December 8, 2006 by Walter Schneider.

The way we handled school problems in the 70’s and the way we handle them today.

(This collection of education scenarios is circulating on the Internet. A friend sent it to me.)

Scenario: Jack pulls into school parking lot with rifle in gun rack.

1973 Vice Principal comes over, takes a look at Jack’s rifle, goes to his car and gets his to show Jack.

2006 School goes into lockdown, FBI called, Jack hauled off to jail and never sees his truck or gun again. Counselors called in for traumatized students and teachers.

_____________________

Scenario: Johnny and Mark get into a fist fight after school.

1973 Crowd gathers. Mark wins. Johnny and Mark shake hands and end up best friends. Nobody goes to jail, nobody arrested, nobody expelled.

2006 Police called, SWAT team arrives, arrests Johnny and Mark. Charge them with assault, both expelled even though Johnny started it.

_____________________

Scenario: Jeffrey won’t be still in class, disrupts other students.

1973 Jeffrey sent to office and given a good paddling by Principal. Sits still in class.

2006 Jeffrey given huge doses of Ritalin. Becomes a zombie. School gets extra money from state because Jeffrey has a disability.

_____________________

Scenario: Billy breaks a window in his father’s car and his Dad gives him a whipping.

1973 Billy is more careful next time, grows up normal, goes to college, and becomes a successful businessman.

2006 Billy’s Dad is arrested for child abuse. Billy removed to foster care and joins a gang. Billy’s sister is told by state psychologist that she remembers being abused herself and their Dad goes to prison. Billy’s mom has affair with psychologist.

_____________________

Scenario: Mark gets a headache and takes some headache medicine to school.

1973 Mark shares headache medicine with Principal out on the smoking dock.

2006 Police called, Mark expelled from school for drug violations. Car searched for drugs and weapons.

_____________________

Scenario: Mary turns up pregnant.

1973 5 High School Boys leave town. Mary does her senior year at a special school for expectant mothers.

2006 Middle School Counselor calls Planned Parenthood, who notifies the ACLU. Mary is driven to the next state over and gets an abortion without her parent’s consent or knowledge. Mary given condoms and told to be more careful next time.

_____________________

Scenario: Pedro fails high school English.

1973: Pedro goes to summer school, passes English, goes to college.

2006: Pedro’s cause is taken up by state democratic party. Newspaper articles appear nationally explaining that teaching English as a requirement for graduation is racist. ACLU files class action lawsuit against state school system and Pedro’s English teacher. English banned from core curriculum. Pedro given diploma anyway but ends up mowing lawns for a living because he can’t speak English.

_____________________

Scenario: Johnny takes apart leftover firecrackers from the 4th of July,puts them in a model airplane paint bottle, blows up a red ant bed.

1973 Ants die.

2006 BATF, Homeland Security, FBI called. Johnny charged with domestic terrorism, FBI investigates parents, siblings removed from home, computers confiscated, Johnny’s Dad goes on a terror watch list and is never allowed to fly again.

_____________________

Scenario: Johnny falls while running during recess and scrapes his knee. He is found crying by his teacher, Mary. Mary, hugs him to comfort him.

1973 - In a short time Johnny feels better and goes on playing.

2006 - Mary is accused of being a sexual predator and loses her job. She faces 3 years in State Prison.

___________________________________________________
More on the state of the education system and on what you can do about it

Posted in Abortion, Education, The New World Order | Print | No Comments »

December 8, 2006 by Walter Schneider.

This comment is not politically correct, but it is not intended to run down the efforts of Barbara Kay to restore the truth in reporting regarding feminist propaganda.

It is a good thing to have someone like Barbara Kay from the National Post write about how Marc Lepine’s murder of 14 women at the Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal in Canada’s (he killed himself as well) is being used to promote feminist propaganda against men and especially against Canadian men.

The title of her article is, “Lone gunman: The Ecole Polytechnique massacre was a freak tragedy. So why is every man made to feel guilty for it?” (Full Story)

Although her article is right-on about the consequences of that long-running feminist propaganda effort, her commentary falls a little short of being perfect. It does not completely explain “why every man is being made to feel guilty for it,” although it makes it clear that the goal of that propaganda effort is being met. The evidence is clear. For days now, whenever we watch news coverage of proceedings on Parliament Hill, we see the spectacle of grown, well-educated and well-informed politicians (including Stephen Harper and other members of his party) sporting white ribbons on their lapels, apparently advertising their atonement for the collective guilt of all Canadian men for the sins of one murderous, deranged gunman.

Aside from that, Barbara Kay’s commentary contains other serious factual errors.

To begin with, right at the start of her commentary, she asserts that Marc Lepin’s mass-murder was the worst in Canadian history. That claim is wrong, partially a result, too, of feminist propaganda. Too bad that Barbara Kay fell for it and helps to propagate that claim.

The worst recorded mass-murders in Canada’s history involved women as perpetrators, the women guilty of causing the deaths of 400 to 600 small children, the case of The Butterbox Children in Nova Scotia, from the late 1920’s through at least the late 1940’s.

There was another case that, even though it received much notoriety in the media at the time and actually involved more victims than the Montreal Massacre, is not ever being mentioned by feminist propagandists.

Joseph-Alberta Guay …devised a plan to get rid of his wife. With the help of Genereux Ruest, an employee with a talent for mechanical work, he designed and constructed a timed bomb.On 9 September 1949, he convinced Rita (his wife) to fly to Baie-Comeau to pick up some items for the store and, at the airport, took out an additional insurance policy on his wife in the amount of $10,000. Before the Canadian Pacific Airlines DC-3 left the ground, Ruest’s sister, Marguerite Pitre, air-freighted a package containing the bomb and it was placed in the forward baggage compartment.

The bomb exploded 41 miles into the trip, killing all 23 people on board.

Pitre confessed ten days after the explosion while in the hospital recovering from a suicide attempt. Guay, Ruest, and Pitre were arrested and eventually hanged for their crimes. At the time, it was the worst mass murder in North America.
http://www.famouscanadians.net/name/g/guayalbert.php

It is never a good thing to accept at face value anything feminists claim. Feminists lie or accept as the truth the lies of other feminists, and soon, with the help of unsuspecting journalists, those feminist lies take on a life of their own.

Barbara Kay’s assertion regarding “Canada’s worst mass murder” is not the only inaccuracy in her commentary. She also mentioned that “Women have been subjugated by men throughout history.” True, but that is only a partial truth. Feminists are addicted to telling partial truths, but objective journalists should never accept partial truths at face value, especially not the sort of “truths” contained in feminist propaganda (a.k.a. femprop).

Throughout history men did the dirty work for home and country. They died early deaths in horribly massive numbers on account of it, but although at times men were honoured for doing so (not vilified for it as modern feminists are prone to do), it is an accomplished fact that women always were treasured and even put on pedestals for being women. Men were the ones who were being subjugated ever more intensively, ever since and since before the Victorian Age.

All journalists partaking of a regular diet of femprop would do well to take a little antidote now and then. I cannot think of anything better to dispel the effects of femprop than to read two essays by Belfort Bax (he was a lawyer, a prominent socialist and a contemporary and acquaintance of Karl Marx and George Bernard Shaw), namely: 1.) The Fraud of Feminism (1913) and 2.) The Legal Subjection of Men (1908).

Those two essays are perfect eye-openers for anyone blinded or blinkered by femprop.

–Walter

______________________
By the way, real men don’t wear white ribbons. For more on that, do this search through google.com.

Posted in Feminism, Propaganda Exposed, Women's Violence | Print | No Comments »