- Abortion (34)
- Anorexia Nervosa (6)
- Books (1)
- Censorship (33)
- Child Abduction (18)
- Child Murder (58)
- Child Support (7)
- Child-Custody Awards (53)
- Civil Rights (77)
- Divorce (83)
- Economy (5)
- Education (62)
- Family (205)
- Feminism (139)
- Feminist Jurisprudence (131)
- Gay issues (27)
- Health (83)
- Judiciary (35)
- Media Bias (58)
- Men and Women Work (35)
- Men's Issues (229)
- Organizational News (28)
- Paternal Rights (54)
- Paternity Fraud (24)
- Propaganda Exposed (190)
- Religion (3)
- Shared Parenting (21)
- Social-Destruction Enterprise (69)
- Suicides (11)
- The New World Order (195)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Web Statistics (3)
- Women's Violence (250)
- November 5, 2009: Praising gender inequity raises feminist ire
- October 14, 2009: Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice
- October 10, 2009: A "fare-well" of sorts
- July 23, 2009: Dad & Things blog-updates back in operation
- June 23, 2009: Toddler's hands dunked into boiling water
- June 10, 2009: Sexual Orientation -- Nature or Nurture?
- June 7, 2009: Fred says...
- May 30, 2009: Why Did Feminists Attack The Family?
- May 12, 2009: Roadkillradio.com
- May 5, 2009: The economic down-turn and Canada
Blogroll
Help Lines for Men
Men's and Family Rights Organizations
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Canadian freedom of speech seen by Australia as a joke
The Australian
Canada’s deadly tongue trap
James Allan | June 06, 2008
HERE is a little known fact about Canada. It is today a country where you can say or write things that are true and yet still be brought before a tribunal.
That tribunal can fine you; it can order you to pay money to the people who complained about your words; it can force you to issue an apology; it can do all three.
That’s not all, though. The people who complained will not need to hire a lawyer.
Their costs will be picked up by the state, by the taxpayers.
You, on the other hand, will have to hire a lawyer to defend yourself. And there will be no award of costs at the end, so that even if you win, you will still be out of pocket to your lawyers tens of thousands of dollars.
Of course, you will not win.
Why? Because in the entire history of these Canadian tribunals, hearing these cases, those people like you who have been hauled before these tribunals have never won - not one single time.
The complainants always win.
This amazing inroad into free speech will surely come as a surprise to most Australians, not least because in so many ways Canada is the country closest to ours in terms of constitutional and democratic history….(Full Story)
__________
James Allan’s article describes a Canadian institution for censoring of the truth with the full and totalitarian power of judicial bureaucrats. A Canadian human rights tribunal brought the Report Newsmagazine to its knees and heavily contributed to causing it to stop publishing. Here is Link Byfield’s reaction to the 2002 decision by the Alberta Human Rights Commission against the Report Newsmagazine. Link Byfield’s public response to the Alberta Human Rights Commission should, more accurately, be called a farewell to freedom of speech in Canada.
Incidentally, Ezra Levant took over where the Report Newsmagazine left off. His newsmagazine Western Standard (now also no longer published) had filled the niche left by the Report Newsmagazine. However, as of now the Western Standard’s website and shotgun-blog are still alive and well.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.