Australian safety survey kills feminist distortions

This blog entry is almost seven years old, but I just updated it, and made it a sticky [for a few days], because the circumstances of the update need to be understood and seen by as many people as possible.

The reason why I updated the article is that the Australian Government has conducted a great purge of statistical information relating to issues affecting primarily Australian men. The article now contains evidence that official Australian figures once existed (in August of 2006) that showed information about the distribution of victims of violence.

I appended the full text of the article because it is proof that the data existed.  The indicated article is on the level, because I had seen at the time that it was collaborated by the information released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The reason for showing all of the contents of the article here (appended) is that the Australian government took it upon itself to remove the source data for the article from public view.

If you are Australian and have not yet known that this is happening, you are being lied to, the truth is being kept from from you, and what will you do about it?

Original blog entry (with annotations I made yesterday):

Kitten News Magazine, August 2006

By Max Ponti

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Personal Safety Survey has finally emerged and along with its appearance, the statistical myths of feminist’s victimhood and women’s class oppression – particularly those relating to claims of epidemic violence against women – have immediately vaporised.

Their silence is deafening. (Full Story — archived copy of the original article)

See also: [ABS] 4906.0 – Personal Safety, Australia (Re-issue), 2005; Latest ISSUE (2013 04 13: Sorry, but the ABS has made that web page inaccessible) Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 11/08/2006, and more detailed comments (2013 04 13: Sorry, because the information backing up those details is no longer available on the Net, that link too was removed.)
___________________
Note (2013 04 13): To make sure that the data that are available from the ABS release will not run the risk of falling prey to feminist censorship and vanish completely, I took the liberty of showing all of the contents of the Kitten News article (that website appears to have been taken down) right here, to make sure anyone can see what the Australian Bureau of Statistics had removed from public view:

Appended article (full text):

Australian safety survey kills feminist distortions
Max Ponti

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Personal Safety Survey has finally emerged and along with its appearance, the statistical myths of feminist’s victimhood and women’s class oppression – particularly those relating to claims of epidemic violence against women – have immediately vaporised.

Their silence is deafening.

The survey reveals a picture of what any rational person should have assumed about life simply by observation of the world around them and their day to day existence in it. The survey reveals what most people should have known or should have suspected about the facts of social violence – it is men rather than women who have the most to fear regarding their personal safety. It further reveals that the perpetrators of violence, in all their ugly forms and diversity, are not just men, and that the domain of perpetrators includes a significant percentage of women.

There are few surprises in this survey other than it seems to have been conducted with appropriate propriety. A refreshing breath of fresh air given the lies and spin of so many preceding studies and surveys conducted on this subject.

But before delving into some its facts and figures, there are a couple of points that should be clarified about the survey itself.

As surveys go, it seems to have been done responsibly. It has encompassed a sizeable sample of the population – 16,300 adults in total, about 0.1% of the Australian adult population – so its findings could be seen to be a reasonable reflection of what’s really going on in Australia today. That’s excellent. However, for some peculiar reason, over twice as many women were surveyed than men – 11,800 women compared to only 4,500 men.

Why?

Aren’t men’s experiences of personal safety as valid as those of women? Did they expect that women’s experiences of violence would be more valid, diverse or significant? Or was it simply a matter of funding as is implied in the survey’s notes? Whatever the reason for it, and there is no fair or justifiable stance that could possibly be taken for this glaring discrepancy, the question remains, why were men relegated to being less than second class respondents?

Who will provide an answer?

No one, you can bet, and you can go figure it for yourself, but perhaps we can hope this imbalance will be addressed in any further surveys where the sex of the respondents is relevant.

For now though, when digesting the results, it must be realised that the men’s data should be seen to be less accurate than that of the women. In fact, in some cases, reflected in the ABS tables, the data for men is so shabby that annotations have been made indicating that the data are of dubious reliability. Given the importance and far reaching social implications of this survey, this exclusion of men’s experiences is a travesty of their rights as taxpayers and citizens of the nation. Especially as it turns out that men are singly the most severely effected members of society where personal safety and violence are concerned.

This treatment of men is a clear statement by the John Howard Liberal government that they see Australian men as being second rate and less than half as important as the women of the nation. Yet, in the Liberal’s defense, it must be argued that they are the first government in Australia to include men in such a survey – previous Labor governments simply didn’t care about the safety of men and only ever conducted safety surveys for women. That development in itself is at least some consolation for Australian men and is a positive step forward.

The other glaring concern about the production of this ABS survey was the sexist exclusion of men as interviewers. 100% of the interviews were conducted by women. The survey does point out that male interviewers were available upon request for those respondents who may have been so inclined, however, it reports that all those interviewed accommodated the default female interviewers. It is therefore important to realise that the 100% use of female interviewers could possibly have led to an underreporting of spousal and partner violence of men by females due to personal embarrassment in front of women interviewers.

Despite these sexist anomalies however – in a national survey of this significance, one could have at least expected squeaky-clean adherence to equal-sex political correctness – the survey reveals for the first time much important information about personal safety and the victims and perpetrators of personal violence. A subject, which has long been obscured by the murky fog of feminist advocacy.

This survey has revealed some very important truths about social violence and has exposed feminist lies. The following statements, derived directly from the ABS survey, are just our initial findings and a fuller investigation by readers of the finer detail is encouraged. Unfortunately, the ABS has presented its findings in a way that may not be readily interpreted by men’s rights advocates in the form they are used to seeing them, therefore we have represented them, expressed in a way with which our readers will be more familiar.

Our statements below compare the freshly published data to the often colloquially quoted rhetorical statistics of feminist propaganda and remember this, these are official Australian government research figures and not some trumped up biased university faculty’s data or those of some politically biased independent non government organisation.

Facts – the ABS survey has revealed that –

  • Men are more than twice as likely as women to be the victims of violence and are being physically or sexually assaulted or threatened at the rate of up to 2 incidents per second
  • Women are not the victims of family (domestic) violence as often as the quoted 1 in 4, nor even 1 in 8, nor even 1 in 10, but actually 1 in 100
  • Women are not being raped every 26 seconds, nor even every 90 seconds, as feminists frequently claim, but are in fact experiencing sexual assault – not necessarily rape – including both reported and all unreported incidents, at a rate of less than 1 per 5 minutes. This is a rate 91% less than that which feminists have previously claimed
  • The ratio of female to male family (domestic) violence victims in a home is not 99:1, nor 9:1, nor even 5:1, but is actually closer to 2:1

These statements above are all calculated from the ABS survey data without corruption. They are the figures.

Of course there will be some deviation from the survey compared to real life figures, just as in all studies (read the fine print of the survey) but, remember, the data for women is more than twice as likely to be accurate as it is for men and the data for men may have been tainted by the use of default female interviewers, some of whom may even have been staunch feminists, possibly resulting in underreporting of men’s experience of family violence as victims.

Some other interesting statistics –

 

During the previous 12 months in Australia

Nature of violence
Men Women
Physical assault 485,400
6.5%
1 in 15
55 per hour
242,000
3.1%
1 in 32
28 per hour
Physical assault threatened/attempted 392,000
5.3%
1 in 19
162,400
2.1%
1 in 48
Sexual assault 42,300
0.6%
1 in 167
4.8 per hour
101,600
1.3%
1 in 77
11.6 per hour
Sexual assault
threatened/attempted
5,700
0.1%
1 in 1,000
34,900
0.5%
1 in 200
Physical assault in a home by opposite sex 60,900
0.8%
1 in 125
125,100
1.6%
1 in 61
Physical assault by current or previous partner – sex not indicated 21,200
0.3%
1 in 333
2.4 per hour
74,000
1.0%
1 in 104
8.5 per hour

 

Some notes relating to the above table –

1. The numbers of men and women in each cell are ABS published extrapolations of their survey sample of men and women, which was approximately 0.1% of the adult population of Australia.

2. The percentage figure in each cell is the ABS published percentage of the total male or female population of adult Australians affected by that particular issue.

3. The ratio statistics are ABS published extrapolations of their survey sample and represent the percentages of the total adult population of either men or women respectively.

4. The rates of violence perpetration (expressed as n per hour) are our calculations based solely upon the ABS data simply divided by 8,760, the number of hours in a 12 month period – the period of reference used for the ABS survey.

So, in conclusion, what does all this mean?

It means that Australia as a nation is the first in the Western world to undertake a survey of adult personal safety and violence based on the sex of the community. It has both massive and broad implications for social scrutiny and the politics of sex and violence. It stands as a precedent for further world development and application.

It also has immediate application to other Western societies. Australia, being a contemporary Western nation has been subjected, more or less, to the same political influences over the last half century that have been experienced by the USA, UK, Canada, New Zealand and arguably most other European nations. The data recorded would be directly applicable to other Western societies, more or less and may be quoted as a being from a highly reputable source.

The results of this survey should be seen as the first authoritative sample of non-advocacy research on the issues of Western social violence and in particular, inter-sexual personal violence. Especially in light of the fact that no non-advocacy bipartisan surveys of this subject have ever been conducted by any Western nation before.

The results are both revealing and deeply informative. Revealing about the incorrectness of previously published feminist advocacy research – and subsequent government information too – and informative about the dire state of violence perpetrated against men in modern civilised Western societies.

The data also provide the basis for a requirement for Western governments to become focused on the safety standards of its men as a top priority and to begin to recognise that there are serious deficiencies in its treatment of men in society.

The survey also amplifies the ludicrous state of Western government’s pursuit of highly expensive anti-violence campaigns and legislation for the least affected victims of personal violence – women – whilst a much more serious problem of violence exists and is being waged against its men. It also establishes facts that require governments and anti-male NGOs in Australia to immediately rewrite their literature and websites which state false and misleading statistics about personal violence, in particular, men as overwhelmingly family violence perpetrators.

It should also lead to an immediate nation-wide reassessment of family relationship management and Family Law values.

It’s no wonder that feminists, the government and the mainstream media in Australia have been so quiet about the release of this new survey. It exposes a huge raft of feminist baloney, lies and deceptions.

 

Max Ponti

This entry was posted in Censorship, Corruption, False Allegations, Family Violence, Feminism, Men's Issues, Propaganda Exposed, Social-Destruction Enterprise, Women's Violence. Bookmark the permalink.