Calendar
December 2006
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Categories
Latest Postings
Links
Archives
Meta
« Scottish Rules Dangerously Off-Kilter | A perception of the validity of the anorexia-nervosa pages at Fathers for Life »

Re: Duke Lacrosse Players: You won’t find this on the front pages of the major dailies

Townhall.com

The worst worsens
By Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, December 19, 2006

…After all this time, it finally came out in court last week that the DNA samples collected from the underwear and private parts of the alleged victim contained DNA from other men — but none from the Duke lacrosse players who were accused of raping her.

The head of the DNA testing laboratory testified in court under oath that both he and Nifong knew this and kept it secret.

You think that is incredible? How about a statement made afterwards by District Attorney Nifong that he didn’t say anything about this publicly because he was “trying to avoid dragging any names through the mud”?….

Full Story

It appears that the rape trial of the Duke Lacrosse Players will still go ahead in the spring of 2007. There is no information as to whether the woman who claimed to have been raped has been or will be indicted for making false rape allegations.

This entry was posted on December 19, 2006 at 6:25 am and is filed under Feminist Jurisprudence, Propaganda Exposed. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.

| Print

One Response to “Re: Duke Lacrosse Players: You won’t find this on the front pages of the major dailies”

  1. Walter Schneider says:
    May 18, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    Scoleman commented: http://www.petitiononline.com/usncpr/petition.html

    Dear Scoleman,

    Although I agree with almost all that your petition addresses, it needs to be pointed out that your effort to differentiate “good” from “bad” fathers separated from their families is a bit misguided, perhaps because you, too, have to an extent become indoctrinated by feminist anti-fathers propaganda.

    Your petition states: “I’m not referring to the “deadbeat dad” types who leave their ex-wives and children living in the streets.”

    With that statement you refer to the very small number of fathers who default on child support payments, for reasons other than being seriously ill, disabled, under- or unemployed, incarcerated and even being dead. Your sort of “deadbeat dad” type makes up no more than about three percent of all separated or divorced fathers (Sanford Braver, “Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myths : The Surprising Truth About Fathers, Children, and Divorce“).

    –Walter

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.