- dads & things - http://blog.fathersforlife.org -
What’s wrong with having equality for women AND men?
Posted By Walter Schneider On October 26, 2007 @ 2:50 pm In Health, Censorship, Men and Women Work, Men's Issues, Feminist Jurisprudence, The New World Order, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, Women's Violence | No Comments
The article at the link identified below needs to be put into context.
Women’s group closes after losing its funding
Opposition MPs say Harper government `turning back clock’
Sep 21, 2007 04:30 AM
Les Whittington, Toronto Star
Ottawa BureauOTTAWA–Women’s rights advocates accused the Harper government of ignoring their struggle for equality after a leading women’s group closed its doors because of a lack of federal funding….([1] Full Story)</blockquote>
During more than 30 years of pushing for equality for women and cramming it down our throats, special interest groups like NAWL (the [Canadian] National Association of Women and the Law) achieved many rights and advantages for women that put men at a distinct disadvantage.
Arguably, in effect the elevation of “equal” rights for women, as opposed to corresponding men’s rights, turned men into second-class citizens and in some sectors in society, especially in jurisprudence, to decidedly being regarded as sub-human.
The list of inequities is too long to be shown here in full, but here are some of the points that immediately come to mind:
Child-custody is in nine out of ten cases awarded to women.
Child-support awards paid by men to women exceed those paid by women to men, at about up to 8.5 times the average of women at the same income levels.
Single custodial fathers average only about one dollar per month in child support for every $50 received by the average custodial mother.
There are twice as many women non-custodial parents evading child support payments than there are men who do so, and that is even though the number of non-custodial mothers is ten-times less than that of non-custodial fathers.
Biological mothers commit the vast majority of violence against children in families, while biological fathers commit about one-ninth of the violence against children in families that women do. Yet, groups like NAWL never ever mention violence against children by the children’s mothers, while those groups wage a veritable propaganda war against men as the perpetrators of all family violence, alleging that women who are violent always act in self-defence, even though women in cases of family violence comprise the vast majority of aggressors.
During the years of feminist domination and control, the media became so saturated with anti-male propaganda in ads, in commercial, in articles and in programs, that they easily rival and far exceed the impact of similar efforts by other totalitarian regimes to indoctrinate the masses.
Yet, whenever complaints are launched, they are invariably (with rare exceptions, e. g.: Michele Landsberg) being scoffed off by explaining that the slighting and outright slandering of men is being committed not out of ill will but in good humour.
A hate crime still remains a hate crime.
All of the claims made in the list of inequities are corroborated by credible sources (all of them accessible through [2] http://fathersforlife.org).
You are welcome to contribute links to credible sources of such information that you wish to include with your comments. F4L will ensure that appropriate links contained in your comments will work and are clickable after your comment has been posted.
Article printed from dads & things: http://blog.fathersforlife.org
URL to article: http://blog.fathersforlife.org/2007/10/26/whats-wrong-with-having-equality-for-women-and-men/
URLs in this post:
[1] Full Story: http://www.thestar.com/News/article/258956
[2] http://fathersforlife.org: http://fathersforlife.org
Click here to print.