You are currently browsing the dads & things weblog archives for the day April 7, 2008.
- Abortion (34)
- Anorexia Nervosa (6)
- Books (1)
- Censorship (33)
- Child Abduction (18)
- Child Murder (58)
- Child Support (7)
- Child-Custody Awards (53)
- Civil Rights (77)
- Divorce (83)
- Economy (5)
- Education (62)
- Family (205)
- Feminism (139)
- Feminist Jurisprudence (131)
- Gay issues (27)
- Health (83)
- Judiciary (35)
- Media Bias (58)
- Men and Women Work (35)
- Men's Issues (229)
- Organizational News (28)
- Paternal Rights (54)
- Paternity Fraud (24)
- Propaganda Exposed (190)
- Religion (3)
- Shared Parenting (21)
- Social-Destruction Enterprise (69)
- Suicides (11)
- The New World Order (195)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Web Statistics (3)
- Women's Violence (250)
- November 5, 2009: Praising gender inequity raises feminist ire
- October 14, 2009: Behind the Black Robes: Failed Justice
- October 10, 2009: A "fare-well" of sorts
- July 23, 2009: Dad & Things blog-updates back in operation
- June 23, 2009: Toddler's hands dunked into boiling water
- June 10, 2009: Sexual Orientation -- Nature or Nurture?
- June 7, 2009: Fred says...
- May 30, 2009: Why Did Feminists Attack The Family?
- May 12, 2009: Roadkillradio.com
- May 5, 2009: The economic down-turn and Canada
Blogroll
Help Lines for Men
Men's and Family Rights Organizations
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Archive for April 7, 2008
The book that the feminists don’t dare to debate
April 7, 2008 by Walter Schneider.
Dr. Albert Mohler’s blog features an entry today that is very favorable of Stephen Baskerville’s book “Taken into Custody”, a damning expose of the widespread corruption in the government-designed and -run divorce industry: a conglomerate of racketeering involving not only legislators, judges, prosecutors, social workers, police and bureaucrats but also a host of private-industry adjuncts to the government’s sector of the divorce industry, namely: child-support enforcement and similar agencies (in whom many politicians have a vested interest); psychologists; psychiatrists; mediators; lawyers; bar associations; law societies; universities; journalists; reporters and other interests in the media, and so on.
As Professor Stephen Baskerville describes in his book, all of those parties, especially those connected with the family-court system, conspire to intrude and insert themselves into families - even into the most intimate parts of family life - to expunge loving fathers from their families and their children’s lives, to apprehend and control children for the purpose of financially and emotionally devastating fathers (but not exclusively just fathers), to control women (for example, so as to dictate to women that they must choose between being married to the fathers of their children or to lose their children).
“Taken into Custody provides overwhelming evidence that a major reason for the existence and cancerous growth of what Dr. Albert Mohler calls the “Divorce Industrial Complex,” is the overwhelming greed and corruption that permeates the divorce industry.
“Taken into Custody” was popular from the time the first printing was released in the summer of 2007, but even now, quite a few months later, its popularity and appeal are still growing. Last night the reader reviews at amazon.com for “Taken into Custody” numbered 37. This morning their number had increased to 41, all of them favorable and five-star rated. The most remarkable thing about those reviews is that amongst them is not a single one written by a family- or father-hostile feminist. Just a few years ago that would have been unimaginable, while a dozen years ago Stephen Baskerville would have had a very serious problem with finding a publisher willing to produce and distribute his book.
The vast majority of the reader reviews originated in the USA, but quite a few are from reviewers in other countries, such as the U.K., Sweden, Australia and one with an origin identified as “International”.
There is apparently as of yet no review by a Canadian reader. I should have written one, but have not yet finished reading the book, having received it, finally, and after two inexplicably failed attempts, just a couple of days ago. I will make up for my missing review as soon as I am through reading “Taken into Custody.”
The fundamental issues discussed in “Taken into Custody” are not exclusive to the USA. They are endemic of all English-speaking nations (as Stephen Baskerville identified with numerous examples and citations pertaining to many of those nations). Still, they are applicable to - to mention a few such nations other than the USA - Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, the countries of the former Soviet block, India, Japan, Egypt, Spain, Italy, France, Holland, Germany, Canada, South Africa, and so on. The preceding list of countries is based on what is being reported to and discussed with me by fathers and by pro-father- and pro-family activists from around the world.
If you haven’t yet obtained a copy of “Taken into Custody”, get one, and you will find out that - if you dare to dream of having a family - civil rights and liberties are only an illusion. You will also find out that families make up the fabric of society, and that society is being destroyed when governments engage on a deliberate war that is designed to rip families apart.
As I am reading “Taking into Custody,” I cannot help but feel that the views I have held for years are confirmed. We managed in the ostensibly “free” West to install absolute totalitarianism by the government bureaucracy.
Posted in Shared Parenting, Men's Issues, Divorce, Media Bias, Child-Custody Awards, Family, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, Feminist Jurisprudence, Child Abduction | Print | 5 Comments »