February 18, 2007 by Walter Schneider.

This is a video of a TV Ontario interview (The Agenda, with Steve Paikin) on YouTube (in 5 short parts).

The interview is definitely worth watching. The guests on the interview are Katherine Young (co-author, with Paul Nathanson, of “Spreading Misandry“), Walter Fox (criminal lawyer specializing in representing men in divorce and false-accusation cases; see his October 24, 2000 presentation to the Ontario Standing Committee on Justice and Social Policy), Ian Brown (host of TVO’s “The View from Here”, a typical “honorary woman” as defined by Katharine Young in the interview, although she was not pointing her finger at Ian Brown), and David Shackleton (new-age man, mytho-poetic and editor of Grip Magazine).

Especially during the first part of the interview, Ian Brown steadfastly held the opinion that men are more powerful than women and therefore the more dangerous perpetrators in domestic violence. None of his opponents (although Walter Fox identified the studies by Murray Strauss) brought up the fact that weapons such as poison, surprise attacks, knives, guns, lighters and lighter fluid, boiling water, etc. make for great equalizers and are readily wielded by women. During the subsequent parts of the show Ian Brown came across as someone who’s got his mind firmly made up and who can’t possibly be confused by any facts. It seems that as far as Ian Brown is concerned, there cannot possibly be any discrimination against men, especially no silence of the media relating to the subject of discrimination against men.

A poll that was run during the interview asked whether there is systematic discrimination against men in our society. The answers: 84% Yes, 16% No.

Personally, I strongly agree with Walter Fox’s and Katherine Young’s opinions, while I can’t quite agree with all of the views expressed by David Shackleton. David Shackleton, as he did for as for as long as I have known him, promotes the idea that men and women can be equal in all regards and are therefore freely interchangeable in all roles society has to offer for them.

David Shackleton, and to some extent the other participants in the discussion as well, appears to be somewhat unaware of how much discrimination there is against men and how that can, for the benefit of deniers like Ian Brown, be easily measured, especially with respect to the job market but also in relation to life in general. None of the participants mentioned anything about the fact that men comprise about 95 percent of serious or fatal job injuries. Nor did any of the participants mention the shorter average life expectancy of men (roughly 7 fewer years than that of women in Canada and even as many as 14 years in some of the nations of the former communist block).

Quite some years ago I had a discussion on that with David Shackleton. His answer then was that society treats men and women equally but in different ways. I guess he then saw the shorter life expectancy of men as the price men must pay for having more power. If anything, now he appears to come across as seeing men being responsible for being discriminated against, as it seems that according to David Shackleton the discrimination is brought upon men not by feminists but by men themselves because they are needlessly chivalrous and self-sacrificial.

Although the panelists agreed that more women than men (about 54 vs. 12-15) are being killed in Canada each year in interspousal violence (that is based on convictions; women are far less likely than men are suspected of, brought to trial or convicted of murdering their spouses), even though the vast majority of all murder victims is comprised of men, none of them touched on the fact that the largest sector of domestic violence victims is comprised of children, and that just about exactly 70 percent of serious or fatal injuries to children in families is being inflicted by the children’s biological mothers and their boyfriends or men-in-the-house who are not the biological fathers to the injured children, while biological fathers are about nine times less likely than mothers are to hurt their children.

None of the participants in the debate mentioned that straight-forward traditional marriage provides by far the safest environment and most protection against violence for all members in the traditional nuclear family.

Posted in Men's Issues, Feminism, Propaganda Exposed, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »

February 16, 2007 by Walter Schneider.

Today I came across three articles that comprise, in my mind, a continuous story of a progression from broken relationships to social chaos and criminality, caused by selfishness, lack of respect for fathers and by fatherlessness.

1. The Observer, 11 February 2007

   Is multi-dadding the future of parenting?

   By Lucy Cavendish
   Lucy Cavendish talks to the women who have built one big happy family out of several doomed relationships…(Full Story)

   ____________
   Note: The stories related in the article are of women who revel in the conditions of fatherlessness they created. However, who is to say that these “big happy” families are all that happy, happy enough to be the last each after a series of broken ones with expunged fathers? It seems to me that some will hold that these women are little more civilized than bitches in heat and have use for fathers only as sperm donors. Why would anyone call a social hodge-podge like that “one big happy family”?

2. BBC News, 15 February 2007

   Shock at women goading toddlers
   Footage of four women goading toddlers to fight has “stunned” police and social services in Devon…(Full Story)

   ___________
   And men got a bad rap for enjoying dog fights and cock fights? Is it more civilized to goad children to fight than it is to have animals do so?

   Civilization is the product of the evolution of the traditional nuclear family, the latter being comprised of two parents, one of each sex, married for life, with all of their children, all living under a common roof. Civilization is a thin veneer covering millions of years of savagery. Remove parents, even if only one half of them, fathers, and the result is anarchy.

   The next article’s got it right, but it is amazing how many of the comments shown after the article don’t get it.

3. Scandal of the absent fathers

   By TONY SEWELL, Chief Executive of the charity Generating Genius - More by this author »
   Daily Mail, 16th February 2007

   The gun and gang culture is spreading faster than any of us could have predicted. A third youth has been shot dead in South London within a fortnight…(Full Story)

Posted in Men's Issues, Family, Feminism, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »