January 27, 2007 by Walter Schneider.

Although I had sent a comment on Erin Pizzey’s article (How feminists tried to destroy the family, 22nd January 2007) to the Daily Mail a couple of days ago, the comment has not been posted yet at their website.

Perhaps what I wrote does not match required standards; perhaps there is feminist censorship at work that prevents information on the total and absolute feminist censorship of Erin Pizzey’s book, “Prone to Violence”, to be published at the Daily Mail’s website.

Here is what I had sent to the Daily Mail:

When Erin Pizzey’s book, “Prone to Violence”, had first been published, the feminists so thoroughly censored it that by 1996 only 13 copies of it remained in a few libraries in the whole English-speaking world (with the help of men’s rights activists, the book is now available on the Internet and in print).

That is the power of feminist censorship in action, censorship that is far more extensive and pervasive than censorship ever was in any other totalitarian regime; and all because feminists want us to believe that women cannot be and are not as violent as men are in spousal relationship.

There are now literally hundreds of studies that prove that Erin Pizzey was right all along, not only with respect to inter-spousal violence but also about there being an international agenda for the planned destruction of the family.

The number of comments published by the Daily Mail in connection with Erin Pizzey’s article reached 22 and remained unchanged since yesterday morning. All of the comments are positive.

Today I resubmitted my comment for a second try.

After having done so I was again informed of what the readers of the Daily Mail talk about. Here is what I learned:

Today our readers are talking about…

22 comments:	Revolt of the judges: the day they turned on John Reid
11 comments:	Drug addicts told ‘kick habit and win an iPod’
10 comments:	Honours row deepens as Downing St’s secret military-strength e-mail network is revealed
9 comments:	Labour moves to strip voters of rights over rubbish collection
9 comments:	No-pay day plea to NHS staff

It appears to be very odd that, with a total of 22 comments in relation to Erin Pizzey’s article published, no link to Erin Pizzey’s article is contained in that list.

Did any of you write to the Daily Mail and found that your comment too did not get published in connection with Erin Pizzey’s article? If so, send to me a copy of what it was you wrote. I will publish it at .

Link to Erin Pizzey’s article in the Daily Mail

Link to web pages for Erin Pizzey

–Walter
http://fathersforlife.org
http://blog.fathersforlife.org
——– Original Message ——–

Some men-rights activists, pro-family activists and others posted their comments on Erin Pizzey’s article in the Daily Mail.

As per today’s ranking at the Daily Mail.

Today our readers are talking about…

73 comments:	Blair caves in over adoption laws
55 comments:	The jilted bride who refused to miss out on her big day
53 comments:	‘Grammar schools should never have been closed’ minister admits
47 comments:	How two maths teachers clocked up 707 houses and £240m fortune
42 comments:	Prove you’re over 18, store tells pensioner trying to buy sherry

Erin Pizzey’s article deserves to be ranked with or ahead of those. Help to make that happen.

All of the 17 comments on Erin Pizzey’s article in the Daily Mail are positive! Add yours! Here is the link.

Forward this message to others, as widely as you can.

–Walter
http://fathersforlife.org

Posted in Censorship, Family, Feminism, Propaganda Exposed | Print | 1 Comment »

January 21, 2007 by Walter Schneider.

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: [Mention] New Book Coming: “Taken Into Custody”
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:13:57 -0500
From: Stephen Baskerville

Please forward this message to your lists.

I recently signed a contract with a current affairs publisher for a book tentatively entitled Taken Into Custody: The War Against Fathers, Marriage, and the Family. This will be a major exposé on all facets of the divorce/custody machine — including child custody, constitutional rights, child support, domestic violence, child abuse, feminism, government fatherhood/marriage programs, and more. It will document the politics behind the machinery — the conflicts of interest, the corruption, the money, the extremist ideology — and demonstrate why this is more than simple “gender bias” against fathers.

Taken Into Custody will be the most comprehensive and forthright exposé yet published by a major publishing house of the depredations of the divorce industry. I say this conscious that I am standing on the shoulders of others: Sanford Braver’s Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myths, Warren Farrell’s Father and Child Reunion (among his other books), Jeffery Leving’s Fathers Rights, Jed Abraham’s From Courtship to Courtroom, Robert Seidenberg’s The Fathers Emergency Guide to Divorce-Custody Battle, Richard Doyle’s Save the Males, Judy Parejko’s Stolen Vows, and others.

Without these pioneering efforts, I would never have been able to write this book. Yet these writers were either pressured by their publishers to tone down their language or forced to self-publish. This is the first book from a major publisher that has been permitted to speak the unvarnished truth about the divorce machinery: its destruction of families, its violations of the Constitution, its disregard for due process of law, its voracious appetite for children, parents, and families. This is no tirade however but a thoroughly documented study of the most repressive government machine ever created in the United States.

For examples of the kind of forthright account you can expect in this book, look at the published articles at www.stephenbaskerville.net.

Taken Into Custody is scheduled for publication in July for $24.95, but you can order it now for a special pre-publication price of $16.47 at Amazon.

I would be grateful if you would please place these links on your web sites and forward this message to everyone on your lists.

Stephen Baskerville

Stephen Baskerville, PhD
President
American Coalition for Fathers & Children
1718 M Street, NW, Suite 187
Washington, DC 20036
www.acfc.org
info@acfc.org
800-978-DADS (3237)

For more than 70 articles and studies in mainstream publications on the abuses of the divorce industry, see www.stephenbaskerville.net.

Posted in Shared Parenting, Child-Custody Awards, Men's Issues, Divorce, Education, Family, Feminist Jurisprudence, Child Abduction, The New World Order, Propaganda Exposed, Feminism, Paternity Fraud | Print | No Comments »

January 13, 2007 by Walter Schneider.

MonKayGRL wrote:

Dear fathers for life,
i was doing some research for a term paper that i have to do for a class, when i stumbled upon your website. i was excited to read an article that didn’t have the same things to say as all the rest, until i got to the “pink quotes” where it was mentioned that its our “own fault” if we believe those quotes. there was one quote saying “women mostly found work in textile mills…” and the caption under it said “why didn’t women do the honorable thing…” well that made my jaw drop open that someone could be so ignorant as to write that. women couldn’t do the “honorable” thing because of their lack of education. and whos fault was that? the mens, because unless a woman was very wealthy she couldn’t get an education, and even if she was wealthy she wasn’t allowed to study science or philosophy, so could you please explain to me how you expect a women to do the same if not greater things as a man when he has the tools handed to him and she can’t even touch them?
Sincerely,
D.M.

Hello D.M.,

First off, the article that irks you is not an article on feminism during the industrial revolution but treats the condition and status of men at that time, as indicated by its title, “The Industrial Revolution and the Plight of Men”.

You asked, “how you expect a women to do the same if not greater things as a man when he has the tools handed to him and she can’t even touch them?”

You must have been told something about the guild system when you referred to that bit about “the tools”. Whatever it was that you had been taught about that can only come from one source: feminist indoctrination, more specifically and narrowly, from “herstory”.

The vast majority of people then were simple labourers, not guild members, but even amongst the labourers women did not do heavy work and still almost exclusively don’t. Heavy, dirty and dangerous labour was and still is a male domain, partially because women never did and still don’t want to do it, partially because society did not and still does not want women to perform that sort of work.

Moreover, men and women in the labour forces were then generally equally uneducated (today still generally equally undereducated). Still, men then comprised (and still do) the vast majority (about 19 out of every 20) serious and fatal job accidents.

However, with you having been firmly indoctrinated (f.y.i., that is “brainwashed”) with “herstory”, no one should be surprised about the sort of reasoning you use for the questions you ask.

Have a closer look at The Industrial Revolution and the Plight of Men and read past the statement that got you riled up. Keep in mind that the article deals solely with the labouring classes.

As it is not possible to get to know enough and to become well informed when reading stories and articles that come from sources dominated and tainted by a single ideology, feminism, you should broaden your understanding and read more on issues pertaining to the Industrial Revolution:

Things Feminists Don’t Want to Know

Feminism For Male College Students: A Short Guide to the Truth

You implied that women were not educated as well as men were. To address that misperception, make sure to look at an article from “Short Guide to the Truth” that sheds more light on that concern of yours:

Did Women Really Want To Go Out To Work?

Consider also that during the industrial revolution schooling became compulsory, equally for girls and boys, and that any girl who wanted to get an education as good as any boy did faced few obstacles and a lot of encouragement. For instance, before the 1930s, a long time before the radical feminists came into view that ultimately usurped and controlled the education system and dumbed it down by saturating it with feminist propaganda, more women graduated from medical schools and similar institutions of higher learning than do today.

If you wish to remain ignorant about the truth, insist on limiting your knowledge and understanding by sticking to “herstory”.

Regards,

Walter Schneider

Posted in Propaganda Exposed | Print | No Comments »