Aaron Russo passed away

Unfortunately, Aaron Russo died on August 24, 2007 at age 64 of cancer of the bladder.

I independently found throughout the past few decades or so many of the same truths that Aaron Russo documented.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173 (close to two hours)

Let there be no mistake. Russo doesn’t stress that point very much (although he alludes to it), but what Russo presents is not an American problem, it is an international one. World government is being rammed down our throats.
The big banks are the driving force, they control the money supply, and there is not a single developed nation (and not a single developing one I heard of) that does not have a central bank.
Contrary to what by far most people believe, central banks are not controlled or owned by governments. They are owned and controlled by a handful of bankers who work very hard to install a global government.
Russo addresses that in his movie (towards the end) where he shows various quotes from a number of prominent people (e. g.: David Rockefeller) that show their desire to have a world government and to have it replace nations.
Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. Money is power, and there is no greater power than to have absolute control of all money.

I intend to order a few copies of the DVD. Singly they are US$10, and you can get 10 for a dollar each. That doesn’t seem right, but that is what it says.

I don’t know whether the quality of the DVDs is better than what is on google, but that doesn’t matter much.

I listened to Coast-to-Coast Radio earlier last night. That is how I found out about the DVD and the producer/director: Aaron Russo. Check his website:

http://www.freedomtofascism.com/

This is a link to a web page for Aaron Russo, set up by Coast-to-Coast Radio:

http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guests/1196.html

This is the interview I listened to:

Downloadable audio interview with George Noory on Coast to Coast AM: Part I, II, III (May 15, 2006 — I could not make the last of those preceding links work)

That interview provides a surprising and revealing truth about women’s lib. I have extensively written about that and its communist roots at Fathers for Life (for instance, see addendum).

–Walter

—Addendum—
From http://fathersforlife.org/feminism/truth_a_la_friedan.htm
Do Betty Friedan’s and NOW’s objectives differ from, say, Mao tse tung’s? This is what Mao had to say about the structure of society with respect to the family:

A man in China is usually subjected to the domination of three systems of authority [political authority, clan authority and religious authority]…. As for women, in addition to being dominated by these three systems of authority, they are also dominated by the men (the authority of the husband). These four authorities - political, clan, religious and masculine - are the embodiment of the whole feudal-patriarchal ideology and system, and are the four thick ropes binding the Chinese people, particularly the peasants. How the peasants have overthrown the political authority of the landlords in the countryside has been described above. The political authority of the landlords is the backbone of all the other systems of authority. With that overturned, the clan authority, the religious authority and the authority of the husband all begin to totter…. As to the authority of the husband, this has always been weaker among the poor peasants because, out of economic necessity, their womenfolk have to do more manual labour than the women of the richer classes and therefore have more say and greater power of decision in family matters. With the increasing bankruptcy of the rural economy in recent years, the basis for men’s domination over women has already been undermined. With the rise of the peasant movement, the women in many places have now begun to organize rural women’s associations; the opportunity has come for them to lift up their heads, and the authority of the husband is getting shakier every day. In a word, the whole feudal-patriarchal ideology and system is tottering with the growth of the peasants’ power.

“Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan”
(March 1927), Selected Works, Vol. I, pp. 44-46.
[The Little Red Book, Chapter 31. WOMEN, Full text
Look it up. It’s only a little more than one page.]

From Mao’s Little Red Book, this is Mao’s version of the truth that Rockefeller talks about in relation to women’s lib:

With the completion of agricultural cooperation, many co-operatives are finding themselves short of labour. It has become necessary to arouse the great mass of women who did not work in the fields before to take their place on the labour front…. China’s women are a vast reserve of labour power. This reserve should be tapped in the struggle to build a great socialist country.

Introductory note to “Solving the Labour Shortage by Arousing the Women to Join in Production” (1955), The Socialist Upsurge in China’s Countryside, Chinese ed., Vol. II.

One of the Rockefellers told Russo, after he had asked Russo about what he thought what women’s lib was all about and received the standard, politically-correct answer, “Aaron, you are an idiot. Women’s lib was brought about for no other reason than to bring women into the workforce, so that they could be taxed.” (Recalled from memory)

Mao, Lenin, Rockefeller… what is the difference? “…women are a vast reserve of labour power. This reserve should be tapped in the struggle to build a great socialist country [or global state, and so that they can be taxed, if you will].”

However, to get the full impression of how little anyone who promotes a totalitarian system differs from Rockefeller, you need to listen to that Russo reported that Rockefeller stated that to bring women into the workforce serves the State to gain control of the children.

–Walter

This entry was posted on September 1, 2007 at 7:32 am and is filed under The New World Order. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.

| Print