- Abortion (34)
- Anorexia Nervosa (6)
- Books (1)
- Censorship (33)
- Child Abduction (18)
- Child Murder (58)
- Child Support (7)
- Child-Custody Awards (53)
- Civil Rights (77)
- Divorce (83)
- Economy (5)
- Education (62)
- Family (205)
- Feminism (139)
- Feminist Jurisprudence (131)
- Gay issues (27)
- Health (83)
- Judiciary (35)
- Media Bias (58)
- Men and Women Work (35)
- Men's Issues (229)
- Organizational News (28)
- Paternal Rights (54)
- Paternity Fraud (24)
- Propaganda Exposed (190)
- Religion (3)
- Shared Parenting (21)
- Social-Destruction Enterprise (69)
- Suicides (11)
- The New World Order (195)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Web Statistics (3)
- Women's Violence (250)
- November 5, 2009: Praising gender inequity raises feminist ire
- October 14, 2009: Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice
- October 10, 2009: A "fare-well" of sorts
- July 23, 2009: Dad & Things blog-updates back in operation
- June 23, 2009: Toddler's hands dunked into boiling water
- June 10, 2009: Sexual Orientation -- Nature or Nurture?
- June 7, 2009: Fred says...
- May 30, 2009: Why Did Feminists Attack The Family?
- May 12, 2009: Roadkillradio.com
- May 5, 2009: The economic down-turn and Canada
Blogroll
Help Lines for Men
Men's and Family Rights Organizations
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
UK: 1 in 5 fathers wrongly identified as the father
guardian.co.uk
DNA testing: One in five fathers wrongly identified by mothers in Child Support Agency Claims
No prosecutions made for false identifications
Almost £4bn uncollected from non-resident parents
[From the figures provided in the article it can be calculated that in the 2007-2008 interval the taxpayers paid £53.62 for every £100.00 collected in child support.]
Patrick Wintour, political editor
The Guardian,
Friday August 1 2008
Nearly one in five paternity claims [19%] handled by the Child Support Agency end up showing the mother has deliberately or inadvertently misidentified the father, figures show….
Under child support legislation it is a criminal offence to make a false statement or representation, and to provide false documents or information.
However, according to the CSA, there has not been a single prosecution of a woman for making a false claim. The figures showing the number of false paternity claims have been compiled using freedom of information legislation….
The CSA does not have figures for whether any women have named the wrong father on more than one occasion. They also appear to have no information as to why women named the wrong father.
CSA rules state that if the DNA test establishes that the named father is the actual father, then he must pay for the cost of the test. If the DNA establishes he is not the father then the taxpayer pays, so there is no consquence for the mother in making a false claim….(Full Story)
__________________
Comment by Fathers for Life: The article identifies the horrific extent of paternity fraud. Paternity fraud is a crime. Not only is that crime directed against a large number of men but also against an even larger number of children.
Women must not be permitted to get away with those crimes!
The solution is simple. There must be mandatory paternity testing with the birth of every child.
However, it is not unusual that feminists and feminist sympathizers in DNA testing labs falsify DNA test results. Therefore DNA testing upon the birth of a child must be performed by two independent DNA testing labs.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.