmed grass at the San Marcos Cemetery, appear well-maintained, but the letters are fading. The plain markers reveal little about the victims.

“A Eubanks” is on the left, “B Eubanks” rests in the middle, then “M Eubanks.” Austin was 7, Brigham, 6, and Matthew, 4.

Their half brother, Brandon Armstrong, 14, also killed by their mother, is buried in Texas and memorialized with a headstone there.

Online: Brandon Armstrong’s father has created a Web site to shine a light on this kind of tragedy. For the story, go to uniontrib.com/more/eubanks.
The slayings of the four brothers are arguably one of the darkest moments in San Marcos history. Like the letters on the grave markers, however, what happened to the boys has faded from many residents’ memories. The house where the murders happened was torched by firefighters in a training exercise. Some might not know the murders ever happened – more than 10,000 people have moved to the city since 1997….(Full Story)

Posted in Child Murder, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

September 15, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

From the mail box of Fathers for Life:

I live in the U.S. But I’m hoping that you might know where I can get some help. Last year my son was fondled by another boy. This year he yelled at the boy, calling him gay, and pushed him. The supervisor saw it and now my son is in BIG trouble, probably a hate “crime.” The assistant principal and I had agreed that my son was honest and well-raised. He implied that he’d have done the same thing. I thought I was done with this and was surprised when the school sent me a letter outlining my son’s unacceptable behavior without acknowledging what led up to it. This is a “politically correct” situation and my son’s caught in the middle.

Do you have any information or experiences that can help guide me? Is there an organization in the States that can help?

[The father of a sexually assaulted boy]

Does anyone have advice for the father of the sexually assaulted boy?

Posted in Civil Rights, Gay issues, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

September 15, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Many of you probably know about that already, but it is always good to have a reminder, as familiarity breeds, if not contempt, then at least apathy.

From the Internet:

The Sad Passing of Common Sense

Today we mourn the passing of an old friend - Common Sense - who has been with us for many years.

No one knows for sure how old he was since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic red tape.

He will be remembered as having cultivated such valuable lessons as knowing when to come out of the rain, why the early bird gets the worm, life isn’t always fair, and maybe it was my fault.

Common Sense lived by simple, sound financial policies (don’t spend more than you earn) and reliable parenting strategies (adults, not children, are in charge).

His health began to deteriorate rapidly when well intentioned but overbearing regulations were set in place.

Reports of a six year old boy charged with sexual harassment for kissing a classmate [upon her urging him to do so - see footnote 1], teens suspended from school using mouthwash after lunch, and a teacher fired for reprimanding an unruly student, only worsened his condition.

Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked teachers for doing the job they themselves failed to do in disciplining their unruly children. It declined even further when schools were required to get parental consent to administer Paracetamol, sun lotion, or a sticky plaster to a student - but, could not inform the parents when a student became pregnant and wanted to have an abortion.

Common Sense lost the will to live as the Ten Commandments became contraband, churches became businesses and criminals received better treatment than their victims.

Common Sense took a beating when you couldn’t defend yourself from a burglar in your own home and the burglar could sue you for assault. Common Sense finally gave up the will to live after a woman failed to realise that a steaming cup of coffee was hot. She spilled a little in her lap and was promptly awarded a huge settlement.

Common Sense was preceded in his death by his parents, Truth and Trust, his wife Discretion, his daughter Responsibility, and his son, Reason.

He is survived by three stepbrothers; I Know My Rights, Someone Else is to Blame, and I’m a Victim.

Not many attended his funeral because so few realised he was gone. If you still remember him, pass this on. If not, join the majority and do nothing.

P.S. And to top it all off, as one final insult to the passing of Common Sense, we now give compensation to drug addicts for having to go cold turkey when we put them in jail!!!

___________________
Notes:

1. ….One of my school buddies received a public ridiculing and castigation.  It came about because he was [partly] Jewish.  I did not know he was that, nor would I have cared if I would have known.  He was my friend.  His mother had asked my closest friend Willi and me to come and pick him up on the way to school and to drop him off afterwards, because some older boys were bullying him.
   The Hitler Youth marched into our class one day, with drums, fifes and flags.  The school principal and a few party officials showed up with them.  They singled out my friend who sat towards the back of the class.  He was asked to come to the front and was used as an exhibit to illustrate what an enemy of the Fatherland looked like: curly brown hair, brown beady eyes, budding hooked nose, etc..
   Does anyone think that what was done to my friend was that much different from putting Jonathan Prevette^* in isolation for giving his friend a peck on the cheek on her request?  My friend was castigated because he was [partly] Jewish.  Jonathan Prevette had to spend time in isolation instead of at the scheduled ice-cream party, because he was male.

   Jonathan came out of his ordeal intact, because his mother could put up a fight for his rights.  My school buddy was dead the morning after the public ridiculing.There was no answer at the door when we went to pick him up to give him protection on the way to school, as his mother had asked us to.  His mother had taken her own and his life overnight.  She had preferred a gas chamber of her own making over that which awaited them.  She had turned on the oven without lighting it.  I found out when the teacher, Fraulein Krappot, who had started it all, sent me to my friend’s house to find out why he wasn’t at school.  My seven-year-old friend died because he was considered to be an enemy of the state.

   Nine-year-old Sean Pelletier (page down to “Oral Questions, SEAN PELLETIER CASE at that URL) in Chilliwack, B.C., Canada, hanged himself because he could not tolerate a life without his beloved father — to whom his mother denied him access.  He is now no better off than my school buddy.  He also was a direct victim of discrimination gone wild.  So are the teen-aged sons (three in total) of my neighbours’ families who committed suicide within the last few years.The [now more than] 300 boys and 3,000 men in all of Canada who kill themselves each year are victims of gender discrimination and gender hatred just the same.  Many of them die simply because nobody cares or has any compassion for them.  They die because they have given up hope in a society that is anti-male and appears to offer no promise of a better future for them.  In February, 1997, we heard on the news that within the preceding month five teenagers took their lives in a single town in central Canada.  The announcer kept it gender-neutral.  He said they were teenagers.
   We supposed then that we would see more details about that epidemic of suicides in a single town when the papers would publish more about it, that we would then know which gender it is that is represented by these teens.  It should not have come as a surprise to anyone if they were all male.  On average, the chances are 5:1 that they would be.  It seemed to me that the fact that the announcer did not mention their gender is a give-away.  The gender is not important when men or boys are involved.  The gender is then hidden, because to mention it might create concern for the male sex (as it turned out later, all were boys)…. (Full story)

_______
* Jonathan Prevette is a boy in South Carolina who as a first grader violated his teacher’s interpretation of his school’s sexual harassment rules.

–Walter

Posted in Health, Media Bias, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Civil Rights, Men's Issues, Child-Custody Awards, The New World Order, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, Women's Violence | Print | 1 Comment »

September 15, 2008 by Walter Schneider.

Investigative journalism that can expose the secrecy of the US Federal Judiciary as a cover for coordinated wrongdoing among its judges

Reporters’ opportunity to test judges’ unaccountability at the US Judicial Conference on September 15-17

Call for action by reporters

By Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org

Sep. 15, 2008

Dear Reporter and Judicial Reform Advocate,

Kindly find below an article submitted for publication that deals with the annual meeting of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts and the other top federal judges of the Judicial Conference in Washington, DC, Tuesday-Wednesday, September 16-17, 2008.

The Conference Committees are scheduled to meet on Monday, September 15, at the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building (see below).

The Conference will afford reporters, investigative journalists, and bloggers the opportunity to confront the judges of the Judiciary’s governing body with, in general, the facts discussed below of their unaccountability for the totality of their conduct of judicial and non-judicial acts and, in particular, the referenced evidence of bankruptcy, district, and circuit judges who are abusing such unaccountability to support and cover up a bankruptcy fraud scheme driven by a most insidious corruptor: Money!

In addition, given the enormous power that judges wield over people’s property, liberty, and even lives, and the fact that however they exercise it, they can get away with it, they have turned their judicial power into absolute power. Such is the power that corrupts absolutely.

For those media people who seize the opportunity of the Conference to set in motion an investigation into how unaccountable judges have used the Money and Power corruptors to operate a scheme and who ultimately bring judges down from their “Above the law” position to account for their coordination of wrongdoing, the rewards can be high:

1. to win a Pulitzer Prize, as Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward of the Washington Post did for their exposé of Watergate;
2. to be portrayed in a movie, as they were in “All the President’s Men”, staring Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman; and
3. to earn the higher moral reward of the recognition of a grateful nation for their contribution to bringing our judicial system closer to the lofty goal of “Equal Justice Under Law” in a nation where nobody is supposed to be above the law.

I respectfully invite you to forward the Newsrelease below to your contacts in the news media and to encourage them to cover the Conference and interview its members (see Service List at http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/JNinfo/DrCordero_JNinfo_6jun8.pdf ).

I would appreciate your letting me know at your earliest convenience whether you will publish the article.

Sincerely,

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq

Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org

Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org

59 Crescent Street
Brooklyn, NY 11208
tel. (718)827-9521

Posted in Judiciary, Civil Rights, Men's Issues, Feminist Jurisprudence, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »